---
title: "Phono Solar vs Yingli - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Phono Solar vs Yingli solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-yingli"
---

# Phono Solar vs Yingli

Yingli has the broader catalog (196 vs 174 models). Yingli leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Yingli leans bifacial (57% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Phono Solar | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Nanjing | Baoding, Hebei |
| Founded | 2004 | 1998 |
| Employees | 13000+ | 9000+ |
| Annual capacity | 3-4 GW/year | 2.45 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | OTC Pink: YGEHY |
| Website | [https://www.phonosolar.com](https://www.phonosolar.com) | [http://www.yinglisolar.com](http://www.yinglisolar.com) |

Phono Solar Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, and manufacture of photovoltaic solar panels and is a global provider of solar products and services. The company is affiliated with SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH). Phono Solar has been...

Yingli Solar, also known as Yingli Green Energy, is a leading solar energy company and one of the world's largest vertically integrated PV manufacturers. The company develops, manufactures, and sells PV modules to a wide range of markets. Yingli's mission is to provide affordable green energy for all.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Phono Solar | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 174 | 196 | +22 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 735 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 515 W | 524 W | +9 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Phono Solar | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 24.10% | +0.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.77% | 21.28% | +0.50 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Phono Solar | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.330%/°C | +0.024 |
| Bifacial Share | 74 (43%) | 112 (57%) | +15 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.1 yrs | 27.9 yrs | +0.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Yingli skews to higher efficiency: 21% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Phono Solar | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (1.7%) | 30 (15.3%) |
| 20-21% | 37 (21.3%) | 39 (19.9%) |
| 21-22% | 53 (30.5%) | 42 (21.4%) |
| 22-23% | 62 (35.6%) | 44 (22.4%) |
| 23%+ | 19 (10.9%) | 41 (20.9%) |


## Power distribution

Yingli offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)


| Power band | Phono Solar | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 10 (5.7%) | 32 (16.3%) |
| 400-499W | 78 (44.8%) | 52 (26.5%) |
| 500-599W | 51 (29.3%) | 39 (19.9%) |
| 600-699W | 23 (13.2%) | 62 (31.6%) |
| 700W+ | 12 (6.9%) | 11 (5.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (37%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (32%)


| Technology | Phono Solar | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 65 (37.4%) | 63 (32.1%) |
| TOPCon | 53 (30.5%) | 54 (27.6%) |
| N-type | 50 (28.7%) | 59 (30.1%) |
| HJT | 5 (2.9%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 1 (0.6%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (10.2%) |


## Top panels, Phono Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps730m13gfh-22-wshw) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps725m13gfh-22-wshw) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps720m13gfh-22-wshw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps715m13gfh-22-wshw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wshw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PS705M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Yingli


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [YL735CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl735cf66-f-2) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [YL730CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl730cf66-f-2) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [YL725CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl725cf66-f-2) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [YL720CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl720cf66-f-2) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LF720M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf720m12n-66h-bf) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [YL715CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl715cf66-f-2) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LF715M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf715m12n-66h-bf) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [YL710CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl710cf66-f-2) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LF710M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf710m12n-66h-bf) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LF705M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf705m12n-66h-bf) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Phono Solar is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Nanjing, established in 2004 as a subsidiary of the SUMEC Group, itself part of the Fortune Global 500 SINOMACH state enterprise conglomerate. That state-backed parentage has given Phono Solar an unusually stable financial foundation for a mid-scale brand, and the company has held continuous BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status since 2014, reaffirmed through at least Q2 2025. Annual production capacity stands at roughly 3 to 4 GW, with cumulative global shipments exceeding 20 GW. Yingli Solar, founded in 1998 in Baoding, Hebei, follows a more dramatic arc: it rose to become the world's largest PV module maker by volume in 2012, then spent the years 2015 to 2020 navigating severe debt restructuring. The company has since stabilised, regained BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, and reports annual production capacity in the range of 4 to 7 GW depending on the source consulted. On balance, Phono Solar carries the stronger institutional footprint today, given its uninterrupted Tier 1 record and the implicit support of a state-owned parent.

Both manufacturers now anchor their current portfolios in N-type TOPCon bifacial technology. Phono Solar's lineup spans output classes from residential-scale modules to larger commercial and utility formats, with the flagship Quasar series featuring back-contact cell architecture and module efficiency confirmed above 23%, making it a competitive option for space-constrained residential rooftops as well as utility ground-mount projects. Yingli's equivalent is the Panda 3.0 series, available in Plus and Pro configurations reaching up to 720 Wp at 22.8% module efficiency; the Pro variant targets commercial and industrial rooftops while the Plus is sized for utility-scale ground-mount deployment. Both ranges therefore cover the full application spectrum.

For a typical international buyer, the two brands are broadly interchangeable on technical specifications - both holding Tier 1 status and offering modern N-type TOPCon modules with bifacial gain. Phono Solar is the more conservative institutional choice where lender due diligence requires a clean, uninterrupted bankability record, while Yingli may offer competitive pricing on utility-scale volumes. Buyers wary of Yingli's 2015-2020 difficulties should note the restructuring is complete, but independent financial verification remains advisable before committing to large project exposures.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Phono Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-yingli)
- [Phono Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-yingli)
- [Phono Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-yingli)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-yingli

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.