--- title: "Luxor vs AIKO - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Luxor vs AIKO solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/luxor-vs-aiko" --- # Luxor vs AIKO AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 0 models). AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Luxor | AIKO | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Germany | China | | Headquarters | Stuttgart | Shanghai | | Founded | 2007 | 2009 | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | yes | | Listed | | SZSE: 600732 | | Website | [https://www.luxor-solar.com](https://www.luxor-solar.com) | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Luxor | AIKO | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 0 | 144 | +144 | | Max Power | 0 W | 805 W | +805 W | | Avg Power | 0 W | 581 W | +581 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Luxor | AIKO | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | - | 25.20% | | | Avg Efficiency | - | 23.65% | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Luxor | AIKO | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.271%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 35 (24%) | +24 pp | | Avg Warranty | - | 29.5 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Luxor | AIKO | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 12 (8.3%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 123 (85.4%) | ## Power distribution AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup) | Power band | Luxor | AIKO | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 0 | 2 (1.4%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 50 (34.7%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 5 (3.5%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 78 (54.2%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 9 (6.2%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%) | Technology | Luxor | AIKO | | --- | --- | --- | | Back Contact | 0 | 119 (82.6%) | | N-type | 0 | 17 (11.8%) | | PERC | 0 | 7 (4.9%) | | Flexible | 0 | 1 (0.7%) | ## Top panels, AIKO | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AIKO is a Chinese manufacturer that has built its reputation around its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) N-type cell architecture, which places all electrical contacts on the rear of the cell to eliminate front-side shading losses. The company reached BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status in 2024 and reported a production capacity of around 20 GW as of early 2025, placing it firmly among the larger-scale module makers. Luxor Solar GmbH, founded in 2007 and headquartered in Stuttgart, Germany, is a European brand that manufactures its panels in China and distributes across more than 85 countries. Luxor claims a production capacity of roughly 6.8 GW and has repeatedly earned the EuPD Research "Top Brand PV" seal in Germany, though no search result confirmed a BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation for Luxor. On institutional scale and bankability documentation, AIKO currently carries the stronger footprint. The two brands target somewhat different customer segments. AIKO's main residential line, the Neostar series, offers module efficiencies up to 24.3% and is aimed at space-constrained rooftops where maximising output per square metre justifies a premium price; its Comet series (600-630 W range) addresses commercial and industrial rooftops. The ABC platform also delivers an unusually low temperature coefficient of around -0.26%/°C and a first-year degradation of no more than 1%, which matters in hot climates. Luxor's portfolio leans more toward the mainstream European residential and commercial segments, with TOPCon cells featured in a significant share of newer models and a reported 66% bifacial ratio across its catalogue. Luxor's panels span a broad wattage range and the brand emphasises long warranty terms of up to 30 years alongside a very low field complaint rate. For a buyer in 2025 who needs the highest possible efficiency in a limited roof area and is willing to pay a premium, AIKO's ABC panels are a compelling choice, particularly in markets where they have strong installer support such as Australia. For a European buyer prioritising a locally recognised brand with a wide product range, proven distributor networks, and competitive mainstream pricing, Luxor remains a solid and well-regarded option. The two brands are not genuinely interchangeable - AIKO sits at the premium high-efficiency tier while Luxor occupies the reliable mid-to-upper mainstream segment. \---LINKS--- \- https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/ \| AIKO achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 status \| article \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/02/07/aiko-launches-new-rooftop-solar-panels-with-24-3-efficiency/ \| Aiko launches rooftop panels with 24.3% efficiency - pv magazine \| article \- https://taiyangnews.info/technology/aiko-abc-neostar-intersolar-europe \| AIKO 24%+ Back-Contact Module for Europe's DG Market - TaiyangNews \| article \- https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/luxor-solar \| Luxor Solar manufacturer review - SolarReviews \| review \- https://www.luxor.solar/en/news-details/top-brand-pv-germany-2025.html \| Luxor Solar Top Brand PV Germany 2025 \| article Sources: \- \[AIKO Tier 1 BloombergNEF announcement\](https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/) \- \[Aiko 24.3% efficiency launch - pv magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/02/07/aiko-launches-new-rooftop-solar-panels-with-24-3-efficiency/) \- \[AIKO ABC Neostar - TaiyangNews\](https://taiyangnews.info/technology/aiko-abc-neostar-intersolar-europe) \- \[Luxor Solar review - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/luxor-solar) \- \[Luxor Top Brand PV Germany 2025\](https://www.luxor.solar/en/news-details/top-brand-pv-germany-2025.html) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Luxor vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/luxor-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko) - [Luxor vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/luxor-vs-aeet) - [AKCOME vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aiko) - [Luxor vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/luxor-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aiko) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/luxor-vs-aiko