---
title: "Navitas Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Navitas Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/navitas-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Navitas Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 8 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Navitas Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | India | China |
| Headquarters | Surat | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2013 | 1997 |
| Employees | 100-500 |  |
| Annual capacity | 3 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://navitassolar.in](https://navitassolar.in) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Navitas Solar (Navitas Green Solutions Pvt. Ltd.) is an Indian solar module manufacturer headquartered in Surat, Gujarat. Founded in 2013, the company specializes in mono PERC and TOPCon solar panels and has expanded its annual manufacturing capacity to approximately 3 GW. It markets itself as one of India's leading...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Navitas Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 8 | 340 | +332 |
| Max Power | 560 W | 760 W | +200 W |
| Avg Power | 542 W | 520 W | +22 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Navitas Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 21.67% | 24.80% | +3.13 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.00% | 21.71% | +0.72 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Navitas Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.360%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.058 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Navitas Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 4 (50.0%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 4 (50.0%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Navitas Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 500-599W | 8 (100.0%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Navitas Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 8 (100.0%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Navitas Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [NSM560-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/navitas-solar-nsm560-144) | 560 | 21.7 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NSM555-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/navitas-solar-nsm555-144) | 555 | 21.5 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [NSM550-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/navitas-solar-nsm550-144) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [NSM545-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/navitas-solar-nsm545-144) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NSM540-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/navitas-solar-nsm540-144) | 540 | 20.9 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [NSM535-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/navitas-solar-nsm535-144) | 535 | 20.7 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [NSM530-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/navitas-solar-nsm530-144) | 530 | 20.5 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NSM525-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/navitas-solar-nsm525-144) | 525 | 20.3 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Navitas Solar is an Indian solar module manufacturer founded in 2013 and headquartered in Surat, Gujarat. The company has scaled its annual module production capacity to approximately 3 GW and is pursuing backward integration into cell, wafer, and ingot manufacturing in Gujarat. As of mid-2026, Navitas has not been confirmed on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 bankability list, placing it in a different risk category from globally ranked peers when it comes to project finance and institutional procurement. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 1997 and based in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province. With annual production capacity of around 100 GW and cumulative global shipments exceeding 292 GW by mid-2025, Trina ranks among the largest solar manufacturers on earth. It has earned BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability recognition for the eighth consecutive time and achieved a 100% bankability score in BNEF's 2025 survey - a mark of near-universal institutional confidence. On the measure of global institutional footprint, Trina Solar holds a commanding advantage.

Navitas Solar's product range spans residential rooftop panels through utility-scale modules, covering power classes from 40 W up to 720 W. The company has transitioned its newer lines to n-type TOPCon bifacial technology alongside its established Mono PERC portfolio, and recently introduced the G12R series aimed at larger commercial and ground-mounted installations. Its primary market remains India, where it is active across both the rooftop and utility tender segments. Trina Solar's Vertex product family covers a wider spectrum: the Vertex S and Vertex S+ series (around 480-495 W) address residential and light commercial rooftops, while the Vertex N TOPCon Ultra line - exceeding 740 W - serves utility-scale farms and large C&I projects. Trina's latest TOPCon utility modules reach efficiencies of up to 24.5%, and flagship products carry 30-year performance warranties.

For an international buyer - particularly one in Europe, the Middle East, or any project requiring bank financing - Trina Solar is the more defensible default choice, given its verified Tier 1 status, global service infrastructure, and a deployment track record spanning hundreds of gigawatts. Navitas Solar is a credible and expanding option for buyers working primarily in India or those seeking domestic-content compliance under Indian supply policies. The two brands are not interchangeable on a global basis: Trina's institutional credibility and production scale give it a clear edge for cross-border or project-financed deployments.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Navitas Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/navitas-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Navitas Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/navitas-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Navitas Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/navitas-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/navitas-solar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.