---
title: "Pylontech vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Pylontech vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/pylontech-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Pylontech vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Pylontech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2009 | 1997 |
| Employees | 2,114 |  |
| Annual capacity | 7-8.5 (in 2022) GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SSE (Shanghai Stock Exchange): 688063 |  |
| Website | [https://www.pylontech.com.cn](https://www.pylontech.com.cn) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Pylontech is a leading battery energy storage system (BESS) provider, specializing in lithium iron phosphate technology. They offer solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications, integrating expertise in electrochemistry, power electronics, and system integration. The company is dedicated to...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Pylontech | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Pylontech | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Pylontech | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Pylontech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Pylontech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Pylontech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Pylontech (Pylon Technologies Co., Ltd.) is a Chinese energy storage manufacturer founded in Shanghai in 2009, specializing exclusively in lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery systems - it does not manufacture solar panels. Listed on a Chinese stock exchange in 2020, the company has delivered storage systems to more than 90 countries and surpassed 2 million deployed installations globally. In 2026, Pylontech earned BloombergNEF Tier 1 Energy Storage Manufacturer recognition, a credential that reflects bankability and project execution track record in the storage segment. Trina Solar (Trinasolar), founded in 1997 in Changzhou, China, is one of the world's largest PV module producers, holding BloombergNEF Tier 1 status on the module side with a reported 100% bankability rating for eight consecutive years and PVEL Top Performer status for eleven consecutive years. With annual manufacturing capacity exceeding 80 GW and cumulative global shipments surpassing 292 GW as of mid-2025, Trina Solar carries a substantially stronger institutional footprint in the solar module market.

Because Pylontech does not produce solar panels, it occupies a complementary role in solar energy projects as a storage layer provider. Its residential US series batteries, mid-scale C&I rack systems, and utility-grade solutions all use LFP chemistry and are routinely paired with modules from third-party manufacturers. Pylontech is vertically integrated across the storage stack, producing its own battery cells, battery management systems, and energy management systems in-house. Trina Solar, by contrast, addresses every generation segment: the compact Vertex S and Vertex S+ families target residential rooftops and commercial buildings, while the Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra line - with outputs above 740 W and efficiencies up to 24.5% as reported by pv-magazine - serves utility-scale ground-mount projects. N-type TOPCon is the dominant cell technology across Trina's current portfolio, offering better low-light performance and lower temperature coefficients than the PERC technology it is displacing.

A head-to-head comparison between Pylontech and Trina Solar is not straightforward because the two brands do not compete in the same product category - one makes batteries, the other makes modules. For a typical international buyer, Trina Solar is the natural starting point for panel selection given its documented quality, breadth of product range, and strong module-tier bankability credentials. Pylontech enters the picture at the storage layer and can be paired with Trina modules or virtually any other brand. Procurement teams and installers are best served by treating these brands as complementary components of one system rather than competing alternatives.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Pylontech vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/pylontech-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Pylontech vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/pylontech-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Pylontech vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/pylontech-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/pylontech-vs-trina-solar