--- title: "HT-SAAE HT72-18X-560W 560W Solar Panel - Specs & Review | ComparePV" description: "HT-SAAE HT72-18X-560W 560W solar panel. Specs: 21.70% efficiency, Monocrystalline cells, dimensions, warranty and temperature coefficient." source: "https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht72-18x-560w-1" updated: 2026-09-11 --- # HT-SAAE HT72-18X-560W Middle of its segment, short guarantee 1,017 panels in the segment TOPCon 550-600 W ## Identity - **Manufacturer:** HT-SAAE - **Model:** HT72-18X-560W - **Series:** HT72-18X - **Rated power:** 560 W - **Cell technology:** TOPCon ## How it compares Compared against segment TOPCon 550-600 W (1017 panels). | Measure | This panel | Segment median | Standing | Rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Power (Wp) | 560 W | 580 W | Weak - bottom 10% | | | Module efficiency | 21.70% | 22.44% | Weak - bottom 13% | 7,421 | | Power density | 216.7 | 224.4 | Weak - bottom 10% | 7,538 | | Temperature coefficient | -0.330 | -0.290 | Weak - bottom 7% | 8,545 | | Weight (kg) | 28.5 kg | 31.2 kg | Typical | | | Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs | Weak - bottom 5% | 9,798 | ### Full peer table | Measure | This panel | Segment median | Standing | Rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Module efficiency | 21.70% | 22.44% | Weak - bottom 13% | 7,421 | | Power density | 216.7 | 224.4 | Weak - bottom 10% | 7,538 | | Temperature coefficient | -0.330 | -0.290 | Weak - bottom 7% | 8,545 | | Weight per kWp | 50.9 | 53.8 | Typical | 4,264 | | Performance warranty | 25 yrs | 30 yrs | Weak - bottom 5% | 9,798 | ### Watch out for - **25 year performance warranty** - Bottom 5% of the TOPCon 550-600 W segment, against a median of 30 yrs. Ranked 9,798th in the whole database. - **-0.330 %/°C temperature coefficient** - Bottom 7% of the TOPCon 550-600 W segment, against a median of -0.290. Ranked 8,545th in the whole database. - **216.7 watts per square metre** - Bottom 10% of the TOPCon 550-600 W segment, against a median of 224.4. Ranked 7,538th in the whole database. - **Best for:** Commercial, utility-scale and shaded-installations. - **Not ideal for:** Owners who want a long output guarantee, hot climates and roofs where every square metre has to count. ## Specification ### Electrical - **Rated power (Pmax):** 560 W - **Efficiency:** 21.70 % - **Voltage at Pmax (Vmp):** 42.25 V - **Current at Pmax (Imp):** 13.27 A - **Open-circuit voltage (Voc):** 50.10 V - **Short-circuit current (Isc):** 14.14 A - **Max system voltage:** 1500 V ### Temperature - **Temperature coefficient of Pmax:** -0.330 %/degC - **Temperature coefficient of Voc:** -0.260 %/degC - **Temperature coefficient of Isc:** 0.042 %/degC ### Cell and construction - **Cell type:** Monocrystalline - **Cell technology:** TOPCon - **Cell count:** 144 ### Physical - **Length:** 2279 mm - **Width:** 1134 mm - **Thickness:** 35 mm - **Weight:** 28.5 kg - **Area:** 2.58 m2 - **Power density:** 216.7 Wp/m2 ### Warranty and degradation - **Product warranty:** 25 years - **Performance warranty:** 25 years - **Output guaranteed at end of warranty:** 83.1 % - **First-year degradation:** 2.50 % - **Annual degradation:** 0.60 % - **Output after 30 years:** 449 W ## Rank in the whole catalogue | Measure | Position | | --- | --- | | Efficiency | 7421 of 14005 | | Power density | 7538 of 14005 | | Temperature coefficient | 8545 of 14005 | | Weight | 4264 of 14005 | | Warranty | 9798 of 14005 | ## Pros - **PVEL Top Performer 2024 – All 7 Test Sequences** - The series passed all seven PVEL reliability test sequences (PV Top Performers List 2024): thermal cycling, damp heat, mechanical stress, hail sequence, PID, LID+LETID, and PAN performance. This is one of the most rigorous industry benchmarks — the vast majority of manufacturers fail to achieve a clean sweep across all seven tests. - **Aerospace Heritage and Manufacturing Quality** - HT-SAAE traces its origins to China's space program (satellites since 1960). Full automation of production lines eliminates human error, and quality control standards inherited from the aerospace industry translate into above-average parameter uniformity across production batches. - **Peak Efficiency of 21.7% – Top-Tier Competitive** - The highest-output variant of the series achieves 21.7% efficiency, matching direct competitors such as the Exiom EX560M (21.7%) and Premier Energies 144HC (21.67%). The entry-level variant (20.9%) is the only area of gap relative to the DAH Solar DHM-T72X10/BF/FS (21.72%), which is, however, a bifacial module. - **Multi-Busbar + Half-Cut M10 – Reduced Hot-Spot Risk** - The 144 half-cut cell configuration (182 mm / M10) combined with multi-busbar technology shortens electron current paths, reduces series resistance, and lowers thermal stress at interconnection points. The practical result is improved tolerance to partial shading and a reduced risk of hot-spot formation over the long term. - **Enhanced PID Resistance** - The series is certified for resistance to potential-induced degradation (PID), which is critical for 1500 V DC systems typical of commercial and utility-scale PV installations — the HT72-18X system voltage is rated at exactly 1500 V DC (IEC). ## Cons - **PERC Technology – Not TOPCon** - In 2025–2026, the utility-scale market is transitioning to N-type cells (TOPCon, HJT). PERC exhibits an annual degradation rate of 0.6–0.8%, whereas TOPCon achieves 0.4–0.5% (source: 2024–2025 industry benchmarks). Over a 25-year investment horizon, the difference in cumulative energy yield can amount to 3–6 percentage points of residual power output. - **Monofacial Module – No Bifacial Option** - The HT72-18X series is monofacial, whereas the direct competitor DAH Solar DHM-T72X10/BF/FS offers a bifacial variant at a comparable front-side efficiency (21.72%). On typical ground-mounted installations with light-colored surfaces, bifaciality delivers a real-world 5–15% additional annual energy yield from albedo gain. ## About this series The HT72-18X series is based on **M10 monocrystalline cells** with a 182 mm side, which allows for achieving high efficiency while reducing installation and logistics costs. The use of **advanced Multi-Busbar technology** significantly shortens the electron flow path, which not only increases power output but also improves the module's reliability by reducing the risk of hot spots. These panels effectively solve the problem of limited installation space, offering high energy yields even with fewer units. Thanks to the **use of half-cut cells**, the HT72-18X series demonstrates excellent shading tolerance, making it an ideal choice for demanding commercial installations and large-scale photovoltaic farms. What sets these modules apart from the competition is their design adapted for operation in harsh environments, characterized by **increased resistance to potential-induced degradation (PID)** and high mechanical resistance to wind pressure and snow loads. Investing in this series ensures long-term performance, backed by the manufacturer's experience in creating components for the space sector, which translates into a stable return on investment in the Polish climate. ## Notable figures - Module efficiency of 21.7% is 0.7pp below average for \*\*TOPCon 550-600W\*\* panels (median: 22.4%) - Power density of 216.7 W/m² is 7.7 W/m² below \*\*TOPCon 550-600W\*\* median (224.4 W/m²) - needs more roof space - -0.33%/°C temperature coefficient - 0.04pp worse than \*\*TOPCon 550-600W\*\* median (-0.29%/°C), expect higher hot weather losses - Weight of 28.5 kg (2.7 kg below \*\*TOPCon 550-600W\*\* median of 31.2 kg) allows easier transport and roof mounting - Ranked #7421 out of 14005 panels for efficiency in the database ## Questions ### What makes the Multi-Busbar technology in the HT72-18X series stand out, and does it actually increase power output? The Multi-Busbar (MBB) design in the HT72-18X series places multiple thin conductive strips across each M10 monocrystalline PERC cell (182 mm). This shortens the current path, reducing resistive losses and the risk of hot spots. In practice, it delivers higher output power — up to 560 W per module — and improves long-term cell reliability compared to conventional 4–6 busbar panels. ### How does the half-cut cell design affect HT72-18X performance when a chimney or antenna partially shades the panel? Half-cut cells split each PERC cell into two smaller units, halving the power loss in any shaded row. The HT72-18X uses 144 half-cut cells wired as two independent electrical circuits. Even when part of the module is shaded by a chimney, antenna, or tree branch, the unshaded circuit continues operating at full capacity — significantly improving annual energy yield on demanding rooftop installations. ### What warranty does HT-SAAE provide on the HT72-18X series and what exactly does it cover? HT-SAAE backs the HT72-18X series with a 25-year product warranty covering material and manufacturing defects, alongside a 25-year linear power warranty guaranteeing at least 83.1% of rated power output at the end of the warranty period. This is consistent with Tier 1 manufacturer standards and provides a reliable basis for calculating return on investment. ### Will HT-SAAE HT72-18X panels perform reliably in harsh conditions — frost, heavy snow, and strong winds? Yes, the HT72-18X series is engineered for demanding climates. The modules operate across a -40°C to +85°C temperature range, are rated for high wind and snow mechanical loads, and feature enhanced resistance to potential-induced degradation (PID). As a Tier 1 manufacturer with a background in aerospace component production, HT-SAAE delivers consistent durability in variable climates. ### Is the HT72-18X a monofacial or bifacial module, and what does that mean when choosing an installation site? The HT72-18X is a monofacial module, meaning power is generated solely from the front-side PERC cells. Unlike bifacial panels, it does not require a high-albedo ground surface (such as light gravel or concrete) or elevated racking to capture rear-side irradiance. This makes it simpler to install and more cost-effective for standard rooftop and ground-mount systems without additional design requirements. ### Are HT72-18X panels rated at 560 W suitable for large commercial rooftops and utility-scale solar farms? Yes, the HT72-18X series — delivering up to 560 W per module at up to 21.7% module efficiency — is designed for commercial and utility-scale PV projects. The M10 cell format (182 mm) reduces module count and balance-of-system (BoS) costs per MW of installed capacity. At 2279×1134×35 mm and 28.5 kg, the modules are well-suited for large-scale logistics and installation workflows. ## Datasheet [Manufacturer datasheet (PDF)](https://comparepv.com/datasheets/1142230498632ac158bcbb1-e08d0a4bbe97.pdf) ## Alternatives | Panel | Power | How it differs | | --- | --- | --- | | [Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M](https://comparepv.com/panel/longi-lr7-54hjd-510m) | 510 W | -50 W, cooler, +3.3 pp | | [Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-560M](https://comparepv.com/panel/longi-lr7-60hvh-560m) | 560 W | Cooler, +3.1 pp, +5 yr warranty | | [Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-555M](https://comparepv.com/panel/longi-lr7-60hvh-555m) | 555 W | Cooler, +2.9 pp, +5 yr warranty | | [Longi Solar LR7-60HVHL-550M](https://comparepv.com/panel/longi-lr7-60hvhl-550m) | 550 W | Cooler, lighter, +2.7 pp | | [JA Solar JAT60S40-540/LR](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jat60s40-540-lr) | 540 W | Cooler, lighter, +2.7 pp | | [Gokin GK-5-60HG-540M](https://comparepv.com/panel/gokin-gk-5-60hg-540m) | 540 W | Cooler, lighter, +2.7 pp | | [Jinko Solar JKM545-54QL6-DV-F1-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm545-54ql6-dv-f1-eu) | 545 W | Cooler, +2.6 pp, +5 yr warranty | | [HT-SAAE HT40-18X(ND)-310W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht40-18x-nd-310w) | 310 W | -250 W, heavier, -9.6 pp | | [HT-SAAE HT40-18X(ND)-F-310W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht40-18x-nd-f-310w) | 310 W | -250 W, -9.7 pp, +5 yr warranty | | [HT-SAAE HT40-18X(ND)-315W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht40-18x-nd-315w) | 315 W | -245 W, heavier, -9.4 pp | | [HT-SAAE HT40-18X(ND)-F-315W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht40-18x-nd-f-315w) | 315 W | -245 W, -9.5 pp, +5 yr warranty | | [HT-SAAE HT40-18X(ND)-320W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht40-18x-nd-320w) | 320 W | -240 W, heavier, -9.2 pp | | [HT-SAAE HT40-18X(ND)-F-320W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht40-18x-nd-f-320w) | 320 W | -240 W, -9.3 pp, +5 yr warranty | | [HT-SAAE HT40-18X(ND)-325W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht40-18x-nd-325w) | 325 W | -235 W, heavier, -9.0 pp | | [HT-SAAE HT40-18X(ND)-F-325W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht40-18x-nd-f-325w) | 325 W | -235 W, -9.1 pp, +5 yr warranty | | [HT-SAAE HT40-18X(ND)-330W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht40-18x-nd-330w) | 330 W | -230 W, heavier, -8.8 pp | | [AIKO AIKO-A650-MAE72Mw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a650-mae72mw) | 650 W | +90 W, cooler, +3.5 pp | --- Source: https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht72-18x-560w-1 Not in this file, on the page: a thirty-year output simulator and alternatives filtered by how closely they match these dimensions.