---
title: "MWG vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare MWG vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/mwg-vs-trina-solar"
---

# MWG vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 2 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | MWG | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Poland | China |
| Headquarters | Zabrze | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2005 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://mwpower.pl](https://mwpower.pl) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

MW Power is a Polish brand operating under MPL Group, offering a range of technology products including photovoltaic panels sold under the MW Green Power (MWG) brand. Their solar modules are small-wattage units (10W–100W) made from monocrystalline silicon, primarily intended for autonomous and off-grid energy systems...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | MWG | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 2 | 340 | +338 |
| Max Power | 400 W | 760 W | +360 W |
| Avg Power | 370 W | 520 W | +150 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | MWG | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 20.12% | 24.80% | +4.68 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 19.72% | 21.71% | +1.99 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | MWG | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.390%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.088 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | MWG | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (50.0%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 1 (50.0%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | MWG | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (50.0%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 1 (50.0%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | MWG | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 2 (100.0%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, MWG


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MWG-400M](https://comparepv.com/panel/mwg-mwg-400m) | 400 | 19.3 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MWG-340M](https://comparepv.com/panel/mwg-mwg-340m) | 340 | 20.1 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

MWG is a brand of photovoltaic modules belonging to MW Power, a Polish company founded in 2005. It operates primarily as a regional player in the Polish and Central European market and does not appear on major bankability rankings such as the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou, founded in 1997, and consistently ranked among the world's largest solar producers. It holds an established BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and annual production capacity exceeding 80 GW, placing it alongside LONGi, JA Solar, Jinko Solar, and Tongwei at the very top of the global industry. On any measure of institutional footprint - financial backing, global reach, or third-party bankability - Trina Solar operates in a fundamentally different league.

Trina Solar's current portfolio covers the full spectrum of applications. The Vertex S+ G3 series, built on TOPCon cell technology confirmed by pv-magazine coverage, targets residential rooftop installations with module outputs around 485 W and options including full-black and enhanced hail-resistance variants. The Vertex N range addresses commercial and industrial (C&I) customers with outputs reaching approximately 670 W, while the utility-scale flagship of the same family reaches 760 W at 24.5% module efficiency using bifacial dual-glass construction intended to reduce balance-of-system costs and LCOE on large ground-mount projects. MWG's publicly available product information points to lower-wattage modules suited to small residential and off-grid applications, with limited evidence of a comparable multi-segment offering.

For most buyers - residential homeowners, C&I energy managers, or utility developers - Trina Solar is the straightforward default: it is bankable, globally serviced, and its TOPCon Vertex lineup has well-documented, independently reviewed performance across all major use cases. MWG may be a reasonable local option for very small Polish residential installations where proximity and cost sensitivity outweigh global support considerations, but for any project involving project finance, EPC contractors, or long-term warranty reliance, Trina Solar is the clear choice. The two brands are not interchangeable - they serve meaningfully different segments of the solar market.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [MWG vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/mwg-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [MWG vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/mwg-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [MWG vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/mwg-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/mwg-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.