---
title: "Phono Solar vs AE Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Phono Solar vs AE Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-ae-solar"
---

# Phono Solar vs AE Solar

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 174 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%. AE Solar leans bifacial (63% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Phono Solar | AE Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Germany |
| Headquarters | Nanjing | Gersthofen |
| Founded | 2004 | 2003 |
| Employees | 13000+ | 501-1000 |
| Annual capacity | 3-4 GW/year | 2+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.phonosolar.com](https://www.phonosolar.com) | [https://ae-solar.com](https://ae-solar.com) |

Phono Solar Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, and manufacture of photovoltaic solar panels and is a global provider of solar products and services. The company is affiliated with SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH). Phono Solar has been...

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Phono Solar | AE Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 174 | 646 | +472 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 730 W |  |
| Avg Power | 515 W | 489 W | +26 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Phono Solar | AE Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 24.43% | +0.93 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.77% | 21.11% | +0.67 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Phono Solar | AE Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.306%/°C | -0.312%/°C | +0.006 |
| Bifacial Share | 74 (43%) | 405 (63%) | +20 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.1 yrs | 29.7 yrs | +2.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Phono Solar skews to higher efficiency: 11% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Phono Solar | AE Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (1.7%) | 74 (11.5%) |
| 20-21% | 37 (21.3%) | 171 (26.5%) |
| 21-22% | 53 (30.5%) | 142 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 62 (35.6%) | 199 (30.8%) |
| 23%+ | 19 (10.9%) | 60 (9.3%) |


## Power distribution

Phono Solar offers more 600W+ panels (20% of lineup)


| Power band | Phono Solar | AE Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 10 (5.7%) | 78 (12.1%) |
| 400-499W | 78 (44.8%) | 329 (50.9%) |
| 500-599W | 51 (29.3%) | 154 (23.8%) |
| 600-699W | 23 (13.2%) | 55 (8.5%) |
| 700W+ | 12 (6.9%) | 30 (4.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (37%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (54%)


| Technology | Phono Solar | AE Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 65 (37.4%) | 245 (37.9%) |
| TOPCon | 53 (30.5%) | 349 (54.0%) |
| N-type | 50 (28.7%) | 17 (2.6%) |
| HJT | 5 (2.9%) | 5 (0.8%) |
| Back Contact | 1 (0.6%) | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 9 (1.4%) |


## Top panels, Phono Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps730m13gfh-22-wshw) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps725m13gfh-22-wshw) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps720m13gfh-22-wshw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps715m13gfh-22-wshw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wshw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PS705M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AE Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CME-132BDS-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CME-132BDS-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CME-132BDS-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CME-132-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CME-132BDS-725W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-725w) | 725 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AE CME-132 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CME-132BDS-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AE CME-132-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-ae-cme-132-720-1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CME-132-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CME-132BDS-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ae-solar-cme-132bds-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AE Solar was founded in 2003 in Königsbrunn, Germany, making it one of the earlier European-branded solar manufacturers, with production facilities spread across China, Georgia, and Turkey. The company employs between 500 and 1,000 people and operates at a production capacity exceeding 2 GW. Phono Solar, founded a year later in 2004 and headquartered in China, is a considerably larger operation, with a workforce of over 13,000 and a production capacity of 3-4 GW. Both manufacturers hold Bloomberg Tier 1 bankable status, confirming their financial standing and suitability for financed projects. AE Solar's broad catalog of 442 panels contrasts with Phono Solar's more focused lineup of 173 panels - reflecting AE Solar's strategy of covering a wide application range versus Phono Solar's more curated offering.

On the technology side, AE Solar's portfolio is led by TOPCon cells, representing nearly 50% of its lineup and driving a maximum panel efficiency of 24.43% and an average of 21.34%. Its bifacial share stands at a high 64%, and the average warranty across the range reaches nearly 30 years - a strong figure by industry standards. These characteristics make AE Solar a compelling option for residential rooftop installs where roof space is limited, and for commercial C&I projects where long-term performance guarantees carry weight. Phono Solar's portfolio remains anchored in PERC technology at around 38% of its range, though the company has been moving toward higher-efficiency formats. Its average module power of approximately 515 Wp edges out AE Solar's 497 Wp average, and its temperature coefficient of -0.306 percent per degree Celsius offers a marginal advantage over AE Solar's -0.313 percent in warmer climates. Phono Solar's scale and pricing position it well for utility-scale ground-mount projects where volume and supply consistency are the primary procurement criteria. Both manufacturers have received PVEL Top Performer recognition, reinforcing quality credentials across the board.

For international buyers weighing the two, AE Solar suits buyers who prioritize a wide TOPCon-led portfolio, a strong European support network, and a near-30-year average warranty - particularly for distributed residential and C&I segments. Phono Solar is better suited to large-scale procurement scenarios where manufacturing depth, competitive pricing, and slightly higher average wattage per panel translate into meaningful project economics at scale.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Phono Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AEET vs AE Solar](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-ae-solar)
- [Phono Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs AE Solar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-ae-solar)
- [Phono Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AE Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-ae-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/phono-solar-vs-ae-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.