---
title: "Luxen Solar Energy vs Phono Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Luxen Solar Energy vs Phono Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/luxen-solar-energy-vs-phono-solar"
---

# Luxen Solar Energy vs Phono Solar

Phono Solar has the broader catalog (174 vs 151 models). Luxen Solar Energy leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Luxen Solar Energy | Phono Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Nanjing |
| Founded | 2005 | 2004 |
| Employees | 500+ | 13000+ |
| Annual capacity | 3 GW/year | 3-4 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.luxensolar.com](http://www.luxensolar.com) | [https://www.phonosolar.com](https://www.phonosolar.com) |

Luxen Solar is a global company dedicated to the production and sales of high-power, low-attenuation solar photovoltaic modules. The company was founded in Spain and has since established manufacturing facilities and branches in various countries. Luxen is recognized as a Tier 1 manufacturer by BloombergNEF and is...

Phono Solar Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, and manufacture of photovoltaic solar panels and is a global provider of solar products and services. The company is affiliated with SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH). Phono Solar has been...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Luxen Solar Energy | Phono Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 151 | 174 | +23 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 730 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 567 W | 515 W | +52 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Luxen Solar Energy | Phono Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.50% | +1.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.42% | 21.77% | +0.65 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Luxen Solar Energy | Phono Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.293%/°C | -0.306%/°C | +0.013 |
| Bifacial Share | 78 (52%) | 74 (43%) | +9 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.6 yrs | 27.1 yrs | +2.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Luxen Solar Energy skews to higher efficiency: 11% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Luxen Solar Energy | Phono Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 2 (1.3%) | 37 (21.3%) |
| 21-22% | 28 (18.5%) | 53 (30.5%) |
| 22-23% | 104 (68.9%) | 62 (35.6%) |
| 23%+ | 17 (11.3%) | 19 (10.9%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 3 (1.7%) |


## Power distribution

Luxen Solar Energy offers more 600W+ panels (43% of lineup)


| Power band | Luxen Solar Energy | Phono Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 42 (27.8%) | 78 (44.8%) |
| 500-599W | 44 (29.1%) | 51 (29.3%) |
| 600-699W | 58 (38.4%) | 23 (13.2%) |
| 700W+ | 7 (4.6%) | 12 (6.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 10 (5.7%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (81%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (37%)


| Technology | Luxen Solar Energy | Phono Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| N-type | 123 (81.5%) | 50 (28.7%) |
| Back Contact | 14 (9.3%) | 1 (0.6%) |
| PERC | 10 (6.6%) | 65 (37.4%) |
| Unknown | 3 (2.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 1 (0.7%) | 53 (30.5%) |
| HJT | 0 | 5 (2.9%) |


## Top panels, Luxen Solar Energy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LNET-720ND](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxen-solar-energy-lnet-720nd) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LNET-715ND](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxen-solar-energy-lnet-715nd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LNET-710ND](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxen-solar-energy-lnet-710nd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LNET-705N](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxen-solar-energy-lnet-705n) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LNET-705ND](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxen-solar-energy-lnet-705nd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LNET-700N](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxen-solar-energy-lnet-700n) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LNET-700ND](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxen-solar-energy-lnet-700nd) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LNET-695ND](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxen-solar-energy-lnet-695nd) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LNET-695N](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxen-solar-energy-lnet-695n) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LNET-690N](https://comparepv.com/panel/luxen-solar-energy-lnet-690n) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Phono Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps730m13gfh-22-wshw) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [NS-730MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-730mh-132) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps725m13gfh-22-wshw) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps720m13gfh-22-wshw) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NS-720MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-720mh-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps715m13gfh-22-wshw) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wnh) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-co-ltd-phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps710m13gfh-22-wshw) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NS-710MH-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-ns-710mh-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PS705M13GFH-22/WNH](https://comparepv.com/panel/phono-solar-technology-co-ltd-ps705m13gfh-22-wnh) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Luxen Solar Energy was founded in Spain in 2005 and has operated its own manufacturing facility in Nantong, Jiangsu province, China, since 2011, alongside a European operational headquarters in Vienna. The company has held Tier 1 status since 2022 and appears among the most bankable manufacturers tracked by PV Tech, with roughly 3 GW of annual production capacity and stated plans to scale to 10 GW by 2026. Phono Solar, by contrast, has been active since 2004 as the renewable energy arm of the SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of Fortune Global 500 conglomerate SINOMACH, headquartered in Nanjing, and began large-scale manufacturing in 2008; it currently runs an estimated 3-4 GW of annual capacity and has been re-elected to the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list for nine consecutive years, giving it a longer and more continuous track record of institutional bankability than Luxen.

Both companies serve residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale ground-mount segments, though Phono Solar fields a notably broader and more diversified catalog spanning PERC, TOPCon and N-type cell technology, including HJT modules reaching efficiencies of up to roughly 23.5 percent. Luxen's lineup is more concentrated, centered on bifacial 108-cell TOPCon panels in the 430-440W range, backed by product warranties extending to 20 years and performance warranties out to 30 years, positioning it as a straightforward, value-oriented option for rooftop projects.

For an international buyer, both brands qualify as legitimate Tier 1 choices, but Phono Solar's longer, uninterrupted bankability history and larger corporate backing give it a slight edge for large financed projects where lender familiarity matters, while Luxen's newer, TOPCon-focused portfolio and aggressive capacity expansion may appeal to buyers prioritizing a leaner, more current product line. For typical rooftop or small commercial installations, the two are largely interchangeable, and the practical choice will often come down to local distributor pricing and warranty support rather than any fundamental technology gap.

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Luxen Solar Energy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/luxen-solar-energy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Phono Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-phono-solar)
- [Luxen Solar Energy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/luxen-solar-energy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Phono Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-phono-solar)
- [Luxen Solar Energy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/luxen-solar-energy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Phono Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-phono-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/luxen-solar-energy-vs-phono-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.