---
title: "Mogen Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Mogen Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/mogen-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Mogen Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 5 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Mogen Solar leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Mogen Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Mogen Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 5 | 340 | +335 |
| Max Power | 435 W | 760 W | +325 W |
| Avg Power | 424 W | 520 W | +96 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Mogen Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.00% | 24.80% | +2.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.52% | 21.71% | +0.19 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Mogen Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.002 |
| Bifacial Share | 5 (100%) | 145 (43%) | +57 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Mogen Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 4 (80.0%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (20.0%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Mogen Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 5 (100.0%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Mogen Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 5 (100.0%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Mogen Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MG-435TD](https://comparepv.com/panel/mogen-solar-mg-435td) | 435 | 22.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MG-430TD](https://comparepv.com/panel/mogen-solar-mg-430td) | 430 | 21.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MG-425TD](https://comparepv.com/panel/mogen-solar-mg-425td) | 425 | 21.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MG-420TD](https://comparepv.com/panel/mogen-solar-mg-420td) | 420 | 21.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MG-410TD](https://comparepv.com/panel/mogen-solar-mg-410td) | 410 | 21.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Mogen Solar is a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer founded in 2010, with annual module production capacity of approximately 3 GW. The company maintains sales offices in Spain and the Netherlands and has announced plans to add manufacturing in Thailand to serve the US market. It does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable manufacturer list, which limits its visibility in project-finance-driven procurement. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China, ranks among the three largest solar manufacturers globally, with annual production capacity around 100 GW and more than 225 GW in cumulative shipments across 160-plus countries. Trina holds a confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation as of Q1 2025 - a status it has maintained for many consecutive years - employs roughly 30,000 people, and operates manufacturing in China, Thailand, Vietnam and the United States. On institutional footprint and lender confidence, Trina Solar leads by a substantial margin.

Trina Solar's Vertex series targets utility-scale and large commercial ground-mount installations using large-format wafers, while the Vertex S and Vertex S+ G3 families serve residential rooftop and small C&I projects, including full-black and hail-resistant variants. The Vertex N line applies n-type i-TOPCon cell technology, with module efficiencies reported between roughly 19% and 22.5% across the range; the utility-scale Vertex N flagship reached 760 W at 24.5% efficiency entering mass production in 2025. Mogen Solar offers panels in PERC, TOPCon and HJT technologies spanning from small residential modules up to formats exceeding 700 W. Since late 2022 the company has shipped more than 500 MW of TOPCon and HJT modules, demonstrating a credible commitment to advanced cell technologies, though its global installed base and third-party validation trail Trina's by a wide margin.

For most international buyers, Trina Solar is the more straightforward default choice: Tier 1 bankability, decades of operational history, and a global service network reduce both project risk and financing friction in ways Mogen Solar cannot yet match. Mogen may suit price-sensitive buyers or niche projects seeking HJT or TOPCon modules where institutional bankability is not a lender requirement. The two brands are not interchangeable - Trina Solar is an established top-tier supplier with a global track record; Mogen Solar is a capable but smaller challenger still accumulating the credentials that larger markets demand.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Mogen Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/mogen-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Mogen Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/mogen-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Mogen Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/mogen-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/mogen-solar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.