---
title: "Phono Solar vs Vikram Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Phono Solar vs Vikram Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-vikram-solar"
---

# Phono Solar vs Vikram Solar

Vikram Solar has the broader catalog (202 vs 174 models). Vikram Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.69%. Vikram Solar leans bifacial (74% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Phono Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | India |
| Headquarters | Nanjing | Kolkata |
| Founded | 2004 | 2005 |
| Employees | 13000+ | 1,895 |
| Annual capacity | 3-4 GW/year | 9.5 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | NSE, BSE: VIKRAMSOLR |
| Website | [https://www.phonosolar.com](https://www.phonosolar.com) | [http://www.vikramsolar.com](http://www.vikramsolar.com) |

Phono Solar Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, and manufacture of photovoltaic solar panels and is a global provider of solar products and services. The company is affiliated with SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH). Phono Solar has been...

Vikram Solar Limited is a leading Indian solar photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturer and solar solutions provider. They offer engineering, procurement, construction (EPC), and operations & maintenance (O&M) services for solar plants. The company manufactures high-efficiency solar PV modules and has a pan-India...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Phono Solar | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 174 | 202 | +28 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 735 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 515 W | 553 W | +39 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Phono Solar | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 23.69% | +0.19 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.77% | 21.45% | +0.32 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Phono Solar | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.334%/°C | +0.028 |
| Bifacial Share | 74 (43%) | 150 (74%) | +32 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.1 yrs | 28.6 yrs | +1.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Phono Solar skews to higher efficiency: 11% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Phono Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (1.7%) | 11 (5.4%) |
| 20-21% | 37 (21.3%) | 42 (20.8%) |
| 21-22% | 53 (30.5%) | 106 (52.5%) |
| 22-23% | 62 (35.6%) | 27 (13.4%) |
| 23%+ | 19 (10.9%) | 16 (7.9%) |


## Power distribution

Vikram Solar offers more 600W+ panels (42% of lineup)


| Power band | Phono Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 10 (5.7%) | 12 (5.9%) |
| 400-499W | 78 (44.8%) | 54 (26.7%) |
| 500-599W | 51 (29.3%) | 52 (25.7%) |
| 600-699W | 23 (13.2%) | 69 (34.2%) |
| 700W+ | 12 (6.9%) | 15 (7.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (37%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%)


| Technology | Phono Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 65 (37.4%) | 152 (75.2%) |
| TOPCon | 53 (30.5%) | 8 (4.0%) |
| N-type | 50 (28.7%) | 30 (14.9%) |
| HJT | 5 (2.9%) | 12 (5.9%) |
| Back Contact | 1 (0.6%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Phono Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps730m13gfh-22-wshw) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps725m13gfh-22-wshw) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps720m13gfh-22-wshw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps715m13gfh-22-wshw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wshw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PS705M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Vikram Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-735-05) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-730-05) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-725-05) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Phono Solar is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Nanjing, founded in 2004 as a subsidiary of SUMEC Group Corporation, which is itself part of the state-owned China National Machinery Industry Corporation (Sinomach). This state-enterprise backing provides considerable financial stability, and the company has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status continuously since 2014 - a threshold that was raised in 2025 to require documented financing of projects of at least 10 MW. Annual module production capacity is estimated at approximately 3 to 4 GW. Vikram Solar, by contrast, is an Indian manufacturer founded in 2006 and headquartered in Kolkata, with production plants in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu. After commissioning a major 5 GW facility in Vallam, Tamil Nadu, Vikram Solar's total nameplate capacity reached approximately 9.5 GW in late 2025, making it one of India's largest solar module producers and a confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 manufacturer. In terms of sheer manufacturing scale and institutional momentum, Vikram Solar currently holds the stronger footprint.

Phono Solar's product range spans roughly 320 W to 730 W and covers both PERC and N-type TOPCon cell technologies. Their Draco N-TOPCon line, confirmed in distributor catalogues, targets the high-efficiency segment and is well suited to commercial rooftop and utility ground-mount applications, while lower-wattage PERC bifacial models remain available for residential use. Vikram Solar's portfolio is more diverse by technology mix, incorporating PERC, HJT, and TOPCon cells, with bifacial panels representing a large share of the overall catalogue. The Somera series covers the residential and small commercial rooftop segment with outputs in the 435-465 W range, while the Paradea line addresses larger commercial and utility-scale buyers at 580-605 W. Both manufacturers offer product and power output warranties broadly in line with industry norms, extending up to 27-30 years on performance.

For an international buyer sourcing panels today, both Phono Solar and Vikram Solar are credible, bankable options with confirmed Tier 1 status and mature quality-management processes. Phono Solar's state-owned parentage and long-established presence in Western markets can be an advantage where supply chain continuity and project financing familiarity matter most. Vikram Solar's rapidly scaling Indian manufacturing base appeals to buyers seeking to diversify away from Chinese supply chains - a consideration that has grown in importance given evolving trade policy discussions in Europe and North America. Neither brand is clearly superior across all dimensions; the better default depends primarily on regional supply availability, local distributor support, and the specific demands of the project at hand.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Phono Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-vikram-solar)
- [Phono Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-vikram-solar)
- [Phono Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-vikram-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-vikram-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.