---
title: "Lina Energy vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Lina Energy vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/lina-energy-vs-q-cells"
---

# Lina Energy vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 37 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Lina Energy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | United Kingdom | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Lancaster | Seoul |
| Founded | 2017 | 1999 |
| Employees | 28 | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://www.lina.energy/](https://www.lina.energy/) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

LiNa Energy is a technology company specializing in the development and provision of low-cost, high-performance, and safe sodium batteries. The company focuses on renewable energy storage solutions, offering a safer and more sustainable alternative to lithium-ion batteries. Their solid-state sodium battery technology...

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Lina Energy | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 37 | 89 | +52 |
| Max Power | 550 W | 675 W | +125 W |
| Avg Power | 402 W | 468 W | +66 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Lina Energy | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.37% | 23.20% | +0.83 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.32% | 21.21% | +0.90 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Lina Energy | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.352%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.028 |
| Bifacial Share | 7 (19%) | 35 (39%) | +20 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.4 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +1.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Lina Energy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 12 (32.4%) | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 6 (16.2%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 12 (32.4%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 7 (18.9%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | Lina Energy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 18 (48.6%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 15 (40.5%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 4 (10.8%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 17 (19.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (30%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Lina Energy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 13 (35.1%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| TOPCon | 11 (29.7%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| BIPV | 8 (21.6%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 4 (10.8%) | 0 |
| PERC | 1 (2.7%) | 38 (42.7%) |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |


## Top panels, Lina Energy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LEPV 550](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-550) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LEPV 550 (LEPV 144 HALF-CUT PLUS)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-550-lepv-144-half-cut-plus) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LEPV 132 HC ICON PLUS 500Wp (BLACK - STANDARD - BICOLOUR)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-132-hc-icon-plus-500wp-black-standard-bicolour) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LEPV 500](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-500) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LEPV 480](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-480) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LEPV 475](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-475) | 475 | 21.9 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LEPV 460](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-460) | 460 | 21.2 | -0.381 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LEPV 450](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-450) | 450 | 20.7 | -0.381 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LEPV 132 ULTRA PREMIUM BLACK 440Wp (LEPV 440)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-132-ultra-premium-black-440wp-lepv-440) | 440 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LEPV 440](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-440) | 440 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Lina Energy is a solar manufacturer headquartered in Bulgaria, founded in 2016, with additional offices in Jordan and China. It operates at a regional scale and does not appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 or S&P Global bankability lists, positioning it as a niche rather than globally bankable brand. Q-Cells, now branded as Hanwha Q CELLS after its 2012 acquisition by South Korea's Hanwha Group, traces its roots to Germany in 1999 and has since become one of the world's largest module producers, with combined global manufacturing capacity of approximately 12 GW per year. Q-Cells holds a BloombergNEF Top Tier bankability score, earned S&P Global Tier 1 Cleantech status in 2025, and secured a $1.45 billion DOE loan guarantee for its US factories in Georgia - indicators of an institutional footprint that Lina Energy cannot yet match.

Lina Energy's catalog covers residential and light commercial applications with monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels in the 280W-550W range, and the company has introduced TOPCon cell technology in part of its lineup, making it a reasonable budget option for buyers in southeastern Europe and the Middle East where the brand is most active. Q-Cells centers its offer on premium residential rooftops and distributed commercial installations through the Q.TRON and Q.PEAK series, which rely on the company's proprietary Q.ANTUM passivated-contact cell design. Top models in the Q.TRON M-G2+ range reach efficiencies up to 23.7%, paired with a 25-year product warranty and a verified annual degradation rate of around 0.33%, making them well suited for buyers prioritizing long-term yield and bankable documentation.

For most buyers in 2025, Q-Cells is the stronger default. Its bankability credentials simplify project financing, its US domestic manufacturing reduces supply-chain exposure for North American installations, and its independently documented degradation performance lowers long-term yield risk. Lina Energy suits cost-sensitive or regionally focused projects where its installer network is established, but its absence from global Tier 1 lists makes it a difficult choice for any financed or utility-adjacent deployment. The two brands are not interchangeable at scale.

\---LINKS---

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/lina-energy \| Lina Energy Solar Panels Review 2026 - Pros, Cons and Specs \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/lina-energy \| Lina Energy Technology Ltd. - Solar Panels profile on ENF Solar \| article

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels \| QCells Solar Panels Review 2025 - Cost, Efficiency and Performance \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Q CELLS Solar Panels - Complete Review by EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/q-cells-achieves-top-tier-class-bankability-score-in-latest-bloombergnef-report/ \| Q Cells achieves Top Tier class bankability score in BloombergNEF report \| article

Sources:

\- \[Lina Energy Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/lina-energy)

\- \[Lina Energy Technology Ltd. - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/lina-energy)

\- \[QCells Solar Panels Review - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels)

\- \[Q CELLS Solar Panels Complete Review - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/)

\- \[Q Cells achieves Top Tier bankability score - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/q-cells-achieves-top-tier-class-bankability-score-in-latest-bloombergnef-report/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Lina Energy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/lina-energy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Lina Energy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/lina-energy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Lina Energy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/lina-energy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/lina-energy-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.