---
title: "NeMo vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare NeMo vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/nemo-vs-trina-solar"
---

# NeMo vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | NeMo | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | China |
| Headquarters | Chemnitz | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2001 | 1997 |
| Employees | 100-500 |  |
| Annual capacity | 0.5-1 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.heckertsolar.com](https://www.heckertsolar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

NeMo is the flagship solar module product line of Heckert Solar GmbH, a German photovoltaic manufacturer founded in Chemnitz, Saxony. The company produces mono- and polycrystalline solar panels exclusively in Germany, across facilities in Chemnitz and Langenwetzendorf in Thuringia. With over 20 years of manufacturing...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | NeMo | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | NeMo | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | NeMo | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | NeMo | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | NeMo | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | NeMo | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

NeMo is the flagship module line of Heckert Solar GmbH, a German manufacturer founded in 2001 and headquartered in Chemnitz, Saxony, with production facilities in Chemnitz and Langenwetzendorf, Thuringia. All panels carry a genuine "Made in Germany" designation, and annual production capacity stands at approximately 800 MWp. Heckert Solar does not appear on the Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability list and has not been assessed in the PVEL Module Reliability Scorecard, which limits its suitability for large institutionally financed projects, though it is well regarded in the European premium residential segment. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, China, ranked third globally in 2024 with shipments of approximately 77 GW and cumulative deliveries exceeding 205 GW across more than 100 countries. It holds continuous Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status and carries a substantially stronger institutional footprint than Heckert Solar on the international stage.

The NeMo product family is built around mono-PERC cell technology in a glass-foil construction, with efficiency in the 20.3-20.8% range and peak output up to 405 Wp in the NeMo 4.2 series. Heckert Solar also produces Zeus modules with n-type TOPCon cells for buyers seeking higher performance, though at modest production volumes. The NeMo range is most competitive in residential rooftop and small-to-medium commercial applications; the company's limited scale makes it a less viable option for utility-grade procurement. Trina Solar covers all major market segments: the Vertex S+ G3 series addresses residential and C&I buyers with n-type i-TOPCon modules delivering up to 485 Wp and 24.3% efficiency, while the large-format Vertex line targets ground-mount utility projects. Select Vertex S+ models come with 30-year linear performance warranties and annual degradation rates as low as 0.35%, representing leading-edge long-term performance guarantees.

For buyers who prioritize European origin, a short and traceable supply chain, and the reputational value of "Made in Germany" quality assurance, NeMo is a credible premium choice for residential or small commercial installations - particularly in markets where end customers place a premium on manufacturing origin. For project developers, international buyers, or anyone requiring confirmed Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability, broad installer familiarity, and a technology portfolio spanning residential through utility scale, Trina Solar is the more versatile and broadly applicable default. The two brands ultimately serve different buyer profiles more than they compete directly with one another.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [NeMo vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/nemo-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [NeMo vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/nemo-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [NeMo vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/nemo-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/nemo-vs-trina-solar