---
title: "MSolar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare MSolar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/msolar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# MSolar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 5 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | MSolar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | MSolar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 5 | 340 | +335 |
| Max Power | 370 W | 760 W | +390 W |
| Avg Power | 360 W | 520 W | +160 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | MSolar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 19.80% | 24.80% | +5.00 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 19.27% | 21.71% | +2.44 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | MSolar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.360%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.058 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | MSolar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (100.0%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | MSolar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 5 (100.0%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | MSolar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 5 (100.0%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, MSolar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MS-370M](https://comparepv.com/panel/msolar-ms-370m) | 370 | 19.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MS-365M](https://comparepv.com/panel/msolar-ms-365m) | 365 | 19.5 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MS-360M](https://comparepv.com/panel/msolar-ms-360m) | 360 | 19.3 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MS-355M](https://comparepv.com/panel/msolar-ms-355m) | 355 | 19.0 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MS-350M](https://comparepv.com/panel/msolar-ms-350m) | 350 | 18.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

MSolar is an American solar manufacturer founded in 2018 and based in Mount Jackson, Virginia, where it has committed $23.7 million to a 56,000-square-foot facility designed to produce heterojunction (HJT) cells and finished modules. The plant is projected to manufacture more than half a million panels annually - a scale of several hundred megawatts - and is expected to create around 150 local jobs. MSolar does not appear on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 manufacturer list and remains an early-stage company without a documented track record of large-volume deliveries. Trina Solar, by contrast, was founded in December 1997 by Gao Jifan in Changzhou, China, and operates manufacturing facilities in China, Vietnam, and Thailand with annual production capacity exceeding 90 GW. The company has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for seven consecutive years, earned a 100 percent bankability rating in BloombergNEF's PV Module Bankability survey eight times in a row, and has shipped more than 292 GW of modules cumulatively as of mid-2025. On institutional footprint and bankability, Trina Solar is the substantially stronger of the two.

MSolar's product lineup centers on HJT cell technology, which typically delivers high efficiency and a favorable temperature coefficient relative to conventional PERC. The company orients its offering toward commercial and utility buyers in the United States, and its domestic-manufacturing credential is a meaningful differentiator for procurers navigating US trade policy or seeking non-Chinese supply chains. Trina Solar covers the full range from residential rooftop to utility-scale ground-mount through its Vertex platform. The Vertex S+ series targets homeowners and light commercial installations, while the Vertex N line - built on n-type TOPCon cells - serves large commercial and utility projects at module outputs exceeding 700 W and efficiencies in the 23 percent range. In early 2026 Trina unveiled a 485 W TOPCon panel rated at 24.3 percent efficiency. The Vertex N Shield variant adds hail-resistance certification and a 30-year performance warranty with an annual degradation rate of only 0.4 percent, making it attractive to long-horizon project finance.

For most international buyers - whether residential, commercial, or utility - Trina Solar is the default choice given its verified bankability, broad certified product range, and extensive third-party performance validation including eleven consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer. MSolar represents a legitimate and technologically promising option specifically for US buyers who require domestically manufactured panels for policy compliance or supply-chain resilience, but it remains an early-stage supplier without the institutional depth of a Tier 1 manufacturer. The two brands are not interchangeable: they differ in scale, market maturity, and the geographies they realistically serve.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [MSolar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/msolar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [MSolar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/msolar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [MSolar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/msolar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/msolar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.