---
title: "Loom Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Loom Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/loom-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Loom Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 10 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Loom Solar leans bifacial (80% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Loom Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | India | China |
| Headquarters | Faridabad | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2018 | 1997 |
| Employees | 100-500 |  |
| Annual capacity | 0.3 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.loomsolar.com](https://www.loomsolar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Loom Solar is an Indian manufacturer of solar panels, inverters, and lithium batteries, primarily serving the residential and commercial segments. Founded in 2018 and headquartered in Faridabad, Haryana, the company sells its products through a network of over 10,000 dealers across India and exports to more than 10...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Loom Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 10 | 340 | +330 |
| Max Power | 685 W | 760 W | +75 W |
| Avg Power | 562 W | 520 W | +42 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Loom Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.23% | 24.80% | +1.57 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.13% | 21.71% | +0.41 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Loom Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.338%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.036 |
| Bifacial Share | 8 (80%) | 145 (43%) | +37 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.4 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Loom Solar skews to higher efficiency: 30% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Loom Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 1 (10.0%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (30.0%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 3 (30.0%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 3 (30.0%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |


## Power distribution

Loom Solar offers more 600W+ panels (40% of lineup)


| Power band | Loom Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (10.0%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (50.0%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 4 (40.0%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (70%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Loom Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 7 (70.0%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 2 (20.0%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| N-type | 1 (10.0%) | 6 (1.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, Loom Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SHARK 685](https://comparepv.com/panel/loom-solar-shark-685) | 685 | 22.0 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SHARK625](https://comparepv.com/panel/loom-solar-shark625) | 625 | 23.2 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SHARK620](https://comparepv.com/panel/loom-solar-shark620) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SHARK 600](https://comparepv.com/panel/loom-solar-shark-600) | 600 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SHARK-590](https://comparepv.com/panel/loom-solar-shark-590) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HD144N-570](https://comparepv.com/panel/loom-solar-hd144n-570) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HD144N-560](https://comparepv.com/panel/loom-solar-hd144n-560) | 560 | 21.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SHARK 550](https://comparepv.com/panel/loom-solar-shark-550) | 550 | 21.4 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HD144N-550](https://comparepv.com/panel/loom-solar-hd144n-550) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SHARK 275](https://comparepv.com/panel/loom-solar-shark-275) | 275 | 20.6 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Loom Solar is an Indian manufacturer headquartered in Faridabad, founded in 2018 by Amol and Amod Anand. In under a decade the company has grown into one of India's more prominent domestic solar brands, recently crossing the Rs 1,000 crore annual turnover milestone and targeting a module manufacturing capacity of 1.2 GW by 2026. All products carry BIS, IEC, ALMM, and ISO certifications relevant to the Indian regulatory framework. Loom Solar does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV module manufacturer list, which limits its bankability for project-financed installations outside its home market. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou. With approximately 100 GW of confirmed annual module capacity as of the BloombergNEF Q2 2025 Tier 1 ranking - placing it among the top five global producers alongside LONGi, Jinko Solar, JA Solar, and Tongwei - Trina carries far greater institutional weight in international financing circles. On the dimension of global reach and financier acceptance, Trina Solar holds a considerably stronger position.

Loom Solar's flagship offering is the SHARK series, which spans TOPCon bifacial and HJT variants and targets primarily residential rooftop installations across India, with growing ambitions in commercial and utility-scale segments under schemes such as PM-KUSUM. Trina Solar's portfolio is more comprehensively tiered: the Vertex S and Vertex S+ lines, built around i-TOPCon cell technology, serve residential and commercial rooftop buyers with modules up to around 485 W and performance warranties extending to 30 years on select products. The large-format Vertex N series - reaching up to 760 W in confirmed mass production - addresses utility-scale ground-mount projects on every continent. Trina has publicly committed to TOPCon as its primary cell architecture going forward.

For international buyers - including those in North American and European markets - Trina Solar is the more practical default, given its proven bankability, depth of global supply chain, and installer ecosystem. Loom Solar is a credible and locally relevant choice for buyers in India who value ALMM compliance and domestic manufacturing, but it is not yet positioned to compete with Trina at the global level. The two brands are not interchangeable: they serve largely distinct geographies and buyer profiles.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Loom Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/loom-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Loom Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/loom-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Loom Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/loom-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/loom-solar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.