---
title: "Luxor Solar vs Sharp - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Luxor Solar vs Sharp solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/luxor-solar-vs-sharp"
---

# Luxor Solar vs Sharp

Luxor Solar has the broader catalog (121 vs 19 models). Luxor Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.12%. Luxor Solar leans bifacial (69% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Luxor Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | Japan |
| Headquarters | Stuttgart | Sakai, Osaka Prefecture |
| Founded | 2007 | 1912 |
| Employees |  | 40,123 |
| Annual capacity |  | 15.4 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | TYO: 6753 |
| Website | [https://www.luxor-solar.com](https://www.luxor-solar.com) | [https://global.sharp](https://global.sharp) |

Sharp Corporation is a Japanese electronics company founded in 1912. It operates globally, offering a wide range of products including consumer electronics, home appliances, energy solutions, and business solutions. Since 2016, it has been majority-owned by Foxconn.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Luxor Solar | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 121 | 19 | +102 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 740 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 509 W | 576 W | +67 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Luxor Solar | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.12% | 23.82% | +0.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.19% | 22.20% | +0.00 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Luxor Solar | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.301%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.001 |
| Bifacial Share | 83 (69%) | 10 (53%) | +16 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.0 yrs | 27.6 yrs | +0.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Sharp skews to higher efficiency: 32% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Luxor Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 8 (6.6%) | 1 (5.3%) |
| 21-22% | 38 (31.4%) | 7 (36.8%) |
| 22-23% | 49 (40.5%) | 5 (26.3%) |
| 23%+ | 21 (17.4%) | 6 (31.6%) |
| Unknown | 5 (4.1%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Sharp offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)


| Power band | Luxor Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (6.6%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 57 (47.1%) | 6 (31.6%) |
| 500-599W | 21 (17.4%) | 6 (31.6%) |
| 600-699W | 23 (19.0%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 12 (9.9%) | 7 (36.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (37%)


| Technology | Luxor Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 46 (38.0%) | 7 (36.8%) |
| TOPCon | 27 (22.3%) | 5 (26.3%) |
| Unknown | 26 (21.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 22 (18.2%) | 0 |
| PERC | 0 | 7 (36.8%) |


## Top panels, Luxor Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LX-720M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-720m-210-132-gg) | 720 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LX-720M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-720m-210-132-gg-1) | 720 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LX-715M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg) | 715 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LX-715M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg-1) | 715 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LX-710M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-710m-210-132-gg) | 710 | 23.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LX-710M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-710m-210-132-gg-1) | 710 | 23.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LX-705M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-705m-210-132-gg) | 705 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LX-705M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-705m-210-132-gg-1) | 705 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LX-700M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-700m-210-132-gg) | 700 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LX-700M/210-132+ GG BiF](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-700m-210-132-gg-bif) | 700 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Sharp


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GSD8K66H-740WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-740wt) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GSD8K66H-735WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-735wt) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GSD8K66H-730WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-730wt) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [GSD8K66H-725WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-725wt) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GSD8K66H-720WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-720wt) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [GSD8K66H-715WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-715wt) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GSD8K66H-710WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-710wt) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NB-JD580](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd580) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NB-JD575](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd575) | 575 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NB-JD570](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd570) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Luxor Solar is a German manufacturer founded in 2007 and headquartered in Stuttgart. It operates as a mid-tier European brand, selling modules in over 85 countries and earning a Top Brand PV designation in Germany for 2024. The company's production relies on sourcing from Asian factories rather than running large-scale captive manufacturing, which limits its footprint on international Tier 1 bankability lists - available search results do not confirm a current Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 listing for Luxor. Sharp is a substantially older and larger institution: the Japanese electronics giant began solar cell research in 1959 and launched mass production in 1963, making it one of the founding names in commercial photovoltaics. By 2010 Sharp led the global solar industry by revenue, and it retains Tier 1 bankable status today, backed by the financial standing of Sharp Corporation. On institutional depth and brand longevity, Sharp holds a clear historical advantage, though its current manufacturing scale in solar is a fraction of what it was at its peak.

Luxor's contemporary catalog leans on its Eco Line series, which incorporates both TOPCon and HJT cell technology, targeting premium residential and small commercial rooftop installations across Europe. The brand's European distribution network and German engineering reputation make it a credible choice for installers in that region, even though it lost CEC approval in Australia and has a limited presence elsewhere. Sharp's current panel range spans roughly 410W to 740W and draws on a mixed technology portfolio that includes HJT, PERC, and TOPCon variants, with HJT representing its premium tier. Sharp's active sales, however, are concentrated in Japan and select Asian markets; panels found in European or North American projects today are in many cases legacy units installed before 2013 rather than current product.

For a buyer in Europe seeking a contemporary module with active local support, Luxor is the more practical option despite its smaller institutional profile. For buyers in Japan or Southeast Asia, Sharp remains a well-supported and bankable choice with genuine premium-tier HJT offerings. Outside those respective home regions, neither brand competes with the scale and supply-chain depth of leading Chinese manufacturers, so the choice between the two is largely a regional distribution question rather than a technology one.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/luxor-solar-review.html \| Luxor Solar panels review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/luxor \| Luxor Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/sharp-solar-panels \| Sharp Solar Panels: How They Compare To Other Top Brands \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/supplier/445/sharp-solar/ \| Sharp Solar profile and reviews - EnergySage \| review

\- https://global.sharp/solar/en/history/ \| Sharp's History of Solar Business - Sharp Corporation \| article

Sources:

\- \[Luxor Solar panels review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/luxor-solar-review.html)

\- \[Luxor Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/luxor)

\- \[Sharp Solar Panels: How They Compare To Other Top Brands - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/sharp-solar-panels)

\- \[Sharp Solar profile and reviews - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/supplier/445/sharp-solar/)

\- \[Sharp's History of Solar Business - Sharp Corporation\](https://global.sharp/solar/en/history/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Luxor Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/luxor-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sharp)
- [Luxor Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/luxor-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sharp)
- [Luxor Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/luxor-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sharp)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/luxor-solar-vs-sharp

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.