---
title: "Motech vs AKCOME - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Motech vs AKCOME solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/motech-vs-akcome"
---

# Motech vs AKCOME

Motech has the broader catalog (28 vs 3 models). Motech leads on peak efficiency at 22.90%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Motech | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Taiwan | China |
| Headquarters | Tainan City | Suzhou |
| Founded | 1981 | 2003 |
| Employees | 2,340 |  |
| Annual capacity | 1.2+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | no |
| Listed | Taipei Exchange (TPEX): 6244 |  |
| Website | [http://www.motechsolar.com](http://www.motechsolar.com) | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) |

Motech Industries Inc. is dedicated to the research, development, and manufacture of high-quality solar products and services, ranging from photovoltaic (PV) cells, PV modules, to PV power systems. The company has evolved from a test and measurement instruments designer and manufacturer to a full-service global solar...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Motech | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 28 | 3 | +25 |
| Max Power | 590 W | 700 W | +110 W |
| Avg Power | 421 W | 672 W | +251 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Motech | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.90% | 22.54% | +0.36 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.10% | 21.63% | +1.53 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Motech | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.360%/°C | -0.240%/°C | +0.120 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (11%) | 3 (100%) | +89 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +5.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | Motech | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 12 (42.9%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 7 (25.0%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 3 (10.7%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 22-23% | 6 (21.4%) | 1 (33.3%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | Motech | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 13 (46.4%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 9 (32.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 6 (21.4%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 0 | 2 (66.7%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 1 (33.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (11%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | Motech | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 22 (78.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 3 (10.7%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 3 (10.7%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 3 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, Motech


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [XN72KF-590](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xn72kf-590) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [XN72KF-585](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xn72kf-585) | 585 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [XN72KF-580](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xn72kf-580) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [XS72CF-550](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xs72cf-550) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.348 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [XS72CF-545](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xs72cf-545) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.348 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [XS72CF-540](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xs72cf-540) | 540 | 20.9 | -0.348 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [XN60KF-495](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xn60kf-495) | 495 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [XN60KF-490](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xn60kf-490) | 490 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [XN60KF-485](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xn60kf-485) | 485 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [XS60CF-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xs60cf-455) | 455 | 21.0 | -0.348 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

This confirms significant financial distress at AKCOME, which is material to the comparison.

AKCOME is a Chinese solar manufacturer, headquartered in Jiangsu with a production base in Zhejiang, that historically achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status on the strength of N-type module output and shipments reported in the tens of gigawatts. However, its parent Zhejiang Akcome New Energy Innovation and a key subsidiary entered bankruptcy reorganization proceedings in 2024 after years of net losses, and the company was delisted from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in August 2024, with several production lines suspended and its brand dropped from TaiyangNews module tracking in January 2025. Motech is a Taiwan-headquartered manufacturer founded in 1981 that entered solar cell production in 1999 and became the only Taiwan-based developer of N-type TOPCon cells, backed by Taiwan's ITRI; it has been steadily expanding TOPCon cell capacity toward 8 GW and has not achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 listing in recent review periods. Despite lacking Tier 1 status, Motech has a stable institutional footprint as an established, non-distressed manufacturer, whereas AKCOME's current bankability is undermined by its ongoing restructuring, giving Motech the stronger and more dependable footprint today.

AKCOME's product range has centered on HJT modules under its AK iPower series and TOPCon modules under the AK iTopper series, spanning roughly 440W to 745W panels aimed at residential, commercial and ground-mounted installations, with reported average efficiencies around 21.6 percent and performance warranties around 30 years, plus a secondary line in aluminium racking and mounting systems. Motech, by contrast, operates primarily as a cell-centric TOPCon supplier rather than a globally branded module seller, producing high-efficiency N-type TOPCon cells in the 25 to 25.5 percent range that are typically integrated into modules by other manufacturers or used in projects where non-China-origin cell content is required, making it less visible as a standalone consumer or installer brand.

For a typical 2025 buyer prioritizing warranty security and long-term brand continuity, Motech is the safer default given AKCOME's bankruptcy reorganization and stock delisting, which create real doubt about future warranty honoring and parts availability. AKCOME modules may still appeal to buyers in markets like Australia where existing distribution and warranty support remain active, but the financial instability is a material risk factor that should be weighed against any short-term price advantage.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/06/17/akcome-halts-some-manufacturing-faces-possible-chinese-stock-delisting/ \| Akcome halts manufacturing, faces possible stock delisting \| article

\- https://energynews.oedigital.com/environment/2024/07/30/chinese-solar-company-akcomes-subsidiary-declares-personal-bankruptcy-amidst-plunging-prices-overcapacity \| Akcome subsidiary declares bankruptcy amid price plunge \| article

\- https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20221214PD204/motech.html \| Motech is only Taiwanese maker of TOPCon solar cells \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/12/01/topcon-solar-module-tech-from-taiwan/ \| TOPCon solar module tech from Taiwan (Motech) \| article

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome Solar Panels: An Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Motech vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/motech-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome)
- [Motech vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/motech-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-akcome)
- [Motech vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/motech-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/motech-vs-akcome

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.