--- title: "Lina Energy vs A.B. Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Lina Energy vs A.B. Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/lina-energy-vs-a-b-energy" --- # Lina Energy vs A.B. Energy Lina Energy has the broader catalog (37 vs 0 models). Lina Energy leans bifacial (19% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Lina Energy | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | United Kingdom | Germany | | Headquarters | Lancaster | Wiesbaden | | Founded | 2017 | 1996 | | Employees | 28 | 1,400 | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | | | | Listed | | Xetra, Frankfurt Stock Exchange: AB9 | | Website | [https://www.lina.energy/](https://www.lina.energy/) | [https://abo-energy.com](https://abo-energy.com) | LiNa Energy is a technology company specializing in the development and provision of low-cost, high-performance, and safe sodium batteries. The company focuses on renewable energy storage solutions, offering a safer and more sustainable alternative to lithium-ion batteries. Their solid-state sodium battery technology... ABO Energy is a renewable energy company that develops and constructs renewable energy projects, focusing on wind, solar, and storage facilities. They offer turnkey solutions and have connected several gigawatts of nominal output to the grid. The company is active internationally and is committed to driving the energy... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Lina Energy | A.B. Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 37 | 0 | +37 | | Max Power | 550 W | 0 W | +550 W | | Avg Power | 402 W | 0 W | +402 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Lina Energy | A.B. Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 22.37% | - | | | Avg Efficiency | 20.32% | - | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Lina Energy | A.B. Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.352%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 7 (19%) | 0 (0%) | +19 pp | | Avg Warranty | 28.4 yrs | - | | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | Lina Energy | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 12 (32.4%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 6 (16.2%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 12 (32.4%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 7 (18.9%) | 0 | ## Power distribution | Power band | Lina Energy | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 18 (48.6%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 15 (40.5%) | 0 | | 500-599W | 4 (10.8%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (30%) | Technology | Lina Energy | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | Unknown | 13 (35.1%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 11 (29.7%) | 0 | | BIPV | 8 (21.6%) | 0 | | Back Contact | 4 (10.8%) | 0 | | PERC | 1 (2.7%) | 0 | ## Top panels, Lina Energy | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [LEPV 550](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-550) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [LEPV 550 (LEPV 144 HALF-CUT PLUS)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-550-lepv-144-half-cut-plus) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [LEPV 132 HC ICON PLUS 500Wp (BLACK - STANDARD - BICOLOUR)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-132-hc-icon-plus-500wp-black-standard-bicolour) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [LEPV 500](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-500) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [LEPV 480](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-480) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [LEPV 475](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-475) | 475 | 21.9 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [LEPV 460](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-460) | 460 | 21.2 | -0.381 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [LEPV 450](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-450) | 450 | 20.7 | -0.381 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [LEPV 132 ULTRA PREMIUM BLACK 440Wp (LEPV 440)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-132-ultra-premium-black-440wp-lepv-440) | 440 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [LEPV 440](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-440) | 440 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary I have enough sourced material now to write a hedged, non-fabricated comparison. A.B. Energy is an Italian company headquartered in Orzinuovi, in the province of Brescia, operating out of a roughly 40,000-square-meter industrial site. Rather than manufacturing its own cells, it functions primarily as a system integrator and distributor, assembling and selling projects built around third-party panel brands such as REC Solar, JA Solar, Trina Solar, LONGi Solar, HD Hyundai Energy Solutions and Maysun Solar, paired with inverters from SMA, Fronius, SolarEdge and Huawei. Because it is not itself a module manufacturer, it does not carry a BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability rating, which is a classification reserved for panel producers. Lina Energy, by contrast, is a Bulgaria-headquartered group founded in 2016 (Burgas), with additional branches reported in China, Jordan and Canada, and is generally described as a manufacturer of monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels spanning residential to utility-scale outputs, with part of its lineup reportedly using TOPCon cell technology. Public Tier 1 / BNEF listings for Lina Energy were not found in this research, so its bankability status relative to top-tier Chinese producers remains unconfirmed. In terms of institutional footprint, A.B. Energy's strength lies in its established Italian engineering and integration base and its access to well-known Tier 1 component brands, while Lina Energy's footprint is that of a smaller, newer, internationally dispersed manufacturer without a verified bankability record. The two companies serve different roles rather than directly competing on the same product category. A.B. Energy is best understood as a project developer and EPC-style integrator for the Italian market, useful to buyers who want a local partner assembling proven, independently Tier 1-rated hardware (REC, JA Solar, Trina, LONGi) into a turnkey residential or commercial system. Lina Energy positions itself more as a panel brand in its own right, offering a broad catalog described as including monocrystalline, polycrystalline and some flexible or specialty formats for residential, commercial and utility-scale use, with TOPCon featured in part of the range, though independent efficiency and durability data are limited. For a typical 2025 buyer, the more bankable default is arguably A.B. Energy's model, not because A.B. Energy itself is a stronger manufacturer, but because the panels it sources (from Tier 1, BNEF-listed brands) carry a verifiable track record, whereas Lina Energy's own manufacturing claims are harder to independently confirm from available sources. Buyers should treat this less as "brand versus brand" and more as "integrator versus manufacturer," and verify Lina Energy's specific model datasheets and any regional certifications directly before purchase. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.enfsolar.com/a-b-energy \| A.B. Energy srls company and seller profile \| article \- https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-a-b-energy \| A.B. Energy brand comparison and product sourcing overview \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/lina-energy \| Lina Energy Technology Ltd. company and panel listings \| article \- https://comparepv.com/reviews/lina-energy \| Lina Energy Solar Panels Review 2026: pros, cons and specs \| review \- https://assets.bnef.com/public/tiering/solarmodules.pdf \| BloombergNEF Tier 1 Solar Module Methodology \| article Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Lina Energy vs AE Solar](https://comparepv.com/lina-energy-vs-ae-solar) - [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy) - [Lina Energy vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/lina-energy-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy) - [Lina Energy vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/lina-energy-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-a-b-energy) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/lina-energy-vs-a-b-energy Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.