---
title: "Luxor Solar vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Luxor Solar vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/luxor-solar-vs-q-cells"
---

# Luxor Solar vs Q-Cells

Luxor Solar has the broader catalog (121 vs 89 models). Luxor Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.12%. Luxor Solar leans bifacial (69% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Luxor Solar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Stuttgart | Seoul |
| Founded | 2007 | 1999 |
| Employees |  | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://www.luxor-solar.com](https://www.luxor-solar.com) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Luxor Solar | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 121 | 89 | +32 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 675 W | +45 W |
| Avg Power | 509 W | 468 W | +41 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Luxor Solar | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.12% | 23.20% | +0.92 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.19% | 21.21% | +0.98 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Luxor Solar | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.301%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.023 |
| Bifacial Share | 83 (69%) | 35 (39%) | +29 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.0 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +1.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Luxor Solar skews to higher efficiency: 17% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Luxor Solar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 8 (6.6%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 38 (31.4%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 49 (40.5%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 21 (17.4%) | 2 (2.2%) |
| Unknown | 5 (4.1%) | 0 |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (7.9%) |


## Power distribution

Luxor Solar offers more 600W+ panels (29% of lineup)


| Power band | Luxor Solar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (6.6%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 57 (47.1%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 21 (17.4%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 23 (19.0%) | 17 (19.1%) |
| 700W+ | 12 (9.9%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Luxor Solar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 46 (38.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 27 (22.3%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| Unknown | 26 (21.5%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| N-type | 22 (18.2%) | 23 (25.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 38 (42.7%) |


## Top panels, Luxor Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LX-720M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-720m-210-132-gg) | 720 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LX-720M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-720m-210-132-gg-1) | 720 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LX-715M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg) | 715 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LX-715M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg-1) | 715 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LX-710M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-710m-210-132-gg) | 710 | 23.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LX-710M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-710m-210-132-gg-1) | 710 | 23.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LX-705M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-705m-210-132-gg) | 705 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LX-705M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-705m-210-132-gg-1) | 705 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LX-700M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-700m-210-132-gg) | 700 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LX-700M/210-132+ GG BiF](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-700m-210-132-gg-bif) | 700 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Luxor Solar is a German manufacturer founded in 2007, and while it has not achieved a formal BloombergNEF Tier 1 listing, it has repeatedly been voted "Top Brand PV" in Germany (2022 through 2025) based on installer recommendation rates and brand trust, and is noted for a very low documented complaint rate. Q-Cells, operating under Hanwha Qcells, traces its roots to the original German Q-Cells brand but is now a Hanwha Solutions division headquartered in South Korea with major manufacturing in Dalton and Cartersville, Georgia in the United States; it holds confirmed Top Tier Class bankability status in BloombergNEF's Tier 1 rankings and reports global annual module production capacity around 11.2 GW. On scale and formal financial bankability, Q-Cells has the clearly stronger institutional footprint, while Luxor's reputation rests more on regional brand trust and quality perception in the European market.

Luxor's product range spans roughly 390W to 720W panels for residential and commercial rooftops, with a portfolio weighted toward bifacial modules and a growing share of TOPCon cells, positioning it as a premium-to-midrange choice for European homeowners and C&I installers who value proven European workmanship and after-sales support over headline bankability credentials. Q-Cells' current lineup centers on its Q.TRON and Q.ANTUM NEO series, both built on TOPCon n-type cell architecture, targeting residential rooftops in North America and Europe as well as larger commercial installations, with module efficiencies above 22.5% and a 25-year performance warranty guaranteeing close to 91% output retention; its scale and U.S. manufacturing footprint also make it a common choice for utility and large commercial projects seeking domestic content or bankable supply.

For a typical residential buyer in 2025, the two brands are close substitutes on core technology, since both now lean on TOPCon cells with comparable efficiency bands. Q-Cells is generally the safer default where formal Tier 1 bankability, financing eligibility, or large-scale project procurement matters, thanks to its BloombergNEF status and larger production base. Luxor Solar is a strong alternative for European buyers prioritizing local brand reputation, documented low defect rates, and a wide bifacial product range, even though it lacks the same formal bankability designation.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/luxor-solar-is-voted-thetop-pv-brand-for-solar-modules/ \| Luxor Solar voted Top PV brand for solar modules \| article

\- https://www.pveurope.eu/solar-modules/solar-panel-producer-luxor-solar-flew-below-radar-and-continues-grow \| Luxor Solar flew below the radar and continues to grow \| article

\- https://www.q-cells.eu/press-releases/detail?tx\_news\_pi1%5Baction%5D=detail&tx\_news\_pi1%5Bcontroller%5D=News&tx\_news\_pi1%5Bnews%5D=50&cHash=f3ef3a7e7bca9bfcb2e2b6f0a7fd8064 \| Qcells achieves Top Tier Class bankability score per BloombergNEF \| article

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review Of Qcells Solar Panels For 2025 \| review

\- https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-new-cartersville-factory-set-for-33-gw-of-solar-module-production-per-year.do \| Hanwha Qcells Cartersville factory set for 3.3 GW production \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Luxor Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/luxor-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Luxor Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/luxor-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Luxor Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/luxor-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/luxor-solar-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.