---
title: "Phono Solar vs Runergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Phono Solar vs Runergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-runergy"
---

# Phono Solar vs Runergy

Phono Solar has the broader catalog (174 vs 124 models). Runergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Phono Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Nanjing | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province |
| Founded | 2004 | 2013 |
| Employees | 13000+ | 15,000 |
| Annual capacity | 3-4 GW/year | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.phonosolar.com](https://www.phonosolar.com) | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) |

Phono Solar Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, and manufacture of photovoltaic solar panels and is a global provider of solar products and services. The company is affiliated with SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH). Phono Solar has been...

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Phono Solar | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 174 | 124 | +50 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 740 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 515 W | 579 W | +64 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Phono Solar | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 24.10% | +0.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.77% | 22.42% | +0.64 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Phono Solar | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.298%/°C | +0.007 |
| Bifacial Share | 74 (43%) | 95 (77%) | +34 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.1 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +1.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Phono Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (1.7%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 37 (21.3%) | 9 (7.3%) |
| 21-22% | 53 (30.5%) | 26 (21.0%) |
| 22-23% | 62 (35.6%) | 48 (38.7%) |
| 23%+ | 19 (10.9%) | 41 (33.1%) |


## Power distribution

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)


| Power band | Phono Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 10 (5.7%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 78 (44.8%) | 36 (29.0%) |
| 500-599W | 51 (29.3%) | 28 (22.6%) |
| 600-699W | 23 (13.2%) | 35 (28.2%) |
| 700W+ | 12 (6.9%) | 25 (20.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (37%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (60%)


| Technology | Phono Solar | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 65 (37.4%) | 32 (25.8%) |
| TOPCon | 53 (30.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 50 (28.7%) | 74 (59.7%) |
| HJT | 5 (2.9%) | 18 (14.5%) |
| Back Contact | 1 (0.6%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Phono Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps730m13gfh-22-wshw) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps725m13gfh-22-wshw) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps720m13gfh-22-wshw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps715m13gfh-22-wshw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wshw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PS705M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Runergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Phono Solar is a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer founded in 2007 and affiliated with the Sumec group, and it has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status continuously since 2014, making it one of the longer-standing names on that list even though its manufacturing footprint is comparatively modest, at roughly 4 GW of module and 5 GW of cell capacity per year, with cumulative shipments reported to exceed 20 GW. Runergy, formally Jiangsu Runergy New Energy Technology, has also secured BNEF Tier 1 status across multiple consecutive quarters, but operates at a much larger industrial scale, with module capacity around 23 GW and cell capacity reported as high as 63 GW annually, placing it among the larger global component suppliers. On institutional footprint and production scale, Runergy is clearly the heavier-weight player today.

Phono Solar's catalog leans toward residential rooftop systems and smaller commercial projects, built mainly around conventional mono-PERC cell technology alongside newer lines it has introduced over time. Runergy, by contrast, has concentrated its lineup around N-type TOPCon cells, offering bifacial modules in large wafer formats rated up to roughly 580-740 watts, aimed primarily at utility-scale ground-mount farms and large commercial rooftops, while still keeping some residential-sized options available.

For a typical international buyer, both brands are reasonable choices given their shared Tier 1 standing: Phono Solar suits smaller, conventional rooftop projects, while Runergy is the stronger default for larger commercial or ground-mount installations where high-wattage TOPCon modules and bifacial gains matter most. The gap isn't wide enough to rule either brand out outright - the decision should come down to project scale and what a given distributor actually stocks rather than a clear quality gap between them.

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Phono Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy)
- [Phono Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runergy)
- [Phono Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-runergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-runergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.