---
title: "Pivit vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Pivit vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/pivit-vs-q-cells"
---

# Pivit vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 0 models). Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Pivit | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Poland | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Wrocław | Seoul |
| Founded |  | 1999 |
| Employees |  | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://www.pivit.pl](https://www.pivit.pl) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

PIVIT Sp. z o.o. is a Polish wholesale distributor of photovoltaic system components, including solar panels, inverters, energy storage systems, and mounting structures. The company specializes in premium panel technologies such as HJT (Hyundai), ABC (Aiko), and N-type TopCon (Trina, JA Solar), supplying both the...

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Pivit | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 89 | +89 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 675 W | +675 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 468 W | +468 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Pivit | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 23.20% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.21% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Pivit | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.325%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 35 (39%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 27.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Pivit | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | Pivit | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 17 (19.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Pivit | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 0 | 38 (42.7%) |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 8 (9.0%) |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Pivit is a Polish photovoltaic component wholesaler - PIVIT Sp. z o.o. - operating primarily in European and Asian supply chains rather than manufacturing panels under its own brand. It does not hold a standalone Tier 1 or BloombergNEF bankability rating because it is a distributor, not a producer; its credibility rests on the reputations of the Tier 1 brands it stocks. Q-Cells, formally Hanwha Q CELLS, is a solar module manufacturer with German engineering roots - the company was founded in Germany in 1999, acquired by South Korea's Hanwha Group in 2012, and has since expanded aggressively into North America. Q-Cells carries consistent BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and operates what it describes as the largest silicon solar manufacturing footprint in the Western Hemisphere, with combined US module capacity reaching roughly 8.4 GW annually across facilities in Dalton and Cartersville, Georgia. On institutional footprint and bankability, Q-Cells has no meaningful peer in this comparison.

Pivit's offer is essentially a curated catalog of third-party panels - strategic partners confirmed by the company include Trina Solar, Aiko, Hyundai Energy Solutions, and JA Solar, spanning TOPCon, HJT, and ABC cell technologies. This makes Pivit a flexible procurement channel for installers who want access to several leading brands through a single European wholesaler, covering residential rooftops through utility-scale ground mounts depending on which brand and model is ordered. Q-Cells, by contrast, sells panels manufactured under its own name, with product lines aimed at premium residential and commercial rooftops; independent reviewers at SolarReviews and EcoWatch consistently cite efficiency ratings up to approximately 22.5 percent and temperature coefficients among the lowest in its class, advantages confirmed by WebSearch-sourced reviews rather than assumed.

For a buyer choosing a solar panel brand, the comparison is asymmetrical: Q-Cells is the panel manufacturer, while Pivit is a route to market for panels made by others. A European installer seeking consolidated purchasing and supply chain flexibility may value Pivit's wholesale model, but a buyer who wants a single bankable manufacturer behind the product - one warranty, one technology roadmap, one support chain - will find Q-Cells the more straightforward and institutionally secure choice in 2025.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/pivit \| PIVIT Sp. z o.o. company profile - ENF Solar directory \| article

\- https://solartechonline.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-review-2025/ \| Hanwha Q CELLS Solar Panels Review 2025 - Expert Analysis \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels for 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels \| QCells Solar Panels Review 2025 - Cost, Efficiency and Performance \| review

\- https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-new-cartersville-factory-set-for-33-gw-of-solar-module-production-per-year.do \| Hanwha Qcells Cartersville factory - 3.3 GW annual production capacity \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Pivit vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/pivit-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Pivit vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/pivit-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Pivit vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/pivit-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/pivit-vs-q-cells