--- title: "Jinergy JKL132-B-505MH 505W Solar Panel - Specs & Review | ComparePV" description: "Jinergy JKL132-B-505MH 505W solar panel. Specs: 21.28% efficiency, Monocrystalline cells, dimensions, warranty and temperature coefficient." source: "https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-505mh" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # Jinergy JKL132-B-505MH Efficiency leader, weak in heat 706 panels in the segment PERC 500-550 W ## Identity - **Manufacturer:** Jinergy - **Model:** JKL132-B-505MH - **Series:** MO series (PERC Mono All Black Single Glass Module) - **Rated power:** 505 W - **Cell technology:** PERC ## How it compares Compared against segment PERC 500-550 W (706 panels). | Measure | This panel | Segment median | Standing | Rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Power (Wp) | 505 W | 535 W | Weak - bottom 11% | | | Module efficiency | 21.28% | 20.90% | Strong - top 6% | 8,795 | | Power density | 212.7 | 209.0 | Strong - top 6% | 8,757 | | Temperature coefficient | -0.360 | -0.350 | Weak - bottom 9% | 12,345 | | Weight (kg) | 26.0 kg | 28.4 kg | Typical | | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | Typical | 21 | ### Full peer table | Measure | This panel | Segment median | Standing | Rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 21.28% | 20.90% | Strong - top 6% | 8,795 | | Power density | 212.7 | 209.0 | Strong - top 6% | 8,757 | | Temperature coefficient | -0.360 | -0.350 | Weak - bottom 9% | 12,345 | | Weight per kWp | 51.5 | 53.0 | Typical | 4,854 | | Performance warranty | 30 yrs | 30 yrs | Typical | 21 | ### Strengths - **21.28% module efficiency** - Top 6% of the PERC 500-550 W segment, against a median of 20.90%. Ranked 8,795th in the whole database. - **212.7 watts per square metre** - Top 6% of the PERC 500-550 W segment, against a median of 209.0. Ranked 8,757th in the whole database. ### Watch out for - **-0.360 %/°C temperature coefficient** - Bottom 9% of the PERC 500-550 W segment, against a median of -0.350. Ranked 12,345th in the whole database. - **Best for:** Residential and commercial. - **Not ideal for:** Hot climates. ## Specification ### Electrical - **Rated power (Pmax):** 505 W - **Efficiency:** 21.28 % - **Voltage at Pmax (Vmp):** 38.07 V - **Current at Pmax (Imp):** 13.28 A - **Open-circuit voltage (Voc):** 45.85 V - **Short-circuit current (Isc):** 14.01 A - **Max system voltage:** 1500 V ### Temperature - **Temperature coefficient of Pmax:** -0.360 %/degC - **Temperature coefficient of Voc:** -0.290 %/degC - **Temperature coefficient of Isc:** 0.050 %/degC - **NOCT:** 45 degC ### Cell and construction - **Cell type:** Monocrystalline - **Cell technology:** PERC - **Cell count:** 132 ### Physical - **Length:** 2094 mm - **Width:** 1134 mm - **Thickness:** 30 mm - **Weight:** 26.0 kg - **Area:** 2.37 m2 - **Power density:** 212.7 Wp/m2 ### Warranty and degradation - **Product warranty:** 15 years - **Performance warranty:** 30 years - **Annual degradation:** 0.55 % - **Output after 30 years:** 419 W ## Rank in the whole catalogue | Measure | Position | | --- | --- | | Efficiency | 8795 of 14005 | | Power density | 8757 of 14005 | | Temperature coefficient | 12345 of 14005 | | Weight | 4854 of 14005 | | Warranty | 21 of 14005 | ## Pros - **All Black aesthetics without compromise** - A fully uniform black surface — cells, backsheet, and frame in matching color — eliminates the visual grid effect on the roof plane. Critical for residential installations on dark tiles or metal roofing where facade aesthetics are a client requirement, not merely an option. - **30-year linear power warranty** - The manufacturer provides a linear power degradation warranty for 30 years — a horizon exceeding the 25-year standard found on comparable models (e.g., Trina Solar Vertex Backsheet). The longer term directly supports LCOE modeling for typical prosumer investments calculated over a 25–30-year operational period. - **Efficiency >21% in the mono PERC class** - Peak efficiency of 21.51% positions the MO series above the comparable Trina Solar Vertex Backsheet (21.2%), delivering higher yield from the same roof footprint without having to adopt more expensive N-type technologies in space-constrained installations. - **Lightweight single glass build — lower BoS costs** - Glass-backsheet construction results in lower per-module weight compared to glass-glass bifacial modules, simplifying roof structure selection and potentially reducing BoS costs. Single glass technology is well understood by installers and does not require specialized clamps or intermediate reinforcements. ## Cons - **Not BNEF Tier-1 bankable** - Jinergy does not appear on the current BNEF Tier-1 bankable list (tier\_1\_bankable: false in manufacturer data, confirmed absent from Q4 2025 and Q1 2026 BNEF reports). For installations financed by independent commercial banks (projects >10 MW), non-bankable status can block financing or raise the cost of capital; peers such as JA Solar and Trina Solar meet this requirement. - **Efficiency gap vs. top peer comparables** - Peak efficiency of 21.51% is approximately 1.5 percentage points below the JA Solar JAM60S40 LR (23%) and ~1.42 pp below the Sunlike SKT490~510M12-108D4 (22.93%). At the same nominal 510 Wp output, the Jinergy module occupies a larger footprint per kWp, limiting installation density on roof planes with limited available area. - **PERC technology: higher LID and Tc vs. N-type** - P-type PERC cells exhibit LID of 1–3% within the first hours of sun exposure (vs. \<0.5% for N-type TOPCon/HJT cells). The typical PERC temperature coefficient of approximately -0.35%/°C compares unfavorably to TOPCon's ~-0.30%/°C — a difference that becomes measurable in annual yield under Central European summer conditions with module temperatures exceeding 50°C. ## About this series The Jinergy MO (PERC Mono All Black Single Glass) series is a range of roof-mounted modules where both performance and consistent aesthetics are crucial. The use of PERC technology on monocrystalline cells ensures stable operation in real-world conditions, while the all-black design makes it easy to integrate the installation into modern architecture without the unsightly "grid" effect often seen on roofs. In practice, you get a **uniform, black surface** that looks good on graphite-colored tiles and metal roofing, as well as a **single-glass construction** - which is advantageous where a classic, proven panel design is important. This is a good choice for investors who want to minimize compromises between aesthetics and efficiency, while also expecting **high-quality workmanship** and predictable performance. The MO series is suitable for residential and small commercial installations, particularly where the design requires **an aesthetically pleasing building facade** and an organized arrangement of modules. ## Notable figures - Efficiency of 21.3% matches the \*\*PERC 500-550W\*\* median - 212.7 W/m² power density - 3.7 W/m² more than \*\*PERC 500-550W\*\* median (209.0 W/m²), more power per roof area - Temperature coefficient of -0.36%/°C matches the \*\*PERC 500-550W\*\* median - 26.0 kg weight - 2.4 kg lighter than \*\*PERC 500-550W\*\* median (28.4 kg), reducing installation effort - In the top 63% for efficiency among all PERC panels ## Questions ### How does the Jinergy MO series look on a dark sloped roof? The Jinergy MO series features a full all-black design — black frame, black backsheet, and black cells create a uniform surface with no silver accents. On dark roof tiles or dark metal roofing, the array blends into the roof surface instead of contrasting with it. It's a solid choice for homeowners who want a cohesive aesthetic without the grid-on-a-roof effect on a visible roof section. ### What warranty does the Jinergy MO series come with and what does it cover? The manufacturer provides a 15-year product warranty covering manufacturing defects and workmanship, plus a 30-year linear power output warranty. This means the module should maintain the manufacturer's declared degradation rate over three decades of operation. Keep your invoice and installation documentation — they are required for any warranty claim filed with the distributor or importer in your market. ### What is PERC technology and how does it affect the daily output of Jinergy MO panels? PERC (Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell) is a modification to standard monocrystalline cells that adds a passivation layer to the rear side of the cell, improving electron collection and reducing recombination losses. In practice, this translates into higher yields under overcast conditions and during morning and evening hours. MO series panels therefore produce energy effectively across a longer portion of the solar day compared to conventional mono cells without PERC. ### Why does the Jinergy MO series use single glass construction instead of a double-glass build? Single glass construction — front glass plus rear backsheet — is a proven, classic module design. It is lighter than double glass, which reduces roof structure load and simplifies installation on standard mounting systems. Because the MO series is not a bifacial module, a rear glass pane would add no energy gain from reflected irradiance. For residential and small commercial installations, single glass construction is entirely adequate. ### Is Jinergy a reliable manufacturer — how is the brand rated in the industry? Jinergy (formerly TBEA SunOasis) is a Chinese manufacturer with a vertically integrated silicon supply chain that has been active in European markets for several years. The brand does not appear on Bloomberg NEF's official Tier 1 list, but it holds required IEC certifications and its modules have been used in commercial projects across Europe. Before purchasing, verify who handles warranty claims in your local market, as the practical value of the warranty depends on distributor or importer strength. ### How many Jinergy MO 510 Wp panels do I need to build a roughly 10 kWp system? At a peak power of 510 Wp per module, you need approximately 20 panels to reach a 10.2 kWp system. That is a typical size for a single-family home with annual consumption above 5,000 kWh or for a prosumer running a heat pump. The exact panel count depends on available roof area, roof orientation, and inverter configuration — an individual system design is recommended before finalizing the order. ## Datasheet [Manufacturer datasheet (PDF)](https://comparepv.com/datasheets/mo-jkl132-b-490-510-mh-69e3d8783f6d.pdf) ## Alternatives | Panel | Power | How it differs | | --- | --- | --- | | [Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M](https://comparepv.com/panel/longi-lr7-54hjd-510m) | 510 W | Cooler, lighter, +3.7 pp | | [AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a495-mce54mw) | 495 W | Cooler, lighter, +3.5 pp | | [Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-505M](https://comparepv.com/panel/longi-lr7-54hjd-505m) | 505 W | Cooler, lighter, +3.4 pp | | [Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-555M](https://comparepv.com/panel/longi-lr7-60hvh-555m) | 555 W | +50 W, cooler, +3.3 pp | | [AIKO AIKO-A490-MCE54Mw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a490-mce54mw) | 490 W | Cooler, lighter, +3.2 pp | | [Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M](https://comparepv.com/panel/longi-lr7-54hjd-500m) | 500 W | Cooler, lighter, +3.2 pp | | [Jinergy JKL132-B-490MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-490mh) | 490 W | -15 W, -0.5 pp | | [Jinergy JKL132-B-495MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-495mh) | 495 W | -10 W, -0.5 pp | | [Jinergy JKL132-B-500MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-500mh) | 500 W | -0.2 pp | | [Jinergy JKL132-B-510MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-510mh) | 510 W | +0.2 pp | | [Gamko New Energy GKA120N-PRO-590W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka120n-pro-590w) | 590 W | +85 W, cooler, +2.5 pp | | [Gamko New Energy GKA120N-PRO-585W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka120n-pro-585w) | 585 W | +80 W, cooler, +2.3 pp | | [Bisol BGO 580](https://comparepv.com/panel/bisol-bgo-580) | 580 W | +75 W, cooler, +2.2 pp | | [Gamko New Energy GKA120N-PRO-580W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gamko-new-energy-gka120n-pro-580w) | 580 W | +75 W, cooler, +2.1 pp | --- Source: https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-505mh Not in this file, on the page: a thirty-year output simulator and alternatives filtered by how closely they match these dimensions.