---
title: "Q-Cells vs Runergy New Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Q-Cells vs Runergy New Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-runergy-new-energy"
---

# Q-Cells vs Runergy New Energy

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 0 models). Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Q-Cells | Runergy New Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Headquarters | Seoul | Yancheng |
| Founded | 1999 | 2013 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 15,000+ |
| Annual capacity | 11.2 GW/year | 63+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NASDAQ: HQCL |  |
| Website | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Runergy is an international PV technology company specializing in the research, development, manufacturing, and distribution of PV solar cells and modules. By the end of 2023, the company had shipped over 65 GW of solar cells. Runergy operates production facilities in China and overseas for polysilicon, wafers, cells...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Q-Cells | Runergy New Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 89 | 0 | +89 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 0 W | +675 W |
| Avg Power | 468 W | 0 W | +468 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Q-Cells | Runergy New Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.21% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Q-Cells | Runergy New Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.325%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (39%) | 0 (0%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Q-Cells | Runergy New Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (7.9%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 29 (32.6%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 30 (33.7%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 21 (23.6%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 2 (2.2%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | Q-Cells | Runergy New Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 41 (46.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 11 (12.4%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 17 (19.1%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Q-Cells | Runergy New Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 38 (42.7%) | 0 |
| N-type | 23 (25.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 8 (9.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Q-Cells, now operating as Hanwha Q CELLS under South Korean conglomerate Hanwha Group, traces its roots to a German solar pioneer acquired by Hanwha in 2012. The combined entity maintains a well-established presence on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 PV module maker list and operates what it describes as the largest solar module manufacturing capacity in the Western Hemisphere, with US facilities in Dalton and Cartersville, Georgia collectively targeting more than 8 GW of annual module output. Runergy New Energy - formally Jiangsu Runergy New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. - was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in Yancheng City, Jiangsu, China. It achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in 2023 and has maintained it for at least six consecutive quarters through Q1 2025, with combined cell production capacity across sites in China, Thailand, and a newer module facility in Huntsville, Alabama reportedly exceeding 63 GW. On institutional footprint and brand recognition - particularly in the US and European markets - Q-Cells holds a clear advantage built over more than a decade.

Q-Cells is best known for premium residential and commercial rooftop panels, with its Q.PEAK DUO line built on PERC technology and the company actively expanding into TOPCon and perovskite-silicon tandem research. It earned third place in SolarReviews' 2025 manufacturer rankings and is frequently cited for strong temperature coefficients and long warranty terms. Runergy's primary module brand is Hyperion, which targets residential, commercial, and off-grid applications using N-type TOPCon and bifacial designs. Runergy's N-type modules ranked first for energy yield among bifacial modules in a PV Magazine performance test, and the company also supplies cells to major third-party brands, signaling a strong upstream cell-manufacturing pedigree.

For a typical residential or commercial buyer in 2025 prioritizing supply-chain transparency and long-term installer support, Q-Cells is the safer default - its US manufacturing base and deep market penetration translate into more installer familiarity and easier warranty servicing. Runergy is a credible alternative, particularly for buyers focused on high-efficiency N-type bifacial output at a competitive price point, but its brand recognition among installers remains more limited outside specialist channels.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels for 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://solarbytes.info/business-bytes/runergy-bnef-tier1-q1-2025-solar-module-expansion-8764407 \| Runergy secures BNEF Tier 1 PV Maker status for sixth quarter \| article

\- https://www.runergy.com/runergys-n-type-modules-achieve-top-ranking-in-pv-magazines-latest-performance-test/ \| Runergy N-Type Modules Achieve Top Ranking in PV Magazine Test \| article

\- https://us.qcells.com/blog/qcells-invests-2-5-billion-in-building-complete-solar-supply-chain-in-u-s/ \| Qcells Invests $2.5 Billion in U.S. Solar Supply Chain \| article

\- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtT1QqPnHLA \| Inside Runergy: A Global Leader in High-Efficiency Solar Cell Technology \| video

Sources:

\- \[Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels for 2025 - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Runergy secures BNEF Tier 1 PV Maker status for sixth quarter\](https://solarbytes.info/business-bytes/runergy-bnef-tier1-q1-2025-solar-module-expansion-8764407)

\- \[Runergy N-Type Modules Achieve Top Ranking in PV Magazine Test\](https://www.runergy.com/runergys-n-type-modules-achieve-top-ranking-in-pv-magazines-latest-performance-test/)

\- \[Qcells Invests $2.5 Billion in U.S. Solar Supply Chain\](https://us.qcells.com/blog/qcells-invests-2-5-billion-in-building-complete-solar-supply-chain-in-u-s/)

\- \[Inside Runergy: A Global Leader in High-Efficiency Solar Cell Technology (YouTube)\](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtT1QqPnHLA)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Q-Cells vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Runergy New Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy-new-energy)
- [Q-Cells vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Runergy New Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runergy-new-energy)
- [Q-Cells vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Runergy New Energy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-runergy-new-energy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-runergy-new-energy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.