--- title: "MY Solar vs Waaree - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare MY Solar vs Waaree solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/my-solar-vs-waaree" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/my-solar/waaree.png" --- # MY Solar vs Waaree Waaree has the broader catalog (222 vs 140 models). MY Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.82%. ## The two companies | Attribute | MY Solar | Waaree | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | India | | Headquarters | | Mumbai | | Founded | | 1990 | | Employees | | 8500+ | | Annual capacity | | 13.3 GW/year | | Tier 1 | no | yes | | Listed | | NSE: WAAREEENER | | Website | | [https://www.waaree.com/](https://www.waaree.com/) | Waaree Energies Ltd. is a leading global energy transition company committed to delivering innovative, high-quality solar and sustainable energy solutions. Established in 1990 and headquartered in Mumbai, India, the company operates across 20+ countries with an integrated portfolio that spans solar modules, EPC... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | MY Solar | Waaree | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 140 | 222 | +82 | | Max Power | 740 W | 730 W | +10 W | | Avg Power | 418 W | 371 W | +47 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | MY Solar | Waaree | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.82% | 23.51% | +0.31 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 19.87% | 18.39% | +1.48 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | MY Solar | Waaree | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.333%/°C | -0.362%/°C | +0.030 | | Bifacial Share | 54 (39%) | 85 (38%) | +0 pp | | Avg Warranty | 27.1 yrs | 21.7 yrs | +5.4 yr | ## Efficiency distribution MY Solar skews to higher efficiency: 4% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | MY Solar | Waaree | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 75 (53.6%) | 139 (62.6%) | | 20-21% | 10 (7.1%) | 47 (21.2%) | | 21-22% | 19 (13.6%) | 14 (6.3%) | | 22-23% | 30 (21.4%) | 13 (5.9%) | | 23%+ | 6 (4.3%) | 9 (4.1%) | ## Power distribution MY Solar offers more 600W+ panels (21% of lineup) | Power band | MY Solar | Waaree | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 66 (47.1%) | 124 (55.9%) | | 400-499W | 35 (25.0%) | 35 (15.8%) | | 500-599W | 10 (7.1%) | 36 (16.2%) | | 600-699W | 18 (12.9%) | 20 (9.0%) | | 700W+ | 11 (7.9%) | 7 (3.2%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: PERC (58%) Dominant cell tech: PERC (48%) | Technology | MY Solar | Waaree | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 81 (57.9%) | 107 (48.2%) | | HJT | 29 (20.7%) | 7 (3.2%) | | TOPCon | 25 (17.9%) | 12 (5.4%) | | Unknown | 5 (3.6%) | 88 (39.6%) | | N-type | 0 | 8 (3.6%) | ## Top panels, MY Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [MS740N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms740n-hjtgb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [MS735N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms735n-hjtgb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [MS730N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms730n-hjtgb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [MS725N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms725n-hjtgb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [MS720N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms720n-hjtgb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [MS715N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms715n-hjtgb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [MS710N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms710n-hjtgb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [MS705N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms705n-hjtgb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [MY-M12/144-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-my-m12-144-700) | 700 | 22.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [MS700N-DHBG](https://comparepv.com/panel/my-solar-ms700n-dhbg) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Waaree | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [BiH-11-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [BiH-11-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [BiH-11-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [BiH-11-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [BiH-11-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [BiH-11-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [BiH-11-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [Bi-68-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bi-68-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [WSMD-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [WSMD-660](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-660) | 660 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary MySolar operates as Mysolar Manufacturing USA Inc., a subsidiary of Mamibot Manufacturing USA Co. Ltd., and positions itself as a specialist in advanced photovoltaic cell technologies rather than a high-volume commodity producer. Its Tier 1 or BloombergNEF bankability rating was not confirmed in available sources, which suggests it remains outside the institutionally rated tier that large project financiers typically require. Waaree Energies, headquartered in Mumbai, India, occupies a very different league: pv-magazine reported that by late 2025 the company's global module manufacturing capacity had reached approximately 22.3 GW, spread across facilities in India and the United States, and Waaree is the only Indian solar manufacturer to have held continuous Tier 1 status for an 18-month period. On institutional footprint and industrial scale, Waaree is clearly the stronger of the two. MySolar's product lineup is built around three cell platforms: N-type HJT (heterojunction), N-type TOPCon, and a proprietary shingled architecture that bonds cells with electrically conductive adhesive rather than conventional busbars. Its flagship GOLD HJT bifacial glass-glass panel claims efficiencies of around 22.86% at output levels above 720 W, while the Plati and Supo Fullblack series address aesthetics-driven residential rooftop buyers seeking a low-visibility all-black appearance. Waaree's portfolio is considerably broader: its Elite bifacial N-type TOPCon modules cover roughly 415 W to 590 W and above, serving residential, commercial and industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount segments. Waaree's ALMM certification supports procurement on the Indian market, and its US production capacity makes it relevant for buyers subject to domestic-content requirements in North America. For a typical international buyer who values documented bankability, predictable supply chain depth, and wide installer familiarity, Waaree is the more straightforward default. MySolar becomes the more compelling option when a specific technology advantage matters - particularly HJT efficiency or shingled aesthetics on space-constrained urban rooftops where output per square metre has direct financial value. The two brands are not interchangeable in positioning: Waaree is the industrial-scale reference choice, while MySolar is a technology-niche alternative suited to buyers who have a clear reason to seek it out. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [MY Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/my-solar-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-waaree) - [MY Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/my-solar-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-waaree) - [MY Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/my-solar-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-waaree) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/my-solar-vs-waaree Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.