--- title: "PowMr vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare PowMr vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/powmr-vs-q-cells" --- # PowMr vs Q-Cells Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 0 models). Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | PowMr | Q-Cells | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | South Korea | | Headquarters | Shenzhen | Seoul | | Founded | 2014 | 1999 | | Employees | 100-200 | 2000+ | | Annual capacity | | 11.2 GW/year | | Tier 1 | | yes | | Listed | | NASDAQ: HQCL | | Website | [https://powmr.com](https://powmr.com) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) | PowMr, the brand name of Shenzhen Hehejin Industrial Co., Ltd., is a Chinese manufacturer specializing in solar charge controllers (MPPT and PWM), pure sine wave inverter chargers, hybrid inverters, and off-grid solar power systems. The company targets residential and small commercial off-grid and hybrid applications... Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | PowMr | Q-Cells | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 0 | 89 | +89 | | Max Power | 0 W | 675 W | +675 W | | Avg Power | 0 W | 468 W | +468 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | PowMr | Q-Cells | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | - | 23.20% | | | Avg Efficiency | - | 21.21% | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | PowMr | Q-Cells | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.325%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 35 (39%) | +39 pp | | Avg Warranty | - | 27.0 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | PowMr | Q-Cells | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 0 | 7 (7.9%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 29 (32.6%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 30 (33.7%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 21 (23.6%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 2 (2.2%) | ## Power distribution Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup) | Power band | PowMr | Q-Cells | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 0 | 20 (22.5%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 41 (46.1%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 11 (12.4%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 17 (19.1%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%) | Technology | PowMr | Q-Cells | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 0 | 38 (42.7%) | | N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) | | Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 8 (9.0%) | ## Top panels, Q-Cells | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary PowMr is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Shenzhen, established around 2011, that is primarily known for solar inverters, MPPT charge controllers, and hybrid power systems rather than solar panels as a core product. The company sells through direct-to-consumer online channels and targets the budget, DIY, and off-grid segments globally. PowMr does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 or S&P Global Tier 1 Cleantech lists, and no verified module production capacity figure was found in credible industry sources. Q-Cells, now operating as Hanwha Q CELLS under South Korea's Hanwha Group - which acquired the original German Q-Cells AG in 2012 - occupies a far more prominent institutional position: it holds BloombergNEF's Top Tier bankability score, was named an S&P Global 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech Company, and is targeting module shipments of over 9 GW in 2025, with major manufacturing facilities in Dalton and Cartersville, Georgia. Q-Cells currently makes more solar panels in North America than any other company, a meaningful advantage under the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act. On institutional footprint and bankability, the two brands are not comparable. PowMr's product lineup centers on inverter-chargers, off-grid power electronics, and entry-level solar kits aimed at budget-conscious consumers and small-scale off-grid installations. No large-scale dedicated solar panel product line from PowMr was found in credible industry sources. Q-Cells, by contrast, offers two well-documented panel families: the Q.PEAK DUO series using PERC-based Q.ANTUM technology at efficiencies around 20-21%, suited to cost-sensitive residential and commercial rooftop projects, and the newer Q.TRON series using N-type TOPCon technology - branded Q.ANTUM NEO - that reaches efficiencies up to 22.5% with lower annual degradation and a 25-year product warranty covering labor costs. For any grid-tied solar installation in 2025, Q-Cells is the clear default: it is bankable, installer-certified, U.S.-manufactured, and backed by well-documented warranties and performance guarantees. PowMr can be a reasonable choice for off-grid inverter and charge controller hardware, but it is not a like-for-like solar panel competitor to Q-Cells. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels for 2025 - SolarReviews \| review \- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Q CELLS Solar Panels Complete Review - EnergySage \| review \- https://us.qcells.com/blog/qcells-named-an-sp-global-2025-tier-1-cleantech-company/ \| Qcells Named S&P Global 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech Company \| article \- https://www.enfsolar.com/powmr \| PowMr company profile - ENF Solar directory \| article Sources: \- \[Expert Review Of Qcells Solar Panels For 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review) \- \[Q CELLS Solar Panels Complete Review - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/) \- \[Qcells Named S&P Global 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech Company\](https://us.qcells.com/blog/qcells-named-an-sp-global-2025-tier-1-cleantech-company/) \- \[PowMr company profile - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/powmr) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [PowMr vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/powmr-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells) - [PowMr vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/powmr-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells) - [PowMr vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/powmr-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/powmr-vs-q-cells