---
title: "Mission Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Mission Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/mission-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Mission Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 24 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Mission Solar leans bifacial (75% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Mission Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | United States | China |
| Headquarters | San Antonio | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2014 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.missionsolar.com](https://www.missionsolar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Mission Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 24 | 340 | +316 |
| Max Power | 670 W | 760 W | +90 W |
| Avg Power | 554 W | 520 W | +34 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Mission Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.00% | 24.80% | +1.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.11% | 21.71% | +0.40 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Mission Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.313%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.012 |
| Bifacial Share | 18 (75%) | 145 (43%) | +32 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.8 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +0.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Mission Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 2 (8.3%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 7 (29.2%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 13 (54.2%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (8.3%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Mission Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 6 (25.0%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 12 (50.0%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 6 (25.0%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Mission Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| N-type | 9 (37.5%) | 6 (1.8%) |
| PERC | 9 (37.5%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| TOPCon | 6 (25.0%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, Mission Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MST12670HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12670hp3g) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MST12665HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12665hp3g) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MST12660HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12660hp3g) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MST12R620HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r620hn3g) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MST12R615HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r615hn3g) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [MST12R610HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r610hn3g) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [MSH10-595HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msh10-595hn4g) | 595 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [MSI10-590HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msi10-590hn4g) | 590 | 22.9 | -0.298 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [MSH10-590HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msh10-590hn4g) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [MSI10-585HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msi10-585hn4g) | 585 | 22.7 | -0.298 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Mission Solar is a US-based manufacturer founded in 2014 in San Antonio, Texas, and operates as a subsidiary of OCI Holdings, a South Korean industrial conglomerate established in 1959. Every module is assembled at the Texas facility, shielding buyers from import tariffs and qualifying projects for a domestic content tax credit bonus on top of the standard US investment or production tax credit. A $265 million expansion announced in March 2025 is expected to lift production capacity from roughly 1 GW toward 3 GW. Trina Solar, headquartered in Changzhou, China, was founded in 1997 and has grown into one of the world's largest photovoltaic producers, with cumulative shipments exceeding 292 GW by mid-2025. The company has achieved a 100% bankability rating from BloombergNEF for eight consecutive years and held Tier 1 status in Q2 2025 under tightened eligibility criteria. With annual production capacity approaching 120 GW, Trina Solar carries a substantially larger institutional footprint in global project finance.

Mission Solar offers both PERC and TOPCon product lines for residential, commercial and industrial, and utility segments, primarily in North America. Its TOPCon residential module - the MSX N-type 180HC - reaches 435 W at 22.8% efficiency, while the bifacial N-type 132HC series delivers 620 W at 23% efficiency for C&I and utility applications. The brand's core appeal is domestic manufacture, local warranty support, and supply-chain predictability for buyers sensitive to tariff-driven cost swings. Trina Solar's portfolio spans a considerably wider range. Its flagship Vertex N series uses i-TOPCon Ultra cell technology and peaks at 760 W with 24.5% efficiency for utility-scale ground-mount installations, while a 670 W variant targets C&I rooftops and a 495 W module covers residential use. Trina Solar has held TOP Performer recognition from Kiwa PVEL for eleven consecutive years, providing consistent third-party validation of field reliability.

For North American buyers who need tariff immunity, domestic content incentives, and local after-sales support, Mission Solar is a strong fit within its wattage range. For international buyers, utility-scale developers, and projects where bankability documentation and the latest high-wattage TOPCon technology are decisive, Trina Solar is the default recommendation. The two brands serve fundamentally different supply contexts and should not be treated as interchangeable.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Mission Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/mission-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Mission Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/mission-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Mission Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/mission-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/mission-solar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.