--- title: "LG vs AEET - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare LG vs AEET solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/lg-vs-aeet" --- # LG vs AEET LG has the broader catalog (24 vs 5 models). LG leads on peak efficiency at 22.10%. LG leans bifacial (17% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | LG | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | South Korea | | | Headquarters | Seoul | | | Founded | 1958 | | | Employees | 74,000+ | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | | no | | Listed | KRX: 066570 | | | Website | [https://www.lg.com](https://www.lg.com) | | LG Electronics is a South Korean multinational electronics company. Founded in 1958, LG is a global leader and technology innovator in consumer electronics, mobile communications, and home appliances. Although LG officially closed its solar panel business in 2022, the company continues to offer support for existing... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | LG | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 24 | 5 | +19 | | Max Power | 455 W | 200 W | +255 W | | Avg Power | 404 W | 190 W | +214 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | LG | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 22.10% | 15.70% | +6.40 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 20.74% | 14.90% | +5.84 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | LG | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.315%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 4 (17%) | 0 (0%) | +17 pp | | Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | LG | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 4 (16.7%) | 5 (100.0%) | | 20-21% | 10 (41.7%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 9 (37.5%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 1 (4.2%) | 0 | ## Power distribution | Power band | LG | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 13 (54.2%) | 5 (100.0%) | | 400-499W | 11 (45.8%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (100%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) | Technology | LG | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | N-type | 24 (100.0%) | 0 | | PERC | 0 | 5 (100.0%) | ## Top panels, LG | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [LG455N2W-E6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg455n2w-e6) | 455 | 20.7 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [LG450N2W-E6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg450n2w-e6) | 450 | 20.5 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [LG445N2W-E6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg445n2w-e6) | 445 | 20.2 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [LG440N2T-E6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg440n2t-e6) | 440 | 19.8 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [LG440N2W-E6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg440n2w-e6) | 440 | 20.0 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [LG440QAC-A6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg440qac-a6) | 440 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [LG435QAC-A6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg435qac-a6) | 435 | 21.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [LG435N2T-E6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg435n2t-e6) | 435 | 19.6 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [LG430N2T-E6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg430n2t-e6) | 430 | 19.4 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [LG430QAC-A6](https://comparepv.com/panel/lg-lg430qac-a6) | 430 | 21.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AEET Energy Group GmbH is a Germany-based company operating as a photovoltaic wholesale distributor and project partner, serving customers across residential, commercial, and solar-park segments. The firm is headquartered in Germany and markets itself as active across Europe and beyond, though publicly verified annual production or shipment figures in gigawatts are not available from the sources reviewed. LG Electronics, headquartered in Seoul, South Korea, built a strong solar division around its NeON product family before announcing in early 2022 that it would cease all solar panel manufacturing by June of that year, citing intensifying price pressure from large Asian producers. During its active years, LG earned consistent recognition as a bankable Tier 1 manufacturer, and its panels were frequently cited by sources such as SolarReviews and EnergySage as among the highest-quality modules available to residential buyers. On institutional footprint and historical brand recognition, LG carried significantly more weight. AEET Energy Group positions its offer across the full project spectrum, from private-household rooftop installations to larger commercial and solar-park deployments, acting primarily as a procurement and installation partner rather than a vertically integrated cell-to-module manufacturer. LG's discontinued NeON line - particularly the NeON 2 and NeON R - was built around N-type IBC cell technology and reached module efficiencies of up to 22.3%, making it a premium choice for space-constrained residential rooftops. LG continues to honor its original 25-year product and performance warranties on installed panels, though replacement inventory is limited and approximately 60 percent of approved claims are now settled in cash rather than with a physical panel. For a buyer evaluating new solar procurement in 2025-2026, the comparison is asymmetric: LG is no longer an active supplier of new modules, so it cannot be chosen for a fresh installation unless surplus stock is sourced. AEET Energy Group remains operationally active and can fulfill new residential or commercial projects. Buyers seeking a new system should evaluate AEET alongside other active Tier 1 manufacturers, while those with existing LG installations can take reasonable comfort that warranty obligations are still being met. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.energysage.com/blog/lg-exiting-solar-industry/ \| LG exiting the solar industry - what it means for buyers \| article \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/are-lg-solar-panels-the-best-modules-to-install-on-your-home \| Review of LG Solar Panels - SolarReviews \| review \- https://www.aeet-energy.com/en/index.php \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - photovoltaic wholesale partner \| article \- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH profile - ENF Solar \| article \- https://solartechonline.com/blog/lg-solar-panels-review-guide/ \| LG Solar Panels Review 2025 - complete guide and alternatives \| review Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [LG vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/lg-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aeet) - [LG vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/lg-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet) - [LG vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/lg-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/lg-vs-aeet Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.