---
title: "Mysolar USA vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Mysolar USA vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/mysolar-usa-vs-q-cells"
---

# Mysolar USA vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 15 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Mysolar USA leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Mysolar USA | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Seoul |
| Founded | 2010 | 1999 |
| Employees | 60 | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity | 3.2 GW/year | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://www.mamibot.com/](https://www.mamibot.com/) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Mysolar is a sub-brand of Mamibot, specializing in designing and manufacturing high-efficiency solar panels using state-of-the-art technology. The company aims to become a Tier 1 solar panel manufacturer, offering a wide range of modules for residential and commercial projects. Mysolar is committed to rewriting the...

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Mysolar USA | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 15 | 89 | +74 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 675 W | +45 W |
| Avg Power | 610 W | 468 W | +142 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Mysolar USA | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.17% | 23.20% | +0.03 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.42% | 21.21% | +1.21 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Mysolar USA | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.283%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.041 |
| Bifacial Share | 15 (100%) | 35 (39%) | +61 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +3.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Mysolar USA skews to higher efficiency: 13% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Mysolar USA | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 3 (20.0%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 10 (66.7%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (13.3%) | 2 (2.2%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 29 (32.6%) |


## Power distribution

Mysolar USA offers more 600W+ panels (67% of lineup)


| Power band | Mysolar USA | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 5 (33.3%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 600-699W | 4 (26.7%) | 17 (19.1%) |
| 700W+ | 6 (40.0%) | 0 |
| \<400W | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 11 (12.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (67%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Mysolar USA | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 10 (66.7%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| HJT | 5 (33.3%) | 0 |
| PERC | 0 | 38 (42.7%) |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Top panels, Mysolar USA


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MS720N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms720n-hjtgb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MS715N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms715n-hjtgb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MS710N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms710n-hjtgb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MS705N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms705n-hjtgb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MS700N-DHBG](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms700n-dhbg) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [MS700N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms700n-hjtgb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [MS695N-DHBG](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms695n-dhbg) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [MS690N-DHBG](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms690n-dhbg) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [MS685N-DHBG](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms685n-dhbg) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [MS680N-DHBG](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms680n-dhbg) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Mysolar USA is a solar panel brand under Mamibot, a Shanghai headquartered manufacturer that also registers a US entity in Wilmington, Delaware, with its module factory located in Jiading District, Shanghai. Mamibot itself was founded in 2013, initially as a home appliance and robotics company, and Mysolar operates as a newer solar module offshoot rather than an established standalone panel maker. The brand markets itself as aspiring to Tier 1 status, explicitly describing its positioning as "tier 1 brand quality with tier 2 pricing," which indicates it has not yet secured the independent BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability listing that more established manufacturers hold. Q-Cells, formally Hanwha Qcells, is a South Korean owned, US headquartered manufacturer with deep roots dating to a German solar cell maker founded in 1999 and later acquired by Hanwha Group. It holds confirmed Bloomberg Tier 1 bankable manufacturer status and operates large scale US manufacturing in Georgia, including a Dalton facility expanded to roughly 5.1 GW annual capacity and a newer Cartersville plant adding about 3.3 GW, bringing combined US output to around 8.4 GW per year. Q-Cells clearly has the stronger institutional footprint, backed by a large industrial parent, verified financial bankability, and multi gigawatt scale domestic production.

In terms of product lines, Mysolar's catalog spans PERC, half-cut, shingled, HJT, and bifacial modules in a fairly wide range of wattages, positioning it as a budget to mid tier option aimed at residential and small commercial rooftops where price sensitivity matters more than brand pedigree. Q-Cells, by contrast, is best known for its Q.ANTUM and newer Q.ANTUM NEO cell technology, culminating in the Q.TRON G2 series, which uses advanced PERC and TOPCon derived architectures to reach average efficiencies around 21 percent and top models above 22.5 percent; these panels serve premium residential rooftops as well as larger commercial and utility scale installations, backed by long standing US warranty and service infrastructure.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Q-Cells is the safer default given its confirmed Tier 1 bankability, proven efficiency track record, and large scale domestic manufacturing footprint, which matters for financing, insurance, and long term warranty confidence. Mysolar USA may appeal to cost conscious buyers willing to accept a less established brand history in exchange for competitive pricing, but it has not yet demonstrated the same independent bankability or manufacturing scale, so buyers should weigh that tradeoff carefully rather than treating the two brands as interchangeable.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review Of Qcells Solar Panels For 2025 \| review

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels \| QCells Solar Panels Review 2025: Cost, Efficiency and Performance \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2019/09/23/hanwha-q-cells-opens-largest-solar-factory-in-the-western-hemisphere/ \| Hanwha Q Cells opens largest solar factory in the Western Hemisphere \| article

\- https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-new-cartersville-factory-set-for-33-gw-of-solar-module-production-per-year.do \| Hanwha Qcells Cartersville factory set for 3.3 GW production per year \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/mysolar-usa \| Mysolar Manufacturing USA Inc. company profile \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Mysolar USA vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/mysolar-usa-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Mysolar USA vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/mysolar-usa-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Mysolar USA vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/mysolar-usa-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/mysolar-usa-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.