---
title: "Ocean Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Ocean Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ocean-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Ocean Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 36 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Ocean Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2012 | 1997 |
| Employees | 200+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 1 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.oceansolar.cn](http://www.oceansolar.cn) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Ocean Solar is a high-tech enterprise specializing in the production of high-efficiency monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar modules. They serve domestic and overseas installers, distributors, and factories engaged in off-grid and on-grid solar energy systems. The company is committed to providing customers with...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Ocean Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 36 | 340 | +304 |
| Max Power | 750 W | 760 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 596 W | 520 W | +76 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Ocean Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.20% | 24.80% | +0.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.06% | 21.71% | +1.34 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Ocean Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.002 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Ocean Solar skews to higher efficiency: 58% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Ocean Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (5.6%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 13 (36.1%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 21 (58.3%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |


## Power distribution

Ocean Solar offers more 600W+ panels (58% of lineup)


| Power band | Ocean Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 7 (19.4%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 8 (22.2%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 15 (41.7%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 6 (16.7%) | 44 (12.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Ocean Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 36 (100.0%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Ocean Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AOX-132G12HC750W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12hc750w) | 750 | 24.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AOX-132G12HC740W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12hc740w) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AOX-132G12HC730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12hc730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AOX-132G12HC720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12hc720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AOX-132G12HC710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12hc710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AOX-132G12HC700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12hc700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AOX-132G12RHC650W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12rhc650w) | 650 | 24.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AOX-132G12RHC645W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12rhc645w) | 645 | 23.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AOX-132G12RHC640W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12rhc640w) | 640 | 23.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AOX-132G12RHC635W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ocean-solar-aox-132g12rhc635w) | 635 | 23.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Ocean Solar is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, founded in 2012. The company operates a fully automated production line and a second facility in Ma'anshan, Anhui Province, with a reported annual module production capacity of around 1 GW. Cumulative exports have surpassed 2 GW across more than 30 countries. Ocean Solar does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability list, which places it firmly in the value-oriented segment of the market - suited to buyers who prioritize unit cost over institutional track record. Trina Solar, also based in Changzhou but founded in 1997, operates on an entirely different scale. By end-2024 the company's module production capacity reached approximately 120 GW, and annual shipments exceeded 65 GW in 2023 according to pv-magazine. Trina has earned BloombergNEF Tier 1 status eight consecutive times and achieved a perfect 100% bankability score in 2025 - one of only a handful of manufacturers to do so. On the measure of institutional footprint and financier confidence, Trina Solar is in a different league.

Ocean Solar's catalog covers both PERC and N-type TOPCon modules ranging from roughly 400 W to 730 W, including monofacial and bifacial variants. The company also offers OEM and ODM services, making it a natural fit for smaller installers or distributors seeking private-label products at competitive prices. It is best positioned for residential rooftop projects where budget constraints outweigh brand recognition requirements. Trina Solar has fully pivoted to N-type i-TOPCon technology through its Vertex N series, with efficiency up to 24.5% and module output reaching 760 W. The product range spans residential rooftop, commercial-and-industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount applications. Manufacturing spread across China, Vietnam, Thailand, and a 5 GW facility in Wilmer, Texas helps Trina serve diverse regulatory and sourcing requirements across international markets.

For most international buyers - especially those seeking project finance, insurance, or long-term performance assurance - Trina Solar is the stronger default choice. Its Tier 1 bankability, 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer, and mature global supply chain set it clearly apart from Ocean Solar. Ocean Solar can be a reasonable option for cost-driven residential installs or OEM integrators comfortable with a less widely recognized brand, but it cannot currently match Trina Solar on verified quality benchmarks, institutional credibility, or breadth of product portfolio.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Ocean Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ocean-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Ocean Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ocean-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Ocean Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ocean-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ocean-solar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.