--- title: "LinkSol vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare LinkSol vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/linksol-vs-trina-solar" --- # LinkSol vs Trina Solar Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 26 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | LinkSol | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | Shanghai | Changzhou | | Founded | | 1997 | | Employees | 500 | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | | yes | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.linksolne.com](https://www.linksolne.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | Shanghai LinkSol New Energy Co., Ltd. manufactures and supplies solar cells, PV ribbons, and off-grid solar modules. The company endeavors to supply high-efficiency solar cells, including Topcon, HJT, BC, and P-type mono series. LinkSol continuously strives to produce cost-effective, green power solutions, empowering... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | LinkSol | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 26 | 340 | +314 | | Max Power | 340 W | 760 W | +420 W | | Avg Power | 211 W | 520 W | +309 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | LinkSol | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 18.80% | 24.80% | +6.00 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 16.50% | 21.71% | +5.22 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | LinkSol | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp | | Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | LinkSol | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 26 (100.0%) | 22 (6.5%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) | ## Power distribution Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup) | Power band | LinkSol | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 26 (100.0%) | 28 (8.2%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%) | Technology | LinkSol | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | Unknown | 26 (100.0%) | 11 (3.2%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) | | PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) | | N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) | ## Top panels, LinkSol | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [LKS-6M-340](https://comparepv.com/panel/linksol-lks-6m-340) | 340 | 17.6 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [LKS-6M-335](https://comparepv.com/panel/linksol-lks-6m-335) | 335 | 17.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [LKS-6M-330](https://comparepv.com/panel/linksol-lks-6m-330) | 330 | 17.1 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [LKS-6M-325](https://comparepv.com/panel/linksol-lks-6m-325) | 325 | 16.8 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [LKS-6M-320](https://comparepv.com/panel/linksol-lks-6m-320) | 320 | 16.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [LKS-6M-315](https://comparepv.com/panel/linksol-lks-6m-315) | 315 | 16.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [LKS-6M-310](https://comparepv.com/panel/linksol-lks-6m-310) | 310 | 16.0 | - | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [LKS-5M-245](https://comparepv.com/panel/linksol-lks-5m-245) | 245 | 18.8 | - | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [LKS-5M-240](https://comparepv.com/panel/linksol-lks-5m-240) | 240 | 18.4 | - | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [LKS-5M-230](https://comparepv.com/panel/linksol-lks-5m-230) | 230 | 17.6 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Trina Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary LinkSol does not appear in any major photovoltaic module industry rankings - it is absent from BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists, InfoLink shipment reports, and coverage by PV Tech or PV Magazine through 2024-2025. The brand name surfaces only in the context of a niche supplier of miniature and custom solar panels aimed at IoT sensors, off-grid setups, and remote monitoring hardware, which is a fundamentally different market segment from residential or commercial rooftop modules. No verifiable data on production capacity, bankability status, or mainstream cell technology could be confirmed through research. Trina Solar, by contrast, is one of the most established names in the global solar industry, headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China, and operating continuously since 1997. The company holds a consistent BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability designation and ranked third globally in 2025 module shipments at roughly 77 GW - placing it alongside JinkoSolar and LONGi at the very top of the industry. On any institutional footprint measure, Trina Solar is incomparably better documented than LinkSol. Trina Solar serves all three major market segments: residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale ground-mount. Its flagship Vertex product line is built around N-type TOPCon cell technology; the Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra variant reaches module outputs up to 740 W in mass production, and the Vertex S+ G3 series has been independently reported by pv-magazine to deliver efficiencies up to 24.3%. The company has filed more than 700 TOPCon-related patents and regularly supplies large-scale projects across Europe, the Americas, and Asia-Pacific. Its warranties and bankability rating make project financing straightforward for utility developers. For most international buyers - whether a residential installer sourcing modules for a few rooftops or a developer financing a multi-megawatt plant - Trina Solar is the clear, well-evidenced choice: audited production volumes, confirmed Tier 1 status, a global service network, and a long track record of delivering modules that pass independent testing. LinkSol simply cannot be evaluated on the same terms until it appears in recognized industry databases and shipment reports; buyers should treat the brand with caution until that documentation exists. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [LinkSol vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/linksol-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar) - [LinkSol vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/linksol-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar) - [LinkSol vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/linksol-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/linksol-vs-trina-solar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.