--- title: "Maxeon vs Seraphim - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Maxeon vs Seraphim solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/maxeon-vs-seraphim" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/maxeon/seraphim.png" --- # Maxeon vs Seraphim Seraphim has the broader catalog (160 vs 36 models). Maxeon leads on peak efficiency at 24.00%. Seraphim leans bifacial (69% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Maxeon | Seraphim | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Singapore | China | | Headquarters | Singapore | Changzhou | | Founded | 2020 | 2011 | | Employees | | 1001-5000 | | Annual capacity | | 13 GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | NASDAQ: MAXN | | | Website | [https://www.maxeon.com](https://www.maxeon.com) | [https://www.seraphim-energy.com](https://www.seraphim-energy.com) | Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Maxeon | Seraphim | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 36 | 160 | +124 | | Max Power | 555 W | 730 W | +175 W | | Avg Power | 444 W | 549 W | +105 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Maxeon | Seraphim | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 24.00% | 23.50% | +0.50 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.36% | 21.82% | +0.46 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Maxeon | Seraphim | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.294%/°C | -0.316%/°C | +0.023 | | Bifacial Share | 19 (53%) | 111 (69%) | +17 pp | | Avg Warranty | 31.4 yrs | 28.8 yrs | +2.6 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Seraphim skews to higher efficiency: 12% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Maxeon | Seraphim | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 7 (19.4%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 4 (11.1%) | 32 (20.0%) | | 21-22% | 8 (22.2%) | 58 (36.2%) | | 22-23% | 14 (38.9%) | 51 (31.9%) | | 23%+ | 3 (8.3%) | 19 (11.9%) | ## Power distribution Seraphim offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup) | Power band | Maxeon | Seraphim | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 7 (19.4%) | 2 (1.2%) | | 400-499W | 17 (47.2%) | 55 (34.4%) | | 500-599W | 12 (33.3%) | 47 (29.4%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 45 (28.1%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 11 (6.9%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: Back Contact (42%) Dominant cell tech: PERC (52%) | Technology | Maxeon | Seraphim | | --- | --- | --- | | Back Contact | 15 (41.7%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 12 (33.3%) | 66 (41.2%) | | PERC | 7 (19.4%) | 84 (52.5%) | | Flexible | 2 (5.6%) | 0 | | HJT | 0 | 6 (3.8%) | | N-type | 0 | 4 (2.5%) | ## Top panels, Maxeon | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SPR-P7-555-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-555-com-s) | 555 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SPR-P7-550-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-550-com-s) | 550 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SPR-P7-545-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-545-com-s) | 545 | 22.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SPR-P7-540-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-540-com-s) | 540 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SPR-P7-535-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-535-com-s) | 535 | 21.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [SPR-P7-530-COM-S](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p7-530-com-s) | 530 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [SPR-P6-525-UPP](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p6-525-upp) | 525 | 20.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [SPR-P6-520-UPP](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p6-520-upp) | 520 | 20.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [SPR-P6-515-UPP](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p6-515-upp) | 515 | 19.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [SPR-P6-510-UPP](https://comparepv.com/panel/maxeon-spr-p6-510-upp) | 510 | 19.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Seraphim | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SRP-730-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SRP-725-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-725-bhc-bg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SRP-720-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-bhc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SRP-720-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-btc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SRP-715-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-bhc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [SRP-715-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-btc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [SRP-710-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-bhc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [SRP-710-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-btc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [SRP-705-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-bhc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [SRP-705-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-btc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Other comparisons - [Maxeon vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/maxeon-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-seraphim) - [Maxeon vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/maxeon-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-seraphim) - [Maxeon vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/maxeon-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-seraphim) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/maxeon-vs-seraphim Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.