---
title: "Luxor Solar vs AIKO - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Luxor Solar vs AIKO solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/luxor-solar-vs-aiko"
---

# Luxor Solar vs AIKO

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 121 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Luxor Solar leans bifacial (69% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Luxor Solar | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | China |
| Headquarters | Stuttgart | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2007 | 2009 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 600732 |
| Website | [https://www.luxor-solar.com](https://www.luxor-solar.com) | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Luxor Solar | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 121 | 144 | +23 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 805 W | +85 W |
| Avg Power | 509 W | 581 W | +73 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Luxor Solar | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.12% | 25.20% | +1.08 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.19% | 23.65% | +1.46 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Luxor Solar | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.301%/°C | -0.271%/°C | +0.031 |
| Bifacial Share | 83 (69%) | 35 (24%) | +44 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.0 yrs | 29.5 yrs | +1.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Luxor Solar | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 8 (6.6%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 21-22% | 38 (31.4%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 22-23% | 49 (40.5%) | 12 (8.3%) |
| 23%+ | 21 (17.4%) | 123 (85.4%) |
| Unknown | 5 (4.1%) | 0 |
| \<20% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | Luxor Solar | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (6.6%) | 2 (1.4%) |
| 400-499W | 57 (47.1%) | 50 (34.7%) |
| 500-599W | 21 (17.4%) | 5 (3.5%) |
| 600-699W | 23 (19.0%) | 78 (54.2%) |
| 700W+ | 12 (9.9%) | 9 (6.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | Luxor Solar | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 46 (38.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 27 (22.3%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 26 (21.5%) | 0 |
| N-type | 22 (18.2%) | 17 (11.8%) |
| Back Contact | 0 | 119 (82.6%) |
| PERC | 0 | 7 (4.9%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 1 (0.7%) |


## Top panels, Luxor Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LX-720M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-720m-210-132-gg) | 720 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LX-720M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-720m-210-132-gg-1) | 720 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LX-715M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg) | 715 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LX-715M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-715m-210-132-gg-1) | 715 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LX-710M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-710m-210-132-gg) | 710 | 23.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LX-710M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-710m-210-132-gg-1) | 710 | 23.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LX-705M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-705m-210-132-gg) | 705 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LX-705M/210-132+ GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-705m-210-132-gg-1) | 705 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LX-700M/210-132+GG](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-700m-210-132-gg) | 700 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LX-700M/210-132+ GG BiF](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxor-solar-lx-700m-210-132-gg-bif) | 700 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AIKO is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Zhuhai, founded in 2009, that has grown into one of the most technically ambitious cell makers in the industry. The company achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and has rapidly scaled production, with facilities in Zhuhai and Yiwu together exceeding 25 GW of ABC cell capacity as of 2024-2025. Luxor Solar GmbH, by contrast, is a German company founded in 2007 and headquartered in Stuttgart, with sales offices in Japan and the United States and a reported production capacity of around 6.8 GWp. Luxor holds the EuPD Research "Top Brand PV" seal across Germany and multiple Central and Eastern European markets, though its BloombergNEF Tier 1 standing was not confirmed by available sources. In terms of institutional footprint and manufacturing scale, AIKO currently holds the stronger position globally.

AIKO's product strategy is built around its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) cell technology, which places both electrical contacts on the rear of the cell to eliminate front-side shading losses. Its Neostar series targets premium residential rooftops in the 460-500 W range, while the Comet line serves commercial and industrial applications with modules in the 600-630 W class. Module efficiencies confirmed by independent reviews reach as high as 25.2%, with rooftop variants regularly rated above 24%. Luxor Solar takes a broader portfolio approach, combining TOPCon, HJT, and PERC cell technologies across a wide range of residential and commercial products. The brand has built a reputation in European markets for reliable mid-to-premium modules backed by strong after-sales support and an exceptionally low historical complaint rate.

For a buyer in 2025 who prioritizes peak efficiency and cutting-edge cell technology - particularly for space-constrained rooftops - AIKO is the more compelling choice. Luxor Solar is the better fit for European buyers who value a locally rooted brand, established installer networks, and a diverse technology portfolio across both residential and commercial projects.

\---LINKS---

\- https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/ \| AIKO achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 status \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/aiko-capacity-upgrades-abc-cell-technology/ \| Aiko steps up ABC transition with 11 GW capacity upgrade \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/02/07/aiko-launches-new-rooftop-solar-panels-with-24-3-efficiency/ \| Aiko launches rooftop panels with 24.3% efficiency \| article

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/solar-panels/solar-panel-reviews/luxor-solar \| Luxor Solar panels review - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| AIKO Solar panels review - SolarQuotes \| review

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Luxor Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/luxor-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [Luxor Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/luxor-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aiko)
- [Luxor Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/luxor-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aiko)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/luxor-solar-vs-aiko

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.