---
title: "Peimar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Peimar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/peimar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Peimar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 5 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Peimar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Italy | China |
| Headquarters | Torino | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2012 | 1997 |
| Employees | 50 |  |
| Annual capacity | 0.3 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.peimar.com](https://www.peimar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Peimar is an Italian manufacturer of photovoltaic modules. Based in Turin, the company designs and produces solar panels for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications, with a focus on the European market.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Peimar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 5 | 340 | +335 |
| Max Power | 595 W | 760 W | +165 W |
| Avg Power | 440 W | 520 W | +80 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Peimar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.04% | 24.80% | +1.76 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.23% | 21.71% | +1.49 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Peimar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.346%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.044 |
| Bifacial Share | 2 (40%) | 145 (43%) | +3 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Peimar skews to higher efficiency: 40% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Peimar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (40.0%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 21-22% | 1 (20.0%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (40.0%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Peimar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (40.0%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 1 (20.0%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 2 (40.0%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (60%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Peimar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 3 (60.0%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| TOPCon | 2 (40.0%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Peimar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [OR10H595MNDB](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-or10h595mndb) | 595 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SA500M (FB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sa500m-fb) | 500 | 21.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [OR10H450MNDB (FB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-or10h450mndb-fb) | 450 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SG330P](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sg330p) | 330 | 17.0 | -0.430 | Polycrystalline |
| 5 | [SG325P](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sg325p) | 325 | 16.7 | -0.430 | Polycrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Peimar is an Italian solar manufacturer founded in 2007 and headquartered in Brescia, with its primary production facility in nearby Castegnato and a secondary factory in Ningbo, China, bringing estimated combined annual output to roughly 450 MW. The company does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability list, a reflection of its production scale rather than a judgment on module quality. Trina Solar was founded in 1997 in Changzhou, China, by Gao Jifan and has grown into one of the world's leading module suppliers, consistently holding BloombergNEF Tier 1 status - reconfirmed in Q1 2025 - with cumulative global shipments surpassing 225 GW by early 2025 and a module production capacity measured in the tens of gigawatts per year. In terms of institutional footprint, global financing access, and supply-chain depth, Trina Solar operates on a categorically different scale than Peimar.

Peimar's catalog centers on monocrystalline PERC modules ranging from compact off-grid panels for RV and marine use up to 500 W modules suited to residential rooftops and light commercial installations. The brand has carved out a credible niche in European markets partly through full-black aesthetic panels and a warranty package that stands out in its price tier - a 20-year product warranty and a 30-year linear power guarantee exceed what most mid-range competitors offer. Trina Solar serves the entire project spectrum through its Vertex N line of large-format 210 mm TOPCon modules, which are engineered for utility-scale ground-mount plants as well as large commercial and industrial (C&I) rooftop deployments. The company has been advancing TOPCon Ultra cell technology and recorded an industrial cell efficiency of 26.58%, signaling its commitment to next-generation architectures.

For an international buyer weighing the two, the right choice depends heavily on project scale and financing context. Peimar is a sound option for European residential and small commercial buyers who value documented European manufacturing, strong warranty terms, and a mid-tier price point. Trina Solar is the stronger default for any project where bankability, lender recognition, and long-term supply certainty are non-negotiable - precisely the attributes that BloombergNEF Tier 1 standing supports. In straightforward residential deployments the performance gap narrows considerably, and the two brands become broadly interchangeable, with the final call often driven by local installer relationships and prevailing spot pricing.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Peimar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/peimar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Peimar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/peimar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Peimar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/peimar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/peimar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.