---
title: "PVolution vs Shinson Technology - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare PVolution vs Shinson Technology solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/pvolution-vs-shinson-technology"
---

# PVolution vs Shinson Technology

Shinson Technology has the broader catalog (105 vs 60 models). PVolution leads on peak efficiency at 24.30%. PVolution leans bifacial (92% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | PVolution | Shinson Technology |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | China |
| Headquarters | Grünwald | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 2010 |
| Employees | 2-10 | 500+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 10+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://pvolution.de](https://pvolution.de) | [http://shinsontech.com](http://shinsontech.com) |

PVolution GmbH is a small German company specializing in the manufacturing of high-quality photovoltaic modules with customized solutions for individual customer needs. Based in Grünwald near Munich, the company focuses on efficiency, durability, and sustainability, using certified materials and components. It...

Shinson Technology is a leading professional supplier in the renewable energy industry, specializing in the production and distribution of high-quality PV modules, completed PV kits, and energy storage solutions. With a commitment to sustainable energy solutions, they strive to provide innovative and reliable products...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | PVolution | Shinson Technology | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 60 | 105 | +45 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 720 W |  |
| Avg Power | 506 W | 477 W | +29 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | PVolution | Shinson Technology | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.30% | 23.23% | +1.07 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.62% | 20.54% | +1.08 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | PVolution | Shinson Technology | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.285%/°C | -0.314%/°C | +0.029 |
| Bifacial Share | 55 (92%) | 65 (62%) | +30 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.6 yrs | 27.7 yrs | +1.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

PVolution skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | PVolution | Shinson Technology |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 11 (18.3%) | 24 (22.9%) |
| 21-22% | 2 (3.3%) | 31 (29.5%) |
| 22-23% | 27 (45.0%) | 28 (26.7%) |
| 23%+ | 20 (33.3%) | 5 (4.8%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 17 (16.2%) |


## Power distribution

PVolution offers more 600W+ panels (27% of lineup)


| Power band | PVolution | Shinson Technology |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 11 (18.3%) | 25 (23.8%) |
| 400-499W | 26 (43.3%) | 45 (42.9%) |
| 500-599W | 7 (11.7%) | 16 (15.2%) |
| 600-699W | 8 (13.3%) | 13 (12.4%) |
| 700W+ | 8 (13.3%) | 6 (5.7%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (60%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (40%)


| Technology | PVolution | Shinson Technology |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 36 (60.0%) | 42 (40.0%) |
| HJT | 15 (25.0%) | 15 (14.3%) |
| Back Contact | 9 (15.0%) | 0 |
| PERC | 0 | 35 (33.3%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 5 (4.8%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 4 (3.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 4 (3.8%) |


## Top panels, PVolution


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PVN720-M12TCBB](https://comparepv.com/panel/pvolution-pvn720-m12tcbb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [PVN715-M12TCBB](https://comparepv.com/panel/pvolution-pvn715-m12tcbb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PVN710-M12TCBB (CORE)](https://comparepv.com/panel/pvolution-pvn710-m12tcbb-core) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PVN710-M12TCBB (TRION)](https://comparepv.com/panel/pvolution-pvn710-m12tcbb-trion) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [PVN705-M12TCBB (CORE)](https://comparepv.com/panel/pvolution-pvn705-m12tcbb-core) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PVN705-M12TCBB (TRION)](https://comparepv.com/panel/pvolution-pvn705-m12tcbb-trion) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PVN700-M12TCBB (CORE)](https://comparepv.com/panel/pvolution-pvn700-m12tcbb-core) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PVN700-M12TCBB (TRION)](https://comparepv.com/panel/pvolution-pvn700-m12tcbb-trion) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [PVN695-M12TCBB](https://comparepv.com/panel/pvolution-pvn695-m12tcbb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PVN690-M12TCBB](https://comparepv.com/panel/pvolution-pvn690-m12tcbb) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Shinson Technology


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [S720M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s720m66ht4bf) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [S715M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s715m66ht4bf) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [S710M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s710m66ht4bf) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [S705M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s705m66ht4bf) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [S700M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s700m66nt4bf) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [S700M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s700m66ht4bf) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [S695M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s695m66nt4bf) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [S690M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s690m66nt4bf) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [S685M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s685m66nt4bf) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [S680M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s680m66nt4bf) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

I now have enough sourced material for both brands to write a qualitative comparison.

PVolution is a German photovoltaic company headquartered in Grunwald near Munich, operating in the B2B segment and tied commercially to Solar N Plus New Energy Tech. Its project announcements, such as a 2026 supply of 620 Wp modules for a 3 MWp ground-mount array along the A81 motorway in Baden-Wurttemberg, have been covered by pv magazine, indicating real-world utility and commercial installations in the European market. Shinson Technology is a Chinese manufacturer based in Changzhou, founded in 2010, with a claimed annual production capacity of roughly 10 GW and sales operations extending into France, wider Europe, and Australia. Neither brand currently appears on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 bankable manufacturer list, so both should be regarded as niche or regional suppliers rather than bankable Tier 1 players; between the two, Shinson shows the larger disclosed manufacturing footprint and broader international sales presence, while PVolution's footprint is smaller but anchored in documented, verifiable European utility and commercial installations.

Product-wise, PVolution's catalogue (Core, Trion, Onyx, and Unica series) spans crystalline, HJT, TOPCon, and N-type bifacial modules in the 320-700 Wp range, targeting B2B rooftop and ground-mount commercial projects. Shinson's lineup is considerably larger in SKU count, with around 105 panel models spanning PERC, TOPCon, HJT, and bifacial N-type cells across a 265-720 W range, including a lightweight flexible panel (S.Blade). Independent reviewers note that Shinson's breadth across multiple cell technologies suggests a contract-manufacturing or multi-segment strategy rather than one focused premium line, with its panels generally positioned toward budget residential and light commercial rooftops.

For a typical buyer in 2025, the choice depends on priorities: PVolution offers better-documented commercial and utility project references in the European market, which may matter for installers seeking traceable performance history, while Shinson offers a wider model selection and higher peak claimed efficiency (up to about 23.2%) at generally lower price positioning, suited to budget-conscious residential or light commercial deployments. Neither is a mainstream bankable Tier 1 brand, so buyers prioritizing long-term financing bankability should weigh this against either brand's cost or technical advantages.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.de/unternehmensmeldungen/pvolution-liefert-620-wp-hochleistungsmodule-fuer-3-mwp-freiflaechenanlage-direkt-an-der-a81/ \| PVolution supplies 620 Wp modules for 3 MWp solar farm on the A81 \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/people-companies/pvolution/ \| PVolution company profile and news coverage - pv magazine Global \| article

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/shinson-technology \| Shinson Technology Solar Panels Review 2026: Pros, Cons and Specs \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/shinson-technology \| Shinson Technology Co., Ltd. company and product listing \| article

\- https://assets.bnef.com/public/tiering/solarmodules.pdf \| BloombergNEF Tier 1 Solar Module Methodology \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [PVolution vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/pvolution-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Shinson Technology](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-shinson-technology)
- [PVolution vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/pvolution-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Shinson Technology](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-shinson-technology)
- [PVolution vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/pvolution-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Shinson Technology](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-shinson-technology)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/pvolution-vs-shinson-technology

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.