---
title: "Phono Solar vs Talesun - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Phono Solar vs Talesun solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-talesun"
---

# Phono Solar vs Talesun

Phono Solar has the broader catalog (174 vs 144 models). Talesun leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Talesun leans bifacial (59% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Phono Solar | Talesun |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Nanjing | Suzhou |
| Founded | 2004 | 2010 |
| Employees | 13000+ | 501 |
| Annual capacity | 3-4 GW/year | 5+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.phonosolar.com](https://www.phonosolar.com) | [http://www.talesun.com](http://www.talesun.com) |

Phono Solar Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, and manufacture of photovoltaic solar panels and is a global provider of solar products and services. The company is affiliated with SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH). Phono Solar has been...

Talesun Solar, a subsidiary of Zhongli Group, is a leading global photovoltaic manufacturer specializing in the development, manufacturing, and delivery of high-quality solar modules and integrated PV energy solutions. The company provides clean and affordable PV energy solutions for residential, commercial, and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Phono Solar | Talesun | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 174 | 144 | +30 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 710 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 515 W | 564 W | +49 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Phono Solar | Talesun | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 24.80% | +1.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.77% | 22.14% | +0.37 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Phono Solar | Talesun | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.304%/°C | +0.002 |
| Bifacial Share | 74 (43%) | 85 (59%) | +16 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.1 yrs | 28.8 yrs | +1.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Talesun skews to higher efficiency: 28% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Phono Solar | Talesun |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (1.7%) | 5 (3.5%) |
| 20-21% | 37 (21.3%) | 24 (16.7%) |
| 21-22% | 53 (30.5%) | 32 (22.2%) |
| 22-23% | 62 (35.6%) | 43 (29.9%) |
| 23%+ | 19 (10.9%) | 40 (27.8%) |


## Power distribution

Talesun offers more 600W+ panels (49% of lineup)


| Power band | Phono Solar | Talesun |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 10 (5.7%) | 8 (5.6%) |
| 400-499W | 78 (44.8%) | 32 (22.2%) |
| 500-599W | 51 (29.3%) | 34 (23.6%) |
| 600-699W | 23 (13.2%) | 67 (46.5%) |
| 700W+ | 12 (6.9%) | 3 (2.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (37%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (44%)


| Technology | Phono Solar | Talesun |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 65 (37.4%) | 51 (35.4%) |
| TOPCon | 53 (30.5%) | 63 (43.8%) |
| N-type | 50 (28.7%) | 17 (11.8%) |
| HJT | 5 (2.9%) | 8 (5.6%) |
| Back Contact | 1 (0.6%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 5 (3.5%) |


## Top panels, Phono Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps730m13gfh-22-wshw) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps725m13gfh-22-wshw) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps720m13gfh-22-wshw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps715m13gfh-22-wshw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wshw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PS705M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Talesun


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TM8G66M-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/talesun-tm8g66m-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TM8G66M-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/talesun-tm8g66m-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TM8G66M-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/talesun-tm8g66m-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TM8G66M-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/talesun-tm8g66m-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TM8G66M-690](https://comparepv.com/panel/talesun-tm8g66m-690) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TD8G66M/670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/talesun-td8g66m-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TP8F66M-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/talesun-tp8f66m-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CIPRO-TN9C72M(H)-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/talesun-cipro-tn9c72m-h-670) | 670 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TD8G66M/665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/talesun-td8g66m-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TP8F66M-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/talesun-tp8f66m-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Phono Solar is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Nanjing, founded in 2004 as the photovoltaic arm of SUMEC Group - a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation. The company has held Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankable status continuously since 2014, giving it one of the longer unbroken records of institutional recognition among mid-scale Chinese module makers. Annual production capacity is approximately 3-4 GW, with cumulative global shipments exceeding 20 GW. Talesun was founded in 2010, also in China, and achieved BNEF Tier 1 status in Q1 2025 - a more recent milestone, but one backed by considerably larger manufacturing scale, with annual capacity reported at around 13 GW and cumulative shipments surpassing 36 GW. On the dimension of institutional footprint, Talesun leads by volume, while Phono Solar holds the advantage of a longer and more established bankability track record.

Phono Solar covers a broad power range of roughly 320 W to over 700 W, addressing residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale ground-mount applications. Its portfolio includes both PERC and N-type TOPCon cell technologies, with bifacial configurations available across multiple series. The company also operates manufacturing facilities outside China - in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Turkey - which may matter for buyers navigating import tariff regimes. Talesun likewise spans a wide power band from around 280 W to 700 W, and has made its BIPRO series - based on N-type TOPCon bifacial dual-glass construction - a flagship product aimed at C&I and utility ground-mount projects where rear-side energy gain adds measurable yield. Both brands supply European distribution channels and have active international logistics networks.

For most international buyers, the two brands occupy essentially the same competitive tier: both carry BNEF Tier 1 status, both offer modern N-type TOPCon technology, and both provide performance warranties of 27-30 years. Phono Solar's longer Tier 1 history gives it a modest edge in project-finance contexts where lenders scrutinize bankability tenure. Talesun's larger production scale could translate to stronger supply consistency and more competitive pricing on bulk procurement. Neither brand is a clear default choice over the other, and in most procurement decisions the determining factors will be local distributor pricing, delivery lead times, and project-specific technical requirements.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Phono Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Talesun](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-talesun)
- [Phono Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Talesun](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-talesun)
- [Phono Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Talesun](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-talesun)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-talesun

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.