---
title: "Peimar vs Recom - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Peimar vs Recom solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/peimar-vs-recom"
---

# Peimar vs Recom

Recom has the broader catalog (61 vs 5 models). Recom leads on peak efficiency at 24.30%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Peimar | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Italy | Italy |
| Headquarters | Torino | Bolzano |
| Founded | 2012 | 2007 |
| Employees | 50 |  |
| Annual capacity | 0.3 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.peimar.com](https://www.peimar.com) | [https://www.recom-tech.com](https://www.recom-tech.com) |

Peimar is an Italian manufacturer of photovoltaic modules. Based in Turin, the company designs and produces solar panels for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications, with a focus on the European market.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Peimar | Recom | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 5 | 61 | +56 |
| Max Power | 595 W | 730 W | +135 W |
| Avg Power | 440 W | 548 W | +108 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Peimar | Recom | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.04% | 24.30% | +1.26 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.23% | 22.68% | +2.45 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Peimar | Recom | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.346%/°C | -0.284%/°C | +0.062 |
| Bifacial Share | 2 (40%) | 23 (38%) | +2 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Peimar skews to higher efficiency: 40% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Peimar | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (40.0%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 1 (20.0%) | 5 (8.2%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (40.0%) | 20 (32.8%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 36 (59.0%) |


## Power distribution

Recom offers more 600W+ panels (36% of lineup)


| Power band | Peimar | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (40.0%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 1 (20.0%) | 34 (55.7%) |
| 500-599W | 2 (40.0%) | 5 (8.2%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 12 (19.7%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 10 (16.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (60%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (84%)


| Technology | Peimar | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 3 (60.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 2 (40.0%) | 51 (83.6%) |
| HJT | 0 | 5 (8.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 5 (8.2%) |


## Top panels, Peimar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [OR10H595MNDB](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-or10h595mndb) | 595 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SA500M (FB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sa500m-fb) | 500 | 21.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [OR10H450MNDB (FB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-or10h450mndb-fb) | 450 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SG330P](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sg330p) | 330 | 17.0 | -0.430 | Polycrystalline |
| 5 | [SG325P](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sg325p) | 325 | 16.7 | -0.430 | Polycrystalline |


## Top panels, Recom


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RCM-730-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-730-8dbnm) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RCM-725-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-725-8dbnm) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RCM-720-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RCM-715-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-715-8dbnm) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RCM-715-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-715-8nm) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RCM-710-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-710-8dbnm) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RCM-710-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-710-8nm) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RCM-705-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-705-8dbnm) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RCM-705-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-705-8nm) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RCM-700-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-700-8nm) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [Peimar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/peimar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-recom)
- [Peimar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/peimar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-recom)
- [Peimar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/peimar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-recom)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/peimar-vs-recom

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.