---
title: "Phono Solar vs AKCOME - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Phono Solar vs AKCOME solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-akcome"
---

# Phono Solar vs AKCOME

Phono Solar has the broader catalog (174 vs 3 models). Phono Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.50%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Phono Solar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Nanjing | Suzhou |
| Founded | 2004 | 2003 |
| Employees | 13000+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 3-4 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.phonosolar.com](https://www.phonosolar.com) | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) |

Phono Solar Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, and manufacture of photovoltaic solar panels and is a global provider of solar products and services. The company is affiliated with SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH). Phono Solar has been...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Phono Solar | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 174 | 3 | +171 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 700 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 515 W | 672 W | +157 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Phono Solar | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 22.54% | +0.96 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.77% | 21.63% | +0.15 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Phono Solar | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.240%/°C | +0.066 |
| Bifacial Share | 74 (43%) | 3 (100%) | +57 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.1 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +2.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Phono Solar skews to higher efficiency: 11% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Phono Solar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (1.7%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 37 (21.3%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 53 (30.5%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 22-23% | 62 (35.6%) | 1 (33.3%) |
| 23%+ | 19 (10.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | Phono Solar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 10 (5.7%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 78 (44.8%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 51 (29.3%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 23 (13.2%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 700W+ | 12 (6.9%) | 1 (33.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (37%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | Phono Solar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 65 (37.4%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 53 (30.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 50 (28.7%) | 0 |
| HJT | 5 (2.9%) | 3 (100.0%) |
| Back Contact | 1 (0.6%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Phono Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps730m13gfh-22-wshw) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps725m13gfh-22-wshw) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps720m13gfh-22-wshw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps715m13gfh-22-wshw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wshw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PS705M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Phono Solar is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, founded in 2004 as a subsidiary of SUMEC Group, itself a division of Fortune 500 conglomerate China National Machinery Industry Corporation (Sinomach). That state-enterprise backing has helped Phono maintain a continuous BNEF Tier 1 bankability rating since 2014. The company has shipped more than 20 GW of modules over its history and operates with an annual production capacity of approximately 3 GW, according to third-party reviews. AKCOME was established in 2006 in Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu Province, and went public on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2011. It held a BNEF Tier 1 position as recently as 2022, but was removed from that ranking in 2024, a development that coincided with its Zhejiang subsidiary filing for bankruptcy that same year due to an inability to meet debt obligations. On institutional footprint and financial stability, Phono Solar holds a clear advantage.

Phono Solar's product range covers both residential and commercial applications, with its portfolio spanning conventional module sizes up to larger-format panels, and the company has moved into back-contact bifacial modules - its "Quasar" line, confirmed in late 2025, achieves a module efficiency of 23.27% and is positioned toward premium rooftop and commercial-rooftop buyers. AKCOME built its identity almost entirely around HJT (heterojunction) technology, at one point claiming cell efficiencies near 24.7% and offering a 30-year performance warranty to differentiate itself from mainstream competitors. The HJT focus gave AKCOME a credible niche in high-efficiency applications, but the company was delisted from the TaiyangNews TOP SOLAR MODULES ranking after its website became inaccessible, limiting third-party validation of its current lineup.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Phono Solar is the more prudent default. Its Tier 1 status, state-backed parent, and active product development provide the kind of long-term warranty security that most residential and commercial customers need. AKCOME's HJT technology story was genuinely interesting, but ongoing financial distress and the loss of bankability recognition introduce real counterparty risk that is hard to overlook, particularly for projects where the manufacturer's 25-to-30-year guarantee is a core part of the business case.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/oscars-of-solar-industry-upgraded-phono-secures-bnef-tier-1-ranking-again/ \| Phono Solar secures BNEF Tier 1 ranking - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/phono-solar-panel-review \| Phono Solar panel review - cost, products, and warranties \| review

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome solar panels - independent review by Solar Choice \| review

\- https://taiyangnews.info/topmodules/top-solar-modules-listing-january-2025 \| TOP SOLAR MODULES listing January 2025 - TaiyangNews \| article

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome \| AKCOME solar panels review 2026 - pros, cons and specs \| review

Sources:

\- \[Phono Solar secures BNEF Tier 1 ranking - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/oscars-of-solar-industry-upgraded-phono-secures-bnef-tier-1-ranking-again/)

\- \[Phono Solar panel review - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/phono-solar-panel-review)

\- \[Akcome solar panels review - Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/)

\- \[TOP SOLAR MODULES listing January 2025 - TaiyangNews\](https://taiyangnews.info/topmodules/top-solar-modules-listing-january-2025)

\- \[AKCOME solar panels review 2026 - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Phono Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome)
- [Phono Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-akcome)
- [Phono Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-akcome

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.