---
title: "PowMr vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare PowMr vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/powmr-vs-trina-solar"
---

# PowMr vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | PowMr | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shenzhen | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2014 | 1997 |
| Employees | 100-200 |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://powmr.com](https://powmr.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

PowMr, the brand name of Shenzhen Hehejin Industrial Co., Ltd., is a Chinese manufacturer specializing in solar charge controllers (MPPT and PWM), pure sine wave inverter chargers, hybrid inverters, and off-grid solar power systems. The company targets residential and small commercial off-grid and hybrid applications...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | PowMr | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | PowMr | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | PowMr | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | PowMr | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | PowMr | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | PowMr | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

PowMr is a Chinese solar equipment brand based in Shenzhen, operating under a name registered in 2018 by Hehejin Industrial Ltd., a company founded in 2014. Its core identity is built around MPPT solar charge controllers and hybrid inverters for off-grid applications, with solar panels positioned as a system add-on rather than a primary product line. PowMr does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability list, and its module production capacity has not been publicly disclosed in industry sources. Trina Solar, by contrast, is one of the world's largest photovoltaic module manufacturers, headquartered in Changzhou, China, and founded in 1997. The company consistently holds Tier 1 status with BloombergNEF - its cumulative global module shipments surpassed 292 GW by mid-2025, and annual production capacity stands at approximately 100 GW, placing it alongside LONGi, Jinko Solar, and JA Solar at the top of the global industry. On institutional footprint alone, Trina Solar operates in an entirely different league.

PowMr targets buyers seeking integrated off-grid or hybrid power systems - typically residential or small-commercial users who prioritize inverter-battery-controller bundles and treat the panels as secondary components. Independent lab certifications and efficiency data for PowMr modules are not readily available in industry publications, which limits objective benchmarking. Trina Solar, on the other hand, offers a clearly segmented product portfolio built on TOPCon cell technology. The Vertex S+ series - including Full Black and hail-resistant Shield variants reaching above 24% efficiency - addresses residential rooftop and C&I segments, while the bifacial Vertex N series, with modules reaching up to 760 W, serves utility-scale ground-mount projects. Both product lines are widely reviewed in trade publications such as pv-magazine and are stocked by major international distributors.

For most international buyers - from homeowners to project developers - Trina Solar is the clear default: confirmed bankability, transparent product and performance warranties, broad after-sales coverage, and a documented record in independent testing. PowMr can make sense as part of a bundled off-grid kit where its inverter or controller is the anchor purchase. As a standalone module choice, the two brands are not interchangeable - they occupy fundamentally different tiers of the market.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [PowMr vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/powmr-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [PowMr vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/powmr-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [PowMr vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/powmr-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/powmr-vs-trina-solar