---
title: "Phono Solar vs Sunlike Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Phono Solar vs Sunlike Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-sunlike-solar"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/phono-solar/sunlike-solar.png"
---

# Phono Solar vs Sunlike Solar

Phono Solar has the broader catalog (174 vs 135 models). Sunlike Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.52%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Phono Solar | Sunlike Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Nanjing | Wuxi, Jiangsu |
| Founded | 2004 | 2010 |
| Employees | 13000+ | 300 |
| Annual capacity | 3-4 GW/year | 2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.phonosolar.com](https://www.phonosolar.com) | [http://www.sunlikesolar.com](http://www.sunlikesolar.com) |

Phono Solar Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, and manufacture of photovoltaic solar panels and is a global provider of solar products and services. The company is affiliated with SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH). Phono Solar has been...

Sunlike Solar Co., Ltd. is a high-tech enterprise specializing in researching, developing, designing, and producing new energy and renewable energy products. They offer various high-efficiency monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar cells and solar modules ranging from 200W to 750W. Their production capacity has...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Phono Solar | Sunlike Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 174 | 135 | +39 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 675 W | +55 W |
| Avg Power | 515 W | 493 W | +22 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Phono Solar | Sunlike Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 23.52% | +0.02 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.77% | 21.19% | +0.58 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Phono Solar | Sunlike Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.328%/°C | +0.023 |
| Bifacial Share | 74 (43%) | 57 (42%) | +0 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.1 yrs | 27.2 yrs | +0.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Phono Solar skews to higher efficiency: 11% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Phono Solar | Sunlike Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (1.7%) | 16 (11.9%) |
| 20-21% | 37 (21.3%) | 41 (30.4%) |
| 21-22% | 53 (30.5%) | 36 (26.7%) |
| 22-23% | 62 (35.6%) | 35 (25.9%) |
| 23%+ | 19 (10.9%) | 7 (5.2%) |


## Power distribution

Phono Solar offers more 600W+ panels (20% of lineup)


| Power band | Phono Solar | Sunlike Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 10 (5.7%) | 16 (11.9%) |
| 400-499W | 78 (44.8%) | 67 (49.6%) |
| 500-599W | 51 (29.3%) | 26 (19.3%) |
| 600-699W | 23 (13.2%) | 26 (19.3%) |
| 700W+ | 12 (6.9%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: PERC (37%)

Dominant cell tech: PERC (38%)


| Technology | Phono Solar | Sunlike Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 65 (37.4%) | 51 (37.8%) |
| TOPCon | 53 (30.5%) | 18 (13.3%) |
| N-type | 50 (28.7%) | 27 (20.0%) |
| HJT | 5 (2.9%) | 5 (3.7%) |
| Back Contact | 1 (0.6%) | 4 (3.0%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 30 (22.2%) |


## Top panels, Phono Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps730m13gfh-22-wshw) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps725m13gfh-22-wshw) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps720m13gfh-22-wshw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps715m13gfh-22-wshw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wshw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PS705M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Sunlike Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LNET-675M](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-675m) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LNET-670M](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-670m) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LNET-670MD](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-670md) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LNET-665M](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-665m) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LNET-665MD](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-665md) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LNET-660M](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-660m) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LNET-660MD](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-660md) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LNET-655M](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-655m) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LNET-655MD](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-655md) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LNET-650MD](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-650md) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Phono Solar Technology Co., Ltd. is a Chinese solar module manufacturer headquartered in Nanjing, established in 2004 under the umbrella of SUMEC Group, itself a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH) - a Fortune 500 state-owned industrial conglomerate. This institutional backing gives Phono Solar an unusual degree of financial resilience for a mid-sized manufacturer. The company has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status continuously since 2014, meaning lenders and project financiers recognize its modules as bankable collateral for debt-financed solar projects. Phono Solar has cumulatively shipped over 20 GW of modules worldwide, positioning it firmly in the mid-tier segment - well below the shipment volumes of JinkoSolar or LONGi, but with considerably stronger institutional credibility than smaller or unranked brands. Sunlike Solar, by contrast, does not appear in any major industry registry, Tier 1 list, or independent analyst review that could be located through current sources, suggesting it is either a niche regional brand or a relatively recent entrant without an established bankability track record.

Phono Solar's current product lineup spans PERC, N-type TOPCon, and HJT technologies, including bifacial dual-glass modules in the Draco series reaching up to 730 Wp, as confirmed by multiple distributor and industry sources. This breadth covers residential rooftop, commercial and industrial rooftop, and utility-scale ground-mount applications equally well. For international buyers evaluating project finance requirements or long-term warranty security, the SINOMACH corporate backstop and the uninterrupted BNEF Tier 1 designation are tangible risk mitigants that a lesser-known brand simply cannot match at this time.

For most buyers, Phono Solar is the more defensible choice: it carries a verified supply history, a bankable rating, and a diversified technology portfolio. Sunlike Solar cannot be fairly compared on equal terms given the absence of independently verifiable data on its capacity, cell technology, or warranty track record - a local installer with direct experience of the brand would be the right source before committing to a purchase.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Phono Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Sunlike Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sunlike-solar)
- [Phono Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Sunlike Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sunlike-solar)
- [Phono Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Sunlike Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sunlike-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-sunlike-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.