---
title: "PolyCrown Solar Tech vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare PolyCrown Solar Tech vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/polycrown-solar-tech-vs-trina-solar"
---

# PolyCrown Solar Tech vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 75 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Ningbo | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2014 | 1997 |
| Employees | 101-200 |  |
| Annual capacity | 0.2 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.polycrown-solar.com](http://www.polycrown-solar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Polycrown Solar Tech Co., Ltd. is a high-tech enterprise founded in 2014, specializing in the research, development, production, and installation of solar products, including solar cells, solar panels, and solar projects. They have passed ISO9001, ISO14001, and OHSAS18001 system certifications, as well as TUV...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 75 | 340 | +265 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 760 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 472 W | 520 W | +48 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.69% | 24.80% | +1.11 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.75% | 21.71% | +0.04 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.294%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.008 |
| Bifacial Share | 14 (19%) | 145 (43%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.9 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +2.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (2.7%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 16 (21.3%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 24 (32.0%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 24 (32.0%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 9 (12.0%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 21 (28.0%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 24 (32.0%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 11 (14.7%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 15 (20.0%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 4 (5.3%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (47%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| N-type | 35 (46.7%) | 6 (1.8%) |
| Unknown | 33 (44.0%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| TOPCon | 7 (9.3%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |


## Top panels, PolyCrown Solar Tech


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [NS-700MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-700mh-132) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-690MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-690mh-132) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [NS-670MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-670mh-132) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [NS-665MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-665mh-132) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NS-660MH-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-660mh-120) | 660 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-660MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-660mh-132) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NS-655MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-655mh-132) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

PolyCrown Solar Tech is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, founded in 2014. The company holds standard quality certifications including ISO9001, ISO14001, and TUV IEC61215, and reports an annual production capacity of approximately 200 MW. It does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list, the industry's principal bankability benchmark used by lenders and project financiers. Trina Solar, by contrast, was founded in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, and has grown into one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers. Its annual production capacity exceeds 50 GW, and cumulative global shipments surpassed 225 GW by early 2025. Trina Solar holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status - reconfirmed in Q1 2025 - and has been recognized as a PVEL Top Performer for eleven consecutive years. In terms of institutional footprint and global market presence, Trina Solar operates on an entirely different scale than PolyCrown Solar Tech.

PolyCrown Solar Tech offers a broad range of panels spanning from small off-grid modules of around 20 W up to units above 400 W, based primarily on PERC monocrystalline cell technology. The brand is positioned in the value segment and is typically suited for residential rooftop installations or small commercial projects where cost per watt is the primary driver. Trina Solar's portfolio is considerably wider and more technologically advanced. The Vertex series, built on 210 mm-wafer N-type TOPCon cells, includes high-power modules rated above 700 W for utility-scale ground-mount projects, as well as the more compact Vertex S+ line targeting residential and commercial and industrial rooftop applications. Confirmed laboratory cell efficiencies above 26% and mass-production module efficiencies near 23% place Trina among the global technology leaders.

For the majority of buyers - whether residential installers in Europe or project developers pursuing bankable financing - Trina Solar is the stronger default choice. Its Tier 1 certification, multi-country manufacturing footprint across China, Thailand, and Vietnam, and a proven track record in commercially financed projects substantially reduce procurement risk. PolyCrown Solar Tech may be a reasonable option for smaller, cost-sensitive installations where lender sign-off is not required and price is the overriding criterion. The two brands are not interchangeable for any project subject to independent financial due diligence.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [PolyCrown Solar Tech vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/polycrown-solar-tech-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [PolyCrown Solar Tech vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/polycrown-solar-tech-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [PolyCrown Solar Tech vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/polycrown-solar-tech-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/polycrown-solar-tech-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.