---
title: "Mission Solar vs Solarever - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Mission Solar vs Solarever solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/mission-solar-vs-solarever"
---

# Mission Solar vs Solarever

Mission Solar has the broader catalog (24 vs 12 models). Solarever leads on peak efficiency at 23.52%. Solarever leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Mission Solar | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | United States | Mexico |
| Headquarters | San Antonio | Colima |
| Founded | 2014 | 2012 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  | 1-2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.missionsolar.com](https://www.missionsolar.com) | [https://www.solarever.com.mx](https://www.solarever.com.mx) |

Solarever is a Mexican solar panel manufacturer, recognized as the number one national solar brand in Mexico, with a main production facility in the state of Colima. The company produces monocrystalline half-cut mono PERC solar panels and expanded into the US market in 2015-2016 through Solarever USA, with offices in...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Mission Solar | Solarever | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 24 | 12 | +12 |
| Max Power | 670 W | 630 W | +40 W |
| Avg Power | 554 W | 550 W | +3 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Mission Solar | Solarever | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.00% | 23.52% | +0.52 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.11% | 22.88% | +0.76 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Mission Solar | Solarever | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.313%/°C | -0.294%/°C | +0.019 |
| Bifacial Share | 18 (75%) | 12 (100%) | +25 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.8 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +1.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Solarever skews to higher efficiency: 42% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Mission Solar | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 2 (8.3%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 7 (29.2%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 13 (54.2%) | 7 (58.3%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (8.3%) | 5 (41.7%) |


## Power distribution

Solarever offers more 600W+ panels (58% of lineup)


| Power band | Mission Solar | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 6 (25.0%) | 5 (41.7%) |
| 500-599W | 12 (50.0%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 6 (25.0%) | 7 (58.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)


| Technology | Mission Solar | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| N-type | 9 (37.5%) | 0 |
| PERC | 9 (37.5%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 6 (25.0%) | 12 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, Mission Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MST12670HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12670hp3g) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MST12665HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12665hp3g) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MST12660HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12660hp3g) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MST12R620HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r620hn3g) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MST12R615HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r615hn3g) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [MST12R610HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r610hn3g) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [MSH10-595HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msh10-595hn4g) | 595 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [MSI10-590HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msi10-590hn4g) | 590 | 22.9 | -0.298 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [MSH10-590HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msh10-590hn4g) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [MSI10-585HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msi10-585hn4g) | 585 | 22.7 | -0.298 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Solarever


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE-182\*105-630M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-630m-132-bd) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-625m-132-bd) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE-182\*105-620M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-620m-132-bd) | 620 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE-182\*105-615M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-615m-132-bd) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE-182\*105-610M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-610m-132-bd) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SE-182\*105-605M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-605m-132-bd) | 605 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SE-182\*105-600M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-600m-132-bd) | 600 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SE-182\*105-470M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-470m-96-bd) | 470 | 23.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-465m-96-bd) | 465 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SE-182\*105-460M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-460m-96-bd) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [Mission Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/mission-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Solarever](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-solarever)
- [Mission Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/mission-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Solarever](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-solarever)
- [Mission Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/mission-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Solarever](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-solarever)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/mission-solar-vs-solarever

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.