---
title: "PolyCrown Solar Tech vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare PolyCrown Solar Tech vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/polycrown-solar-tech-vs-q-cells"
---

# PolyCrown Solar Tech vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 75 models). PolyCrown Solar Tech leads on peak efficiency at 23.69%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Ningbo | Seoul |
| Founded | 2014 | 1999 |
| Employees | 101-200 | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity | 0.2 GW/year | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [http://www.polycrown-solar.com](http://www.polycrown-solar.com) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Polycrown Solar Tech Co., Ltd. is a high-tech enterprise founded in 2014, specializing in the research, development, production, and installation of solar products, including solar cells, solar panels, and solar projects. They have passed ISO9001, ISO14001, and OHSAS18001 system certifications, as well as TUV...

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 75 | 89 | +14 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 675 W | +55 W |
| Avg Power | 472 W | 468 W | +3 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.69% | 23.20% | +0.49 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.75% | 21.21% | +0.54 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.294%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.031 |
| Bifacial Share | 14 (19%) | 35 (39%) | +21 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.9 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +1.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

PolyCrown Solar Tech skews to higher efficiency: 12% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (2.7%) | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 16 (21.3%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 24 (32.0%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 24 (32.0%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 9 (12.0%) | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

PolyCrown Solar Tech offers more 600W+ panels (25% of lineup)


| Power band | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 21 (28.0%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 24 (32.0%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 11 (14.7%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 15 (20.0%) | 17 (19.1%) |
| 700W+ | 4 (5.3%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (47%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | PolyCrown Solar Tech | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| N-type | 35 (46.7%) | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 33 (44.0%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| TOPCon | 7 (9.3%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| PERC | 0 | 38 (42.7%) |


## Top panels, PolyCrown Solar Tech


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [NS-700MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-700mh-132) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-690MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-690mh-132) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [NS-670MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-670mh-132) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [NS-665MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-665mh-132) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NS-660MH-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-660mh-120) | 660 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-660MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-660mh-132) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NS-655MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/polycrown-solar-tech-ns-655mh-132) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

PolyCrown Solar Tech is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2014 and headquartered in Ningbo, with an annual production capacity of approximately 200 MW according to ENF Solar and company sources. It holds standard quality certifications including ISO 9001, TUV IEC 61215, and IEC 61730, and operates regional offices in Kenya, Chile, and Poland to serve export markets. No BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability listing for PolyCrown was found in available sources, placing it in the bracket of smaller, niche-volume producers rather than globally bankable suppliers. Q-Cells, originally founded in Germany in 1999 and acquired by South Korea's Hanwha Group in 2012, operates at an entirely different scale - Hanwha Qcells has confirmed BloombergNEF Top Tier bankability status, received an S&P Global 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech designation, and carries module production capacity in the range of 11 to 12 GW per year, with projected shipments exceeding 9 GW in 2025. Q-Cells also has the largest solar module manufacturing facility in the Western Hemisphere in Dalton, Georgia. On institutional footprint, Q-Cells is the stronger brand by a clear margin.

PolyCrown's catalog covers monocrystalline and polycrystalline PERC panels ranging from small off-grid sizes up to roughly 500 W, making it a serviceable option for price-sensitive commercial rooftop or smaller distributed projects in emerging markets where it has established distribution. Q-Cells focuses on higher-value segments with its Q.ANTUM NEO platform, an N-type TOPCon technology family led by the Q.TRON module line reaching efficiencies above 22.5%. Q-Cells addresses residential rooftops, commercial installations, and utility-scale ground mounts, and backs its panels with a 25-year product warranty that guarantees at least 85% output retention - terms that are notably competitive even among premium brands.

For most buyers in 2025, Q-Cells is the stronger default choice. Its bankability, warranty depth, advanced cell technology, and domestic U.S. manufacturing make it suitable for financed projects, residential installs, and any procurement where long-term performance assurance matters. PolyCrown may appeal to budget-constrained buyers or markets where Q-Cells has limited distribution, but the gap in scale, technology, and institutional backing is substantial.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert review of Q-Cells solar panels 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Q-Cells solar panels complete review - EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/q-cells-achieves-top-tier-class-bankability-score-in-latest-bloombergnef-report/ \| Q Cells achieves Top Tier bankability score in BloombergNEF report \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/polycrown-solar-tech \| PolyCrown Solar Tech profile - ENF Solar directory \| article

\- https://www.solarfeeds.com/biz/polycrown-solar-tech/ \| PolyCrown Solar company overview and capacity - SolarFeeds \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [PolyCrown Solar Tech vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/polycrown-solar-tech-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [PolyCrown Solar Tech vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/polycrown-solar-tech-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [PolyCrown Solar Tech vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/polycrown-solar-tech-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/polycrown-solar-tech-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.