---
title: "Q-Cells vs Risen - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Q-Cells vs Risen solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-risen"
---

# Q-Cells vs Risen

Risen has the broader catalog (153 vs 89 models). Risen leads on peak efficiency at 24.00%. Risen leans bifacial (82% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Q-Cells | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Headquarters | Seoul | Ninghai |
| Founded | 1999 | 1986 |
| Employees | 2000+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 11.2 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NASDAQ: HQCL | SZSE: 300118 |
| Website | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) | [https://www.risenenergy.com](https://www.risenenergy.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Q-Cells | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 89 | 153 | +64 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 745 W | +70 W |
| Avg Power | 468 W | 547 W | +79 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Q-Cells | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | 24.00% | +0.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.21% | 21.82% | +0.61 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Q-Cells | Risen | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.325%/°C | -0.291%/°C | +0.034 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (39%) | 125 (82%) | +42 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +2.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Risen skews to higher efficiency: 10% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Q-Cells | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (7.9%) | 4 (2.6%) |
| 20-21% | 29 (32.6%) | 24 (15.7%) |
| 21-22% | 30 (33.7%) | 52 (34.0%) |
| 22-23% | 21 (23.6%) | 57 (37.3%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (2.2%) | 16 (10.5%) |


## Power distribution

Risen offers more 600W+ panels (39% of lineup)


| Power band | Q-Cells | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 20 (22.5%) | 13 (8.5%) |
| 400-499W | 41 (46.1%) | 46 (30.1%) |
| 500-599W | 11 (12.4%) | 34 (22.2%) |
| 600-699W | 17 (19.1%) | 42 (27.5%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 18 (11.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (39%)


| Technology | Q-Cells | Risen |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 38 (42.7%) | 45 (29.4%) |
| N-type | 23 (25.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 8 (9.0%) | 60 (39.2%) |
| HJT | 0 | 48 (31.4%) |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Risen


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RSM132-8-745BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-745bhdg) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RSM132-8-740BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-740bhdg) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RSM132-8-735BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-735bhdg) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RSM132-8-730BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-730bhdg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RSM132-8-725BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-725bhdg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RSM132-8-720BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-720bhdg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RSM132-8-715BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-715bhdg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (715W)](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RSM132-8-710BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-710bhdg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Q-Cells - operating as Hanwha Q CELLS - traces its roots to a German startup founded in 1999 before South Korean conglomerate Hanwha acquired it in 2012, giving it a hybrid European-Asian heritage that sets it apart from most Chinese-majority rivals. The company holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability status and has built the largest silicon module manufacturing facility in the Western Hemisphere at its Dalton, Georgia plant, running at approximately 8.4 GW of annual U.S. capacity alone. Risen Energy, headquartered in Shengzhou, China, is a long-established Chinese manufacturer that has grown into a top-5 global module shipper by volume and likewise carries Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 recognition; independent reviews cite total annual production capacity in the range of tens of gigawatts across its China facilities. In terms of institutional footprint - particularly across U.S. and European markets where supply-chain provenance carries increasing policy weight - Q-Cells holds a meaningful advantage.

Both manufacturers span residential, commercial, and utility-scale segments, but their technology trajectories differ. Q-Cells built its reputation on the Q.ANTUM and Q.ANTUM DUO cell platform, a PERC-based architecture prized for low degradation rates and competitive temperature coefficients, and is actively developing TOPCon and perovskite-silicon tandem lines for future commercialization. Risen has made a more aggressive near-term bet on heterojunction (HJT) technology through its Hyper-ion product family, achieving an average 740 W output in mass production with a certified cell efficiency of 26.61% as reported in mid-2025. Cumulative Hyper-ion shipments have reportedly surpassed 12 GW across more than 80 countries. Risen also continues to offer PERC and TOPCon variants, positioning it as a broad-spectrum supplier for utility developers seeking high-output formats as well as cost-conscious residential buyers.

For a typical 2025 buyer, Q-Cells is the stronger default for residential rooftops in markets where domestic manufacturing, warranty track record, and installer familiarity matter - especially in the United States. Risen is a competitive alternative at utility scale or where leading-edge HJT module performance is a priority, though buyers outside Asia should confirm local service coverage before committing to a large deployment.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Q CELLS Solar Panels - Complete Review \| EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review of Hanwha Q CELLS Solar Panels 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://solartechonline.com/blog/risen-solar-panels-review-2025/ \| Risen Solar Panels Review 2025 - Independent Testing and Analysis \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/07/02/risen-energy-achieves-740-w-average-output-for-mass-produced-heterojunction-solar-module/ \| Risen Energy hits 740 W average for mass-produced HJT module - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://taiyangnews.info/technology/qcells-to-invest-big-in-tandem-solar \| Q Cells to Invest Big in Tandem Solar - TaiyangNews \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Q-Cells vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-risen)
- [Q-Cells vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-risen)
- [Q-Cells vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Risen](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-risen)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-risen

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.