---
title: "Neo Solar Power vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Neo Solar Power vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/neo-solar-power-vs-q-cells"
---

# Neo Solar Power vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 30 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Neo Solar Power leans bifacial (67% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Neo Solar Power | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Taiwan | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Hsinchu | Seoul |
| Founded | 2005 | 1999 |
| Employees |  | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://www.nsp.com](https://www.nsp.com) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Neo Solar Power | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 30 | 89 | +59 |
| Max Power | 715 W | 675 W | +40 W |
| Avg Power | 535 W | 468 W | +67 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Neo Solar Power | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.03% | 23.20% | +0.17 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.79% | 21.21% | +0.58 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Neo Solar Power | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.320%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.005 |
| Bifacial Share | 20 (67%) | 35 (39%) | +27 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.5 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +0.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Neo Solar Power skews to higher efficiency: 7% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Neo Solar Power | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (3.3%) | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 4 (13.3%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 11 (36.7%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 12 (40.0%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (6.7%) | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

Neo Solar Power offers more 600W+ panels (33% of lineup)


| Power band | Neo Solar Power | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (3.3%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 14 (46.7%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (16.7%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 6 (20.0%) | 17 (19.1%) |
| 700W+ | 4 (13.3%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (67%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Neo Solar Power | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 20 (66.7%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| PERC | 10 (33.3%) | 38 (42.7%) |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Top panels, Neo Solar Power


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [NESE 715-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-715-66thb-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NESE 710-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-710-66thb-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [NESE 705-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-705-66thb-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [NESE 700-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-700-66thb-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NESE 695-66THB-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-695-66thb-g12) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [NESE 675-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-675-66mht-g12) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [NESE 670-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-670-66mht-g12) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NESE 665-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-665-66mht-g12) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NESE 660-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-660-66mht-g12) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NESE 655-66MHT-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/neo-solar-power-nese-655-66mht-g12) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Neo Solar Power (NSP) was founded in 2005 and is headquartered in Hsinchu, Taiwan. In 2018, NSP merged with Gintech Energy and Solartech Energy to form United Renewable Energy (URE), though the Neo Solar Power brand name has persisted in several markets. At its peak NSP was the largest solar cell producer in Taiwan by capacity, but its global footprint today is modest relative to the Chinese top-tier producers and larger Korean-backed rivals. Hanwha Q CELLS traces its roots to the German Q-Cells AG, founded in 1999 and acquired by South Korea's Hanwha Group in 2012. Q CELLS holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and operates what is reported to be the largest solar manufacturing facility in the Western Hemisphere, in Dalton, Georgia, giving it considerably stronger institutional standing - particularly in the North American market.

NSP/URE built its reputation on high-efficiency cell manufacturing, offering p-type PERC products under its Black 21 line and n-type heterojunction cells under the Hello 22 designation, with ongoing development into TOPCon. Its panels are generally positioned toward regional markets in Asia and select project developers elsewhere. Q CELLS, by contrast, addresses a broad spectrum from premium residential rooftops to commercial and utility-scale ground mounts. Its flagship lines are built around the proprietary Q.ANTUM NEO platform - a TOPCon-based technology - delivering module efficiencies reaching roughly 22.5%. In 2025, Q CELLS also secured IEC and UL certification for a perovskite-silicon tandem module at 28.6% efficiency, signaling a clear push into next-generation territory.

For most buyers in 2025, particularly in North America or Europe, Q CELLS represents the stronger default choice. Its Tier 1 bankability, domestic US manufacturing, competitive pricing relative to premium rivals, and well-documented 25-year product warranties collectively reduce project risk. Neo Solar Power/URE remains a credible manufacturer with a solid technology heritage, but its lower global brand recognition and more limited distribution network put it at a disadvantage for buyers who depend on readily available installer networks and straightforward project financing.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/neo-solar-power \| Neo Solar Power manufacturer profile - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/supplier/22766/neo-solar-power-nsp/ \| Neo Solar Power NSP supplier profile - EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert review of Hanwha Q CELLS solar panels - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels \| Q CELLS solar panels review 2025 - EcoWatch \| review

\- https://renewablesnow.com/news/merger-of-taiwanese-solar-trio-to-close-on-oct-1-622557/ \| Merger of Taiwanese solar trio NSP, Gintech, Solartech - RenewablesNow \| article

Sources:

\- \[Neo Solar Power manufacturer profile - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/neo-solar-power)

\- \[Neo Solar Power NSP supplier profile - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/supplier/22766/neo-solar-power-nsp/)

\- \[Expert review of Hanwha Q CELLS solar panels - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Q CELLS solar panels review 2025 - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels)

\- \[Merger of Taiwanese solar trio NSP, Gintech, Solartech - RenewablesNow\](https://renewablesnow.com/news/merger-of-taiwanese-solar-trio-to-close-on-oct-1-622557/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Neo Solar Power vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/neo-solar-power-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Neo Solar Power vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/neo-solar-power-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Neo Solar Power vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/neo-solar-power-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/neo-solar-power-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.