---
title: "LS Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare LS Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/ls-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# LS Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 2 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | LS Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | LS Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 2 | 340 | +338 |
| Max Power | 400 W | 760 W | +360 W |
| Avg Power | 400 W | 520 W | +120 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | LS Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 20.46% | 24.80% | +4.34 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.46% | 21.71% | +1.25 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | LS Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.370%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.068 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | LS Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 1 (50.0%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| Unknown | 1 (50.0%) | 0 |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | LS Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 2 (100.0%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | LS Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 2 (100.0%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, LS Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [STC 01](https://comparepv.com/panel/ls-solar-stc-01) | 400 | 20.5 | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [400 W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ls-solar-400-w) | 400 | - | -0.370 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

LS Solar is a brand with a limited public footprint in the major industry sources consulted for this comparison - including BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists, PV Tech, and pv-magazine. Web searches suggest a possible association with South Korea's LS Electric, part of the LS Group conglomerate headquartered in Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, which operates a PV system product line and has completed large-scale solar projects in South Korea and Japan. However, "LS Solar" does not appear consistently in bankability rankings or independent module reviews, so its institutional footprint remains difficult to verify from public sources. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a well-documented Chinese manufacturer founded in December 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange STAR Market, and consistently rated Tier 1 by BloombergNEF. With annual production capacity of approximately 100 GW and cumulative shipments exceeding 205 GW across more than 160 countries, Trina Solar carries one of the strongest institutional profiles in the global PV industry.

Trina Solar has built its current portfolio around TOPCon cell technology across all market segments. The Vertex S+ G3 dual-glass series targets residential rooftops and small commercial rooftops, while the flagship Vertex N and Vertex NG series - reaching up to 760 W output and 24.5% efficiency - are engineered for utility-scale ground-mount and large C&I applications. The company is actively rolling out what it calls its TOPCon 2.0 generation, positioning itself at the leading edge of mainstream cell efficiency. For LS Solar, publicly available sources do not provide sufficient detail to characterize its current module portfolio or dominant cell technology with confidence, making a product-level comparison unreliable.

For most international buyers - project developers, EPC contractors, or commercial installers - Trina Solar is the clearly verifiable choice, backed by bankability ratings, a dense global distribution network, and a long track record with independent performance testing. LS Solar may represent a legitimate option in specific regional contexts, but buyers should conduct their own due-diligence before committing to a supplier whose public industry profile is limited.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [LS Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/ls-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [LS Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ls-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [LS Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ls-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/ls-solar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.