---
title: "Neo Solar Power vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Neo Solar Power vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/neo-solar-power-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Neo Solar Power vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 30 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Neo Solar Power leans bifacial (67% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Neo Solar Power | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Taiwan | China |
| Headquarters | Hsinchu | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2005 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.nsp.com](https://www.nsp.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Neo Solar Power | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 30 | 340 | +310 |
| Max Power | 715 W | 760 W | +45 W |
| Avg Power | 535 W | 520 W | +15 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Neo Solar Power | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.03% | 24.80% | +1.77 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.79% | 21.71% | +0.08 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Neo Solar Power | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.320%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.018 |
| Bifacial Share | 20 (67%) | 145 (43%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.5 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +0.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Neo Solar Power | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (3.3%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 4 (13.3%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 11 (36.7%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 12 (40.0%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (6.7%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Neo Solar Power | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (3.3%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 14 (46.7%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (16.7%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 6 (20.0%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 4 (13.3%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (67%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Neo Solar Power | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 20 (66.7%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 10 (33.3%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Neo Solar Power


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [NESE 715-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-715-66thb-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NESE 710-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-710-66thb-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [NESE 705-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-705-66thb-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [NESE 700-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-700-66thb-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NESE 695-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-695-66thb-g12) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [NESE 675-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-675-66mht-g12) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [NESE 670-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-670-66mht-g12) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NESE 665-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-665-66mht-g12) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NESE 660-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-660-66mht-g12) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NESE 655-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-655-66mht-g12) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Neo Solar Power (NSP), headquartered in Hsinchu Science Park, Taiwan, was founded in December 2005 by former executives from TSMC and the Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI). In 2018 it merged with Gintech Energy and Solartech Energy to form United Renewable Energy Co., Ltd. (UREC), which continues to operate under the NSP brand. Annual production capacity stands at roughly 2.6 GW of solar cells and 800 MW of modules as of 2023, placing it well below the leading global tier. Trina Solar, founded in December 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China by Gao Jifan, operates at an entirely different scale: module capacity reached 95 GW in 2023, with a target of 120 GW by end-2025 and cumulative global shipments surpassing 225 GW. Trina holds a consistent BloombergNEF Tier 1 rating and has earned PVEL Top Performer recognition for 11 consecutive years. By any measure of institutional footprint, Trina Solar is the substantially larger and more bankable entity.

NSP's current product focus centers on N-type TOPCon cells and modules under the Glory series, with confirmed mass-production efficiencies above 24%. The company has been expanding into energy storage integration and downstream project development, which narrows its module-market visibility internationally. Trina Solar, by contrast, maintains a full product stack: the Vertex S+ G3 TOPCon series addresses residential and commercial rooftop installations, while the large-format Vertex N and NEG-series modules - including the NEG21 at up to 760 W and 24.5% efficiency - serve utility-scale ground-mount projects. Distribution spans more than 160 countries, supported by an established network of financing partners and independent testing records.

For most international buyers, Trina Solar is the lower-risk default. Its Tier 1 bankability, deep field history, and broad distribution infrastructure reduce financing, supply-chain, and warranty-servicing risk simultaneously. NSP remains a credible alternative for buyers who specifically value a non-mainland-Chinese manufacturer - Taiwan's semiconductor-rooted manufacturing culture is a genuine differentiator - but the brand's smaller scale and limited global distribution warrant careful due diligence on long-term warranty support before committing to a significant deployment.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Neo Solar Power vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/neo-solar-power-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Neo Solar Power vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/neo-solar-power-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Neo Solar Power vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/neo-solar-power-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/neo-solar-power-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.