---
title: "Phono Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Phono Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Phono Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 174 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Phono Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Nanjing | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2004 | 1997 |
| Employees | 13000+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 3-4 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.phonosolar.com](https://www.phonosolar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Phono Solar Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, and manufacture of photovoltaic solar panels and is a global provider of solar products and services. The company is affiliated with SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH). Phono Solar has been...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Phono Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 174 | 340 | +166 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 760 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 515 W | 520 W | +5 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Phono Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 24.80% | +1.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.77% | 21.71% | +0.06 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Phono Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.004 |
| Bifacial Share | 74 (43%) | 145 (43%) | +0 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.1 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Phono Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (1.7%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 37 (21.3%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 53 (30.5%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 62 (35.6%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 19 (10.9%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Phono Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 10 (5.7%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 78 (44.8%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 51 (29.3%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 23 (13.2%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 12 (6.9%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (37%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Phono Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 65 (37.4%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| TOPCon | 53 (30.5%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| N-type | 50 (28.7%) | 6 (1.8%) |
| HJT | 5 (2.9%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 1 (0.6%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, Phono Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps730m13gfh-22-wshw) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps725m13gfh-22-wshw) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps720m13gfh-22-wshw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps715m13gfh-22-wshw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wshw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PS705M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Phono Solar is a PV module brand operated by SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of SINOMACH (China National Machinery Industry Corporation), a state-owned Fortune 500 conglomerate ranked 281st on the Fortune 500 list in 2023. SUMEC was established in 1978, and Phono Solar began large-scale module manufacturing in 2008 in Jiangsu Province, China. The company has held Tier 1 status on the BloombergNEF list continuously since 2014, with an annual production capacity of approximately 3 GW. In Europe, Phono Solar operates offices in Germany and the United Kingdom and has completed commercial-scale projects in Belgium and Germany. Trina Solar, by contrast, is one of the largest solar module manufacturers globally, founded in December 1997 by Jifan Gao in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, has cumulative global shipments exceeding 205 GW, and shipped approximately 70 GW in 2024 alone. With operations in over 100 countries and regional headquarters in Zurich, Silicon Valley, Miami, Singapore, and Dubai, Trina Solar carries a considerably larger institutional and commercial footprint.

Phono Solar addresses both residential and commercial segments, with a reputation built around build quality - including low-reflectivity glass, robust junction box sealing, and frames engineered to withstand snow and sand loads. Its bifacial modules carry an extended product warranty, which appeals to buyers evaluating C&I and ground-mount projects. In 2025, Phono Solar earned PVEL Top Performer recognition, providing independent laboratory validation of module reliability. Trina Solar is widely known for its Vertex product family, based on N-type TOPCon cell technology, and has set over 30 world records in module efficiency and output. The Vertex lineup spans residential rooftop installations, large utility-scale ground-mount projects, and commercial C&I applications. Both manufacturers are consistently stocked by distributors serving European and international markets.

For international buyers choosing between the two, both qualify as bankable Tier 1 manufacturers with long warranty commitments and independently verified track records. Trina Solar's considerably larger production scale, cumulative shipment volume, and geographic support infrastructure make it a lower-risk option for large utility-scale or multi-site procurement. Phono Solar's backing by a state-owned Fortune 500 parent and its PVEL Top Performer status make it a credible and competitive alternative, particularly for buyers who prioritise confirmed build durability. In the residential and small commercial segments the two are largely interchangeable, and local pricing, distributor relationships, and after-sales support will often be the deciding factors.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Phono Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Phono Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Phono Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.