---
title: "Phono Solar vs Techwise Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Phono Solar vs Techwise Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-techwise-solar"
---

# Phono Solar vs Techwise Solar

Phono Solar has the broader catalog (174 vs 164 models). Techwise Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Phono Solar | Techwise Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China |  |
| Headquarters | Nanjing |  |
| Founded | 2004 |  |
| Employees | 13000+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 3-4 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.phonosolar.com](https://www.phonosolar.com) |  |

Phono Solar Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, and manufacture of photovoltaic solar panels and is a global provider of solar products and services. The company is affiliated with SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH). Phono Solar has been...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Phono Solar | Techwise Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 174 | 164 | +10 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 720 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 515 W | 530 W | +15 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Phono Solar | Techwise Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 23.80% | +0.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.77% | 21.88% | +0.11 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Phono Solar | Techwise Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.317%/°C | +0.011 |
| Bifacial Share | 74 (43%) | 81 (49%) | +7 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.1 yrs | 27.3 yrs | +0.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Phono Solar skews to higher efficiency: 11% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Phono Solar | Techwise Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (1.7%) | 2 (1.2%) |
| 20-21% | 37 (21.3%) | 25 (15.2%) |
| 21-22% | 53 (30.5%) | 47 (28.7%) |
| 22-23% | 62 (35.6%) | 74 (45.1%) |
| 23%+ | 19 (10.9%) | 15 (9.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 1 (0.6%) |


## Power distribution

Techwise Solar offers more 600W+ panels (27% of lineup)


| Power band | Phono Solar | Techwise Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 10 (5.7%) | 4 (2.4%) |
| 400-499W | 78 (44.8%) | 60 (36.6%) |
| 500-599W | 51 (29.3%) | 55 (33.5%) |
| 600-699W | 23 (13.2%) | 40 (24.4%) |
| 700W+ | 12 (6.9%) | 5 (3.0%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (37%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (70%)


| Technology | Phono Solar | Techwise Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 65 (37.4%) | 46 (28.0%) |
| TOPCon | 53 (30.5%) | 114 (69.5%) |
| N-type | 50 (28.7%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (2.9%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 1 (0.6%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 4 (2.4%) |


## Top panels, Phono Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps730m13gfh-22-wshw) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps725m13gfh-22-wshw) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps720m13gfh-22-wshw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps715m13gfh-22-wshw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wshw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PS705M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Techwise Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TW-720HT-01-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/techwise-solar-tw-720ht-01-720w) | 720 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TW-720HT-01-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/techwise-solar-tw-720ht-01-715w) | 715 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TW-720HT-01-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/techwise-solar-tw-720ht-01-710w) | 710 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TW-720HT-01-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/techwise-solar-tw-720ht-01-705w) | 705 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TW-720HT-01-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/techwise-solar-tw-720ht-01-700w) | 700 | 21.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TW-670HT](https://comparepv.com/panel/techwise-solar-tw-670ht) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TW-665HT](https://comparepv.com/panel/techwise-solar-tw-665ht) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TW-660HT](https://comparepv.com/panel/techwise-solar-tw-660ht) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TW-655HT](https://comparepv.com/panel/techwise-solar-tw-655ht) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TW-650HT](https://comparepv.com/panel/techwise-solar-tw-650ht) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Phono Solar is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Nanjing, founded in 2008 as part of SUMEC Group, itself a subsidiary of SINOMACH - a Fortune Global 500 state-owned conglomerate. That corporate structure translates directly into bankability: Phono Solar has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV module maker status continuously since 2014, signaling recognized creditworthiness with international project finance institutions. The company reports cumulative shipments exceeding 20 GW and current production capacity in the range of 3 to 4 GW per year. Techwise Solar Technology Co., Ltd. is also a Chinese manufacturer, with reported annual production capacity of approximately 1 GW and certifications covering TUV, CE, ISO, and CGC. No BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation for Techwise has been confirmed in publicly available sources, and the company operates partly as an ODM/OEM supplier to larger brands, which limits its independent institutional profile. On the basis of institutional footprint and documented market track record, Phono Solar stands clearly ahead.

Phono Solar's current lineup is built around N-type TOPCon technology in its Draco series, spanning residential rooftop, commercial and industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount applications. Most models feature bifacial dual-glass construction, and the company unveiled a back-contact Quasar module in late 2025 achieving module efficiency above 23%. Phono Solar was also named a Top Performer in Kiwa PVEL's 2025 PV Module Reliability Scorecard, providing independent quality evidence beyond manufacturer warranty claims. Techwise Solar covers a comparable application range - residential, C&I, and ground-mount - and confirmed production includes PERC, TOPCon, and bifacial configurations across several cell formats. However, Techwise has not appeared in published third-party reliability evaluations from bodies such as PVEL, and independent installer reviews are scarce.

For most buyers - from those arranging project finance to installers seeking a panel with verifiable quality benchmarks - Phono Solar is the stronger default choice. Its decade-long Tier 1 status, PVEL recognition, and production scale under a state-backed parent company reduce both counterparty and warranty risk meaningfully. Techwise Solar may suit price-sensitive procurement or B2B buyers specifically seeking ODM capacity, but the limited third-party validation makes side-by-side assessment difficult. The two brands are not equivalent in the weight of verifiable evidence available to support a purchasing decision.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Phono Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Techwise Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-techwise-solar)
- [Phono Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Techwise Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-techwise-solar)
- [Phono Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Techwise Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-techwise-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-techwise-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.