---
title: "MWG vs AIKO - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare MWG vs AIKO solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/mwg-vs-aiko"
---

# MWG vs AIKO

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 2 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | MWG | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Poland | China |
| Headquarters | Zabrze | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2005 | 2009 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 600732 |
| Website | [https://mwpower.pl](https://mwpower.pl) | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) |

MW Power is a Polish brand operating under MPL Group, offering a range of technology products including photovoltaic panels sold under the MW Green Power (MWG) brand. Their solar modules are small-wattage units (10W–100W) made from monocrystalline silicon, primarily intended for autonomous and off-grid energy systems...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | MWG | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 2 | 144 | +142 |
| Max Power | 400 W | 805 W | +405 W |
| Avg Power | 370 W | 581 W | +211 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | MWG | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 20.12% | 25.20% | +5.08 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 19.72% | 23.65% | +3.93 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | MWG | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.390%/°C | -0.271%/°C | +0.119 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 35 (24%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 29.5 yrs | +4.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | MWG | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (50.0%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 20-21% | 1 (50.0%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 12 (8.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 123 (85.4%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | MWG | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (50.0%) | 2 (1.4%) |
| 400-499W | 1 (50.0%) | 50 (34.7%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 5 (3.5%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 78 (54.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 9 (6.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | MWG | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 2 (100.0%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 0 | 119 (82.6%) |
| N-type | 0 | 17 (11.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 7 (4.9%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 1 (0.7%) |


## Top panels, MWG


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MWG-400M](https://comparepv.com/panel/mwg-mwg-400m) | 400 | 19.3 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MWG-340M](https://comparepv.com/panel/mwg-mwg-340m) | 340 | 20.1 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

MWG is a brand for which no reliable, independently verifiable industry profile could be located across major industry databases, Tier 1 lists, or trade press outlets consulted for this comparison. No BloombergNEF bankability classification, disclosed production-capacity figure, or sustained media coverage was found under that brand name. AIKO Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer founded in the mid-1990s and headquartered in Guangdong province, with a vertically integrated production network spanning multiple gigafactories across Yiwu, Foshan, Zhuhai, and Jinan. AIKO achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2024 and, according to Tier 1 tracking sources, had roughly 20 GW of annual cell and module capacity in early 2025, growing substantially through 2026. On institutional footprint, AIKO holds a clear and documentable advantage over a brand whose public profile cannot be confirmed.

AIKO's product identity is anchored around its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) N-type cell architecture, which eliminates front-side metal busbars to maximize active cell area and combines amorphous-silicon passivation with a back-contact layout. Its flagship Neostar residential series reaches module efficiencies in the 22-24 percent range, and AIKO has consistently topped the Taiyangnews global module efficiency rankings since early 2023. The technology is best suited to space-constrained residential rooftops and premium commercial installations where high energy yield per square meter justifies a slight price premium over mainstream TOPCon or PERC alternatives. AIKO also maintains a European R&D presence through Solarlab AIKO Europe in Freiburg, Germany, which supports bankability for project finance in Western markets.

For a typical buyer in 2025 evaluating these two brands, AIKO is the only one for which meaningful due diligence is currently possible - its Tier 1 status, warranty terms, and technology roadmap are all on public record. Until MWG can be verified through independent industry sources, it cannot be responsibly recommended alongside a confirmed Tier 1 manufacturer for financed or warranty-dependent installations.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| AIKO Solar review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review

\- https://sunsparkenergy.com.au/blog/solar-panels-1/aiko-solar-panels-review-2025-14 \| AIKO Solar Panels Review 2025 - Sun Spark Energy \| review

\- https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/ \| AIKO Achieves Prestigious Tier 1 Status by BloombergNEF \| article

\- https://www.vicoexport.com/en/67499/tier-1-list-of-solar-panel-manufacturers-q2-2026/ \| Tier 1 List of Solar Panel Manufacturers Q2 2026 - Vico Export \| article

\- https://www.pscenergy.com.au/blog/aiko-solar-panels-gen-3-abc/ \| AIKO Solar Panels Gen 3 ABC - PSC Energy \| article

Sources:

\- \[AIKO Solar review - SolarQuotes Australia\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html)

\- \[AIKO Solar Panels Review 2025 - Sun Spark Energy\](https://sunsparkenergy.com.au/blog/solar-panels-1/aiko-solar-panels-review-2025-14)

\- \[AIKO Achieves Prestigious Tier 1 Status by BloombergNEF\](https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/)

\- \[Tier 1 List of Solar Panel Manufacturers Q2 2026 - Vico Export\](https://www.vicoexport.com/en/67499/tier-1-list-of-solar-panel-manufacturers-q2-2026/)

\- \[AIKO Solar Panels Gen 3 ABC - PSC Energy\](https://www.pscenergy.com.au/blog/aiko-solar-panels-gen-3-abc/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [MWG vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/mwg-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [MWG vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/mwg-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aiko)
- [MWG vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/mwg-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aiko)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/mwg-vs-aiko

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.