---
title: "Mission Solar vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Mission Solar vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/mission-solar-vs-q-cells"
---

# Mission Solar vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 24 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Mission Solar leans bifacial (75% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Mission Solar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | United States | South Korea |
| Headquarters | San Antonio | Seoul |
| Founded | 2014 | 1999 |
| Employees |  | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://www.missionsolar.com](https://www.missionsolar.com) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Mission Solar | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 24 | 89 | +65 |
| Max Power | 670 W | 675 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 554 W | 468 W | +86 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Mission Solar | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.00% | 23.20% | +0.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.11% | 21.21% | +0.90 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Mission Solar | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.313%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.011 |
| Bifacial Share | 18 (75%) | 35 (39%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.8 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Mission Solar skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Mission Solar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 2 (8.3%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 7 (29.2%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 13 (54.2%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (8.3%) | 2 (2.2%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (7.9%) |


## Power distribution

Mission Solar offers more 600W+ panels (25% of lineup)


| Power band | Mission Solar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 6 (25.0%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 12 (50.0%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 6 (25.0%) | 17 (19.1%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Mission Solar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| N-type | 9 (37.5%) | 23 (25.8%) |
| PERC | 9 (37.5%) | 38 (42.7%) |
| TOPCon | 6 (25.0%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Top panels, Mission Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MST12670HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12670hp3g) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MST12665HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12665hp3g) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MST12660HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12660hp3g) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MST12R620HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r620hn3g) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MST12R615HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r615hn3g) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [MST12R610HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r610hn3g) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [MSH10-595HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msh10-595hn4g) | 595 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [MSI10-590HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msi10-590hn4g) | 590 | 22.9 | -0.298 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [MSH10-590HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msh10-590hn4g) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [MSI10-585HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msi10-585hn4g) | 585 | 22.7 | -0.298 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Mission Solar is a U.S. manufacturer founded in 2014 and headquartered in San Antonio, Texas, under parent company OCI Enterprises. The company assembles its modules entirely on U.S. soil and in early 2025 announced a $265 million investment to add 2 GW of solar cell production capacity at its San Antonio campus - a move that would make it more vertically integrated and reinforce its American-made credentials. Its modules carry UL and CEC listings and are marketed as Tier 1 bankable, with warranties backed by a third-party insurer. Q CELLS traces its roots to Germany, where it was established in 1999 before being acquired by South Korea's Hanwha Group in 2012. Today the company maintains dual headquarters in Seoul and Thalheim, Germany, and operates one of the largest solar manufacturing facilities in the Western Hemisphere in Dalton, Georgia. Q CELLS is confirmed on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list and was recognized as an S&P Global Tier 1 Cleantech company in 2025, giving it a substantially broader institutional footprint than Mission Solar.

Q CELLS serves residential, commercial, and utility-scale markets with a product range spanning from roughly 335 W to 635 W. Its established residential line, the Q.PEAK DUO, is built on the company's proprietary Q.ANTUM DUO cell architecture - a PERC-based technology - while newer lines such as the Q.TRON series use N-type TOPCon cells. Mission Solar's catalog has historically centered on PERC-based modules for residential and commercial rooftop use, but the company is moving into N-type TOPCon as well, with a 435 W N-type module introduced at RE+ 2025 reaching 22.8% efficiency. Both brands produce panels that can qualify for domestic content incentives under the Inflation Reduction Act.

For most buyers in 2025, Q CELLS is the more straightforward default: its global track record, confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, wider product range, and deep U.S. manufacturing presence make projects easier to finance and insure at any scale. Mission Solar is a compelling option for buyers who specifically prize a fully U.S.-assembled product with strong insulation from AD/CVD tariffs - particularly as its cell factory comes online - but it remains a smaller and less globally recognized player by comparison.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/03/25/mission-solar-announces-2-gw-solar-cell-factory-in-texas/ \| Mission Solar announces 2 GW solar cell factory in Texas \| article

\- https://www.solar.com/learn/mission-solar-energy-complete-solar-panels-review/ \| Mission Solar Energy - Complete Solar Panels Review \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review of Q CELLS Solar Panels for 2025 \| review

\- https://solartechonline.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-review-2025/ \| Hanwha Q CELLS Solar Panels Review 2025 - Expert Analysis \| review

Sources:

\- \[Mission Solar announces 2 GW solar cell factory in Texas\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/03/25/mission-solar-announces-2-gw-solar-cell-factory-in-texas/)

\- \[Mission Solar Energy Complete Review - Solar.com\](https://www.solar.com/learn/mission-solar-energy-complete-solar-panels-review/)

\- \[Expert Review of Q CELLS Solar Panels - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Hanwha Q CELLS Solar Panels Review 2025 - SolarTechOnline\](https://solartechonline.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-review-2025/)

\- \[Hanwha Qcells named 2025 S&P Global Tier 1 company\](https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-named-an-s-p-global-2025-tier-1-cleantech-company.do)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Mission Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/mission-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Mission Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/mission-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Mission Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/mission-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/mission-solar-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.