---
title: "Phono Solar vs SunEvo Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Phono Solar vs SunEvo Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-sunevo-solar"
---

# Phono Solar vs SunEvo Solar

SunEvo Solar has the broader catalog (204 vs 174 models). SunEvo Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Phono Solar | SunEvo Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Nanjing | Hefei |
| Founded | 2004 |  |
| Employees | 13000+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 3-4 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.phonosolar.com](https://www.phonosolar.com) | [https://www.sunevosolar.com](https://www.sunevosolar.com) |

Phono Solar Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, and manufacture of photovoltaic solar panels and is a global provider of solar products and services. The company is affiliated with SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH). Phono Solar has been...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Phono Solar | SunEvo Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 174 | 204 | +30 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 750 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 515 W | 528 W | +13 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Phono Solar | SunEvo Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 24.10% | +0.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.77% | 21.92% | +0.14 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Phono Solar | SunEvo Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.303%/°C | +0.003 |
| Bifacial Share | 74 (43%) | 96 (47%) | +5 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.1 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

SunEvo Solar skews to higher efficiency: 13% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Phono Solar | SunEvo Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (1.7%) | 6 (2.9%) |
| 20-21% | 37 (21.3%) | 19 (9.3%) |
| 21-22% | 53 (30.5%) | 52 (25.5%) |
| 22-23% | 62 (35.6%) | 100 (49.0%) |
| 23%+ | 19 (10.9%) | 27 (13.2%) |


## Power distribution

SunEvo Solar offers more 600W+ panels (32% of lineup)


| Power band | Phono Solar | SunEvo Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 10 (5.7%) | 6 (2.9%) |
| 400-499W | 78 (44.8%) | 89 (43.6%) |
| 500-599W | 51 (29.3%) | 44 (21.6%) |
| 600-699W | 23 (13.2%) | 47 (23.0%) |
| 700W+ | 12 (6.9%) | 18 (8.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (37%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (47%)


| Technology | Phono Solar | SunEvo Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 65 (37.4%) | 20 (9.8%) |
| TOPCon | 53 (30.5%) | 96 (47.1%) |
| N-type | 50 (28.7%) | 5 (2.5%) |
| HJT | 5 (2.9%) | 24 (11.8%) |
| Back Contact | 1 (0.6%) | 32 (15.7%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 27 (13.2%) |


## Top panels, Phono Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps730m13gfh-22-wshw) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps725m13gfh-22-wshw) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps720m13gfh-22-wshw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps715m13gfh-22-wshw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wshw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PS705M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, SunEvo Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE6-66HBD-750W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-750w) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE6-66HBD-745W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-745w) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE6-66HBD-740W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-740w) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE6-66HBD-735W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-735w) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE6-66HBD-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SE6-66HBD-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SE6-66HBD-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SE6-66HBD-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SE6-66HBD-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SE6-66HBD-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Phono Solar is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Nanjing, founded in 2008 as part of the Sumec Group, which is itself a subsidiary of Sinomach - a Chinese state-owned enterprise and Global Fortune 500 conglomerate. That institutional backing has underpinned Phono Solar's continuous placement on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 bankability list since 2014, making it one of the longer-standing and most independently verified names in the global module market. The company operates factories in Nanjing and Zhangjiagang with an annual production capacity of approximately 3 GW. SunEvo Solar, founded in 2011 and based in Hefei, Anhui province, is a younger and somewhat lower-profile player; the company self-reports Tier 1 status and claims product deployment across more than 80 countries, but independent confirmation of a continuous BNEF listing comparable to Phono Solar's multi-year track record is difficult to establish from publicly available sources. On institutional footprint and traceable bankability history, Phono Solar holds a clear advantage.

Phono Solar's product lineup covers PERC, TOPCon, HJT, and N-type bifacial modules suited for residential rooftop systems, commercial and industrial (C&I) applications, and utility-scale ground-mount projects, with output ratings reaching beyond 700 Wp in recent series. The company earned Top Performer recognition in PVEL's 2025 PV Module Reliability Scorecard, adding a meaningful layer of third-party quality validation. SunEvo Solar likewise targets residential, C&I, and utility segments through PERC, TOPCon, HJT, and back-contact cell technologies, and holds certifications from TUV SUD and DEKRA that provide a baseline quality assurance signal. However, it has not accumulated the same depth of independent performance test recognition that Phono Solar has built over a longer market presence.

For most international buyers - particularly those involved in financed projects, EPC procurement, or commercial-scale installations where lender acceptance is a factor - Phono Solar is the more prudent default, given its verifiable bankability record and third-party scorecard results. SunEvo Solar is a viable option for cost-sensitive buyers or smaller off-grid and residential projects where Tier 1 pedigree is less critical, but buyers should independently verify its current BNEF listing status before committing to large-volume orders. In terms of technology breadth, the two brands are broadly comparable; the meaningful difference lies in documented institutional credibility.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Phono Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs SunEvo Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sunevo-solar)
- [Phono Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs SunEvo Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sunevo-solar)
- [Phono Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs SunEvo Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sunevo-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-sunevo-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.